On Tue, 22 May 2018 03:07:08 +, Michel Beaulieu wrote:
>What is missing in the redbook, is a program to grab JES2 spool output and
>send to IP printer using LPR.
>May be someone else can help with that part.
>
SDSF is pretty good at "grab JES2 spool output". There's a nice Rexx interface
On Mon, 21 May 2018 19:13:52 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Is there any non-cost solutions built within z/OS 1.13 to print from
>JES2 to basic IP printers?
>
What does "// OUTPUT DEST='IP:ipaddr'" do for you? (But from a 2.3 ref.)
I thought there was a TSO command to print to an IP printer, but
On 18May21:1718-0500, Edward Gould wrote:
> > In these days, sometimes the first few inches or feet of tapes could become
> > damaged
> >
> > so it would not be possible to load the tape and even less read the tape
> > label or the data after that.
> > I remember there was a little tool to make
What is missing in the redbook, is a program to grab JES2 spool output and send
to IP printer using LPR.
May be someone else can help with that part.
From: Michel Beaulieu
Sent: May 21, 2018 10:54:16 PM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Tony,
May be you can find what you need in this redbook:
IBM z/OS V1R13 Communications
Server TCP/IP Implementation:
Volume 2 Standard Applications
SG24-7997
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247997.pdf
IBM z/OS V1R13 Communications Server TCP/IP Implementation
On Mon, 21 May 2018 17:18:24 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>
>I don’t go further back than the 360’s, but IIRC the tape reals also needed a
>reflector. I have never heard of a reflector being applied, anyone?
>
In:
I think I tried this once:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.halp001/ispfint.htm
I don't know if it's still an option.
Len Rugen
University of Missouri
Division of Information Technology
Systems & Operations - Metrics & Automation Team
Is there any non-cost solutions built within z/OS 1.13 to print from
JES2 to basic IP printers?
--
Tony Thigpen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
> On May 21, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Michel Beaulieu wrote:
>
> Let me speculate that the term goes back to tape use:
> In these days, sometimes the first few inches or feet of tapes could become
> damaged
>
> so it would not be possible to load the tape and even less read
It's a rather old acronym, going back to a stand-alone program for the S/360.
The original CLIP could only change the 6-character volser on a DASD volume;
later versions could create a tape volume label.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Nope, originally it was a stand-alone program for DASD, and changed only the
6-character volume serial number. Later versions could create a tape label.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Lucas,
Thank you! That is exactly what I was looking for. I normally would have
humbly accepted "RTFM" as a response, but I'm not sure I would have found it.
The manual (in KC and the online PDF) doesn't describe it in a way that's
intuitive to me, and the example they give:
I seriously doubt that. Certainly I never heard the term in a computer context
prior to the CLIP program of S/360.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Sometime ago it was suggest that we have a XCF ARM Policy so that our
automation product automatically restart if it went down.
We've never setup an ARM policy and I'm looking for a sample, other than the
one in SAMPLIB. Anyone have a simple one they would be willing to share?
Thanks,
Ken
Martin,
Can I get a copy of your presentation?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ZIIP engine utilization
I have a zIIP
W dniu 2018-05-21 o 11:19, Timothy Sipples pisze:
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
BTW2: It's big pity IBM stopped providing real tape drives for z/OS.
That would be a pity if it were true. Fortunately, it's not true. Tape
libraries, tape drives, and tape cartridges for z/OS (and for z/VSE, z/VM,
and
IMHO it's some software on your email server altered the link.
Note, it contains your name.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2018-05-21 o 15:08, Allan Staller pisze:
Love the tag line. Lizette, you made my day!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You could trim the tape leader without needing to relabel a tape (or lose data)
as long as you didn't get too close to the shiny spot :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Let me speculate that the term goes back to tape use:
In these days, sometimes the first few inches or feet of tapes could become
damaged
so it would not be possible to load the tape and even less read the tape label
or the data after that.
I remember there was a little tool to make a clean
Love the tag line. Lizette, you made my day!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS V2.1 EOS Sept 2018
In case some are not
After reading this thread to its current completion, I am siding with "Change
Label In Place" regardless of its original meaning. This is in keeping with the
tradition of IBM acronyms having multiple meanings or two things having the
same meaning. :-)
SMS is an example of an acronym (System
Hi All,
As per some recent articles there seems to be some work happening on machine
learning on mainframes.Can someone kindly let me know on how exactly will this
benefit w.r.t mainframes.Which of either data analytics or machine learning/AI
training would be the right area to get trained on
So initial question had two parts :
1. DAF Unknown X01BB data - - As other lister's pointed indeed there was
80/RACF types and initially when I had compiled/linkedited the CBT DAF had it
NO ...anyway i have no intention to process those records type hence will
ignore them...
Just FYI - I
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>What Timothy said is one can perform backup of distributed systems on
>mainframe tapes attached to z/OS. It could make sense when you altready
>have z/OS, but for non-mainframe shop it would be really ridiculous to
>use z/OS as backup server.
Well OK, but then you
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>BTW2: It's big pity IBM stopped providing real tape drives for z/OS.
That would be a pity if it were true. Fortunately, it's not true. Tape
libraries, tape drives, and tape cartridges for z/OS (and for z/VSE, z/VM,
and z/TPF) are all available and popular.
IBM has
25 matches
Mail list logo