Hello
I am trying to rename the cluster part of VSAM but it fails with below
message and not getting reason code explanation in manual so far
IDCAMS SYSTEM SERVICES TIME: 10:59:35
ALTER DFHSM.MCDS NEWNAME(DFHSM.MCDS.OLD) - 00110101
CATALOG(CATALOG.ROPB.COMMON)
IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
On 22/2/22 6:30 pm, Erik Janssen wrote:
Thanks for the pointers! Very interesting, I never realized that the ZSS part
was also open source and written in metal C. I've so far only seen very minimal
examples of using metal C, so I will look into the code!
ZSS is written in LE C. It is program
Great discussion here. For those who are interested, here is a link to
charts/recordings for a DFSMShsm education series. One of the sessions is
specifically on the DFSMShsm control data sets that discusses RLS, CA Reclaim,
Reorgs, etc. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Seymour J Metz wrote:
>With Trunc 71 and Verify 1-72, text won't inadvertently spill over from
comments into the continuation column. You can still key a character into
column 72.
Nope. Well, you can key it, but it won't "take". That's part of the
definition of TRUNC.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:10:06 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>... there
>is a theology in security that you err on the side of less detail about a
>security failure, to prevent attackers from gaining information that might
>help them in their quest. This is why, for example, it's considered
Thanks Phil, I'll keep this in mind. I will say that if a hacker were trying
to break TLS (or whatever) in this example they'd likely use their own client
and thus have access to all of this information anyway.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Did Tom's suggestion fox your problem?
Steve Beaver
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pierre Fichaud
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DC4 abend - R15=91040120
Tom,
Bummer. Maybe someone from IBM can shed light on the issue.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Binyamin Dissen [bdis...@dissensoftware.com]
Sent:
Every year the z/OS Management Facility team distributes an annual survey to
better understand the end users' needs and prioritize our roadmap to
modernization so that it brings value to the user community.
We would like to ask you to please contribute your input to this survey no
later than
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:22:40 + Seymour J Metz wrote:
:>I believe that XEDIT and UPDATE are substantially as they were in VM/SP R2,
except that starting with R3 you could write your macros in REXX.
:>With Trunc 71 and Verify 1-72, text won't inadvertently spill over from
comments into the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:16:18 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>>I resorted to using basic XEDIT and generating my updates
>
>>with SuperC UPDCMS8.
>
(Why is quoted material appearing double-spaced? Is this a perversion
of a markdown filter?)
>As others have pointed out, this is easily remedied by
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this.
It is interesting. Since CICS can have 100s of regions and each region may
have a unique load address, it is almost impossible to set SLIP
IF(Instruction Fetch) automatically across the regions. I understand it is
not advisable or may not be often
BTDT,GTTS
I would argue that multiple edits that are part of a single enhancement belong
in a single checkin. For context, this is based on using a home grown IDE that
timestamped changed lines, solicited and formatted change descriptions, and
generally did the grunt work to have a good audit
I believe that XEDIT and UPDATE are substantially as they were in VM/SP R2,
except that starting with R3 you could write your macros in REXX.
With Trunc 71 and Verify 1-72, text won't inadvertently spill over from
comments into the continuation column. You can still key a character into
column
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>Hope that I am not doing too many newbie questions. I did a lot of VM in
the
>80s, including mods to CP and CMS, but either my memory isn't good or
things
>changed quite a bit.
No such thing as "too many" REAL questions (not "Do my homework for me"!)
>Why is
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>I had a disappointment with XEDIT Update mode: If I touch
>a line; have second thoughts and restore it, even by an
>immediate ERASE EOF, it puts the line needlessly in the
>Update file. Working in a cooperative development project,
>I resorted to using basic XEDIT and
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:32:57 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>If it's a single line change, I just edit the resulting ptf member and
>remove the extra modification. If it's in a group of lines being
>changed, it's most likely going to be in the ptf anyway.
>
SuperC is less error-prone than I am.
And
There is no 73-80 dependency in XEDIT/UPDATE either. Just the last 8
characters, so it could be 1001-1008 if you need 1000 characters for
your code.
Tony Thigpen
Seymour J Metz wrote on 2/23/22 09:21:
diff/patch is more flexible; no 73-80 dependency.
In simple cases I can see that, but
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:21:05 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> diff/patch is more flexible; no 73-80 dependency.
>
>In simple cases I can see that, but what happens when blocks of code repeat?
>Sometimes you need both a screwdriver and a hammer.
>
Or when a sizeable block of code is moved. I know
If it's a single line change, I just edit the resulting ptf member and
remove the extra modification. If it's in a group of lines being
changed, it's most likely going to be in the ptf anyway.
Tony Thigpen
Paul Gilmartin wrote on 2/23/22 09:01:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:11:20 -0500 Tony Thigpen
> You should continue the conversation over on the VM list.
I could see cross posting, but z/VM is as on topic here as z/OS. Why not
continue here?
> I use a system that generates the AUX files
For those not familiar with VM, the combination of XEDIT and UPDATE is a nice
start for a
> diff/patch is more flexible; no 73-80 dependency.
In simple cases I can see that, but what happens when blocks of code repeat?
Sometimes you need both a screwdriver and a hammer.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
Ronen
I have discussed this with the Omegamon development team and they have a
complete answer for you including screenshots.
Please can you contact me off-list (rsc...@rs.com) and I will forward their
email to you.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:11:20 -0500 Tony Thigpen wrote:
>>
>> :>I use a system that generates the AUX files dynamically for each "xedit
>> :>with update function". There is only one CTRL file, ...
>> :>
I had a disappointment with XEDIT Update mode: If I touch
a line; have second thoughts and
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:16:59 -0400 Peter Relson wrote:
:>I would hope that CICS provides a way for a customer to "learn" the
:>address range for a particular CICS-managed private-area module which in
:>turn would be what you'd have to use in order to set a SLIP trap to
:>monitor it.
It does.
To add to my previous post,
I would hope that CICS provides a way for a customer to "learn" the
address range for a particular CICS-managed private-area module which in
turn would be what you'd have to use in order to set a SLIP trap to
monitor it.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
All that is in my AUXLIST is:
ASS1
ASS2
This for an assembler program with 2 updates.
Tony Thigpen
Binyamin Dissen wrote on 2/23/22 07:52:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:11:20 -0500 Tony Thigpen wrote:
:>You should continue the conversation over on the VM list.
:>I use a system that
I also try to keep it simple and these are the steps I perform for re-sizing
the HSM cluster. Beside the shutdown and start up commands, all else is within
a single batch job.
1) Shut down HSM.
2) Run a listcat of the HSM cluster.
3) Back up the HSM cluster to tape.
4) Export the file via
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:11:20 -0500 Tony Thigpen wrote:
:>You should continue the conversation over on the VM list.
:>I use a system that generates the AUX files dynamically for each "xedit
:>with update function". There is only one CTRL file, which has:
:>TEXT MACS
:>FIXES AUXLIST
:>My
Hope that I am not doing too many newbie questions. I did a lot of VM in the
80s, including mods to CP and CMS, but either my memory isn't good or things
changed quite a bit.
Why is TRUNC set, by default, at 71 for ASSEMBLE files? Is there some tricky
was to put in a continuation character or
You should continue the conversation over on the VM list.
I use a system that generates the AUX files dynamically for each "xedit
with update function". There is only one CTRL file, which has:
TEXT MACS
FIXES AUXLIST
My personal source control system uses SFS with program level locks
which
Thanks to all.
SIDCODE does the job.
Now I have to remember how to make AUX files. I can make CNTRL files, but
multi-source fixes would eventually drive me to a separate CNTRL per source.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:49:22 -0500 Phil Smith III wrote:
:>I think I misread the requirement. Try this
Hello,
We are in the process of migrating from TMON to Omegamon.
I'm trying to recreate the screens of TMON MVS in Omegamon's Enhanced 3270
facility.
I ran into a problem trying to get access to a few values that are displayed in
TMON and not Omeagmon.
I'm referring to the TMON MVS screen
33 matches
Mail list logo
