Classification: Confidential
This value is from the application point of view. For example. If a particular
image is to be IPL'ed, other images in the sysplex take over the work.
With appropriate configuration of the major subsystems this is seamless to the
end-user.
i.e. the end-user in tim-bu
Classification: Confidential
Many do!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob
Bridges
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 7:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] 8 9s, really?
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you
Classification: Confidential
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Shaffer, Terri
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOS
Classification: Confidential
Agreed!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Shaffer, Terri
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 12:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you t
Classification: Confidential
Things to check.
TCP Policy Agent
Other users of the poirt (as previously suggested).
OMVS segment for the affected user.
Public/Private keypair definitions and Permissions. SSH is (*VERY PICKY*) about
file permissions.
I suggest the following reading (thank you Dove
Classification: Confidential
Short version. Yes. Many times the same action hoid will be repeated multiple
times for each ptf in that particular "chain".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Munif Sadek
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 8:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@L
o 14:13, Allan Staller pisze:
> Classification: Confidential
>
> Short version. Yes. Many times the same action hoid will be repeated multiple
> times for each ptf in that particular "chain".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Classification: Confidential
Did you transfer the certificate as text (DO NOT USE BINARY).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 1:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Certificate differences between Z/VM a
Classification: Confidential
Sri, ITYM BPXPSATSL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 2:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: unix commands in batch and su
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organi
Classification: Confidential
I had a long offline discussion with Marna on the same subject. The workflows
are expanded in the "portrait" dimension. All of my monitors are in landscape
mode. Much unnecessary scrolling, etc. just to click the "task complete" button.
-Original Message-
Fr
Classification: Confidential
IIRC, SSL is now supported by the base OS IIRC z/OS 2.1+
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian Westerman
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 9:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: After installing z/OS 2.5 , we are not
Classification: Confidential
At leas one of my clients are using this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Ross
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2023 9:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Checkpoint/restart in COBOL applications?
[CAUTION: This Email
Classification: Confidential
I retract the above below. I was conflating SSH with SSL. My apologies. SSL
can/should be dropped.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 6:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
Classification: Confidential
Not my dog, but I would not do that, except under extreme duress.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 4:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GRS setup for MONOPLEX to SYSPLEX
Classification: Confidential
I would tak a couple of FICON cables and string them between ports. Not sure
about the z/14 hardware design.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gorlinsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 8:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
Classification: Confidential
Sounds like bean counters run amuck.
You might have a look at WPS (claims to be source compatible w/SAS)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kenneth Kripke
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 2:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA
Classification: Confidential
According to the Preview Announcement, z/OS 3.1 requires a minimum of a z/14.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/preview-zos-31-ai-infused-operating-system-next-generation-computing#highx__title__1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Classification: Confidential
It depends. SYNCSORT uses one method. DFSORT uses another. IIRC (but verify),
DFSORT uses only a single extent.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Billy Ashton
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
program to figure
things out.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 6:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SORTWK space usage
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you
Classification: Confidential
TSO BPXMTEXT E329 will ive you some answers and possible corrections
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 2:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Problem running GIMUNZIP jo
Classification: Confidential
Going back to the original post, I seemed to have missed the information about
the operating system release.
z/OS (MVS...) has not supported the 3215 for at least 20 years. (ISTR MVS/ESA
R.x, but that could be incorrect.)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
Classification: Confidential
Most likley it is a missing library in the SYSLIB concatenation.
1) Check the assembly listing for "macro not found" messages
2) locate the macro
3) Using the SMPE dialogs, adjust the SYSLIB DDDEF to include the missing macro
library(ies)
HTH,
-Original Message
Classification: Confidential
ISTR the some of the older "console" support was removed in the indicated
timeframe. E.g. 1052
I cannot say for certain that the 3215 code was removed at that time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Phil Smith III
Sent:
Classification: Confidential
As indicated previously, the code to support those devices was *removed* from
z/OS (or whatever incarnation at that time).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Farley, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 11:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@L
Classification: Confidential
The undefined op-codes below are the macros Prevviously mentioned.
The need to be located in some macro library (try looking in .SGDAMAC).
Using the SMP ISPF dialogs add this macro library to the syslib concatenation
(DDDEF=SYSLIB).
HTH,
-Original Message-
EN?
> >>>>
> >>>> Gerry
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On 25 Jul 2023, at 11:20, Sathish Kumar
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sure, I don't have AMODGEN Marco library.
Classification: Confidential
This is z/OS 2.4. What does "not supported" mean per se? It comes up fine, just
the output is fugly. And I'm 99.44% sure that wasn't true on our previous
system.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Tuesday
Classification: Confidential
This is z/OS 2.4. What does "not supported" mean per se? It comes up fine, just
the output is fugly. And I'm 99.44% sure that wasn't true on our previous
system.
In this case, it means te code to support said devices was *removed* from z/OS.
I can't speak for z/VM.
Classification: Confidential
Lots of extra (unnecessary work)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Rebecca Martin
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSU Maintenance: Asking For a Friend
[CAUTION: This Email is
Classification: Confidential
WS/SFTP?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Estle
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 4:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Preferred FTP Client for Windows
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unl
Classification: Confidential
YES.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Rick Troth
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Preferred FTP Client for Windows
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless
Classification: Confidential
Have you updated the TCP/IP policy agent accordingly?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian Westerman
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 9:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AT-TLS and CSSMTP setup
[CAUTION: This
Classification: Confidential
My vague recollection of the CRAY was that is used (at the time) a 370/158 to
buffer up all of the data so the CRAY could run full tilt.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Grant Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:53 PM
T
Classification: Confidential
Than sounds suspiciously like a "channel" on the mainframe (pick your favorite
protocol).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Grant Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 9:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainfr
Classification: Confidential
I must disagree here. This is just a different implementation of the existing z
architecture.
There may be some minor omissions, but I see nothing new here.
FLEX has been around for quite a while, and was always about z-emulation on an
x86 chip.
It does provide som
Classification: Confidential
YES. Don't remember how. It is built in to SAS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Regan
Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2023 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Using SAS/MXG to create a .csv file
[CAUTION: This
Classification: Confidential
You did not say where the TSO response time issues were being observed. I
suspect, from the information provided it is on SC08D3(possible) or SC14D4
(most likely).
If you look, I suspect the majority of CPU consumption is from the *MSTR DB2
address space. DB2 will
Classification: Confidential
For the purpose stated (STP Timiing links only) I doubt an increase will be
needed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Minimum LPAR size
.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, August 3rd, 2023 at 12:17 PM, Allan Staller
<0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Classification: Confidential
>
> You did not say where the TSO response time issues were being observed. I
> suspect, from the information provid
Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 7th, 2023 at 8:30 AM, Allan Staller
<0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Classification: Confidential
>
> Ok. You zre using 2 period TSO Service Defs. I suggest you adjust the perio
Classification: Confidential
Bill,
Why don't you move there?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: Cloud may be overpriced compared to on-premises systems
Classification: Confidential
SYSOUT= & DSN= are mutually exclusive on a given DD statement. Not possible.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DD SYSOUT=(,),DSN=&SYS
Classification: Confidential
To all,
Stop feeding the troll and maybe he'll go away
::DISCLAIMER::
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be
secure
Classification: Confidential
The TRUSTED attribute usually comes along with an ID that cannot be "logged on
to", so, it is not available for manipulation.
By this time, auditors should be fully conversant in te trusted attribute.
I don't see an issue here.
My USD 0.02 worth.
-Original Mess
Classification: Confidential
"You never see a PTF that is 1MB"
JAVA SDK's ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 8:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RPMs for installs and Maint: [WAS SMP/E needed fo
Classification: Confidential
SMF type 17 records
I strongly suggest the DAF program form the CBT tape.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sathish Kumar
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 9:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMF Extract Using
Classification: Confidential
FWIW, I do not use *any* cataloged dataset for SMP/E Targets/DLIBDS. During
installation, I took the time to update all of the DDDEFS with VOLSER
information.
M USD $0.02 worth.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Long
Classification: Confidential
PKB
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AI expert hot new position.
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unles
Classification: Confidential
Thank you, Darren
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Roberto Halais
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2023 5:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Posting Guidelines
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Orga
Classification: Confidential
Look at the code in SHOWZOS on the CBTTAPE. WWW.CBTTAPE.ORG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Boesel Guillaume
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Retrieve LPAR weight without BCP
Classification: Confidential
1) start TMSINIT and reply with the "shutdown" password.
2) dynamically remove the TMS subsystem. (update parmlib,. as needed)
3) namoicall remove TMS load libraries from lnklst, apf, the TMS loadlibs
are typically in lnklst.
4) rename TMC and audit files
HT
Classification: Confidential
Agreed, however it seems the OP is operating in a "toggle-plex" i.e. either
LPAR A is running or LPARB is running. In this case, the DVIPA would be
deactivated on one of the LPARS and switched manually via the V TCPIP command
to activate/deactivate the DVIPA on LPAR
om outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:18:33 +0000, Allan Staller wrote:
>Agreed, however it seems the OP is o
Classification: Confidential
I believe you need to clarify the following.
Are these JCL symbols or SYSTEM symbols.
System symbols can be change dynamically (as of z/OS 2.1; prior to 2.1 via
unsupported utilkity).
I am unaware of any method to change JCL symbols directly.
-Original Message
Classification: Confidential
There is a REXX? API available. Check the fine manuals.
An alternative would be SMPLIST and parse the output with the tool of you
choice.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023
,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:08:04 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>That is not correct. The DVIPA and be started/stopped in a specific TCPIP
>instance.
>IIRC, the commad is something like V
>TCPIP,,SYSPLEX,ACTIVATE,DVIPA=xx.xx.
omise your Computer.]
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:55:17 +0000, Allan Staller wrote:
> The difference iis n starting/stopping the application is a service
> interruption to the end user.
> The DVIPA activate/deactivate would be seamless to the end user
DVIPA activate/deactivate isn't seamless.
u may want to read up on how TCPIP's Sysplex distributor works. Although it
is designed so to have multiple server tasks up at the same time, you can use
it and just have one task up and running.normally move it from one LPAR to
another as needed.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:51:04 +, Allan S
Classification: Confidential
That is not an option I would undertake.
Last I heard both Panvalet and Endeavour are both CA (Compuware) which is what
prompted the bill,
And the question in this thread.
My opinion is that BMC is behaving like the CA of the late 80's, early 90's.
How many installa
Classification: Confidential
In my experience, the 1st letter of the APAR name is a "version" designator.
e.g. JES2 has historically had many variants of a "single product".
So the APAR "documentation" designation would be OAx.
An actual "APAR FIX" (with test code) for the "1st version" would
Classification: Confidential
Keypunches persisted at University of Waterloo until the early 80s, not because
the U was backward, but because ONE prof (not my dad!) insisted on using them.
IIRC the I/O operators (remember them?) tried various stunts, like
"accidentally" dropping his box of card
Classification: Confidential
A connection from the application
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 7:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Messaeg IXC531I SETXCF START ALTER REQUEST FOR STRUCTURE REJ
Classification: Confidential
SMS CAN most certainly control temp DS's. I can't say with certainty that this
will apply to OMVS files.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 11:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Classification: Confidential
Yup!. I could spend about a 1/2 hour typing up the pros/cons of that tuning.
Almost a short story in length.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2023 11:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Su
Classification: Confidential
100% concur w/Martin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Martin Packer
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 2:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SQA overflow condition
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organiza
Classification: Confidential
I haven't actually experienced this, but I would expect TCPIP to cease
functioning., while the rest of the system continues to function.
This is almost (but not quite) as bad as a system crash,
If you have a DVIPA, you could recycle the TCPIP task and the DVIPA back
Classification: Confidential
From the APAR numbers, they are ancient and most likely do not apply to ans
z/OS system (OS 390 or earlier perhaps).
That coed is undoubtedly in the JES3 and Jes3/Plus base. I would not worry
about them.
One other thing. TDMF can move inactive page datasets. It will
Classification: Confidential
Short answer. Yes. Do it now.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: zOSMF install
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization.
Classification: Confidential
Nothing major on the 1st 2 points. LPAR1 cannot join the sysplex until GRS= in
IEASYS00 is updated to (at least) TRYJOIN.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Laurence Chiu
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@
omise your Computer.]
The ESQA usage has gone to 108%.
Is there any tool available in CBTTAPEA which can tell me or trace SQA users
and who are not releasing the storage?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023, 5:37 PM Allan Staller <
0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Classification: C
Classification: Confidential
test
::DISCLAIMER::
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted
Classification: Confidential
IBM has a subscription only list for SECINT PTFs. This information is not
openly published.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
rpinion865
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OpenSS
Classification: Confidential
This is a severely manual process.
The PTFS/APARS can be determined from the HOLDDATA.
The PTFs are individually orderable via ShopZ (just like any other PTF). The
only difference is that the PTF/APAR information is only available in the
HOLDDATA.
HTH,
-Origin
10th, 2024 at 3:14 PM, Allan Staller
<0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Classification: Confidential
>
> This is a severely manual process.
> The PTFS/APARS can be determined from the HOLDDATA.
>
> The PTFs are individually orderable via ShopZ (
Classification: Confidential
Suspend it and see who complains. Alternatively, t he type 8x SMF records carry
the RACF UID
(actually most of the job/dataset oriented records type 30, 14, 15), so you can
check there as well.
Select by userid and filter out what you know. That which remains is the
Each LPAR has their own.
SYSPLEX does not share (virtual or real) storage.
Selected information is shared by XCF using CTC or Coupling Facility.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@
Having run into the same problem (it seems like this is what you actually did):
From another shared image:
DEF ALIAS (NAME(PAGE) RELATE(target mcat))
DEF PGSPC NAME(PAGE. (TARG VOLSER))
ALTER (PAGE...) NEWNAME(..)) cat(target mcat)
On the "dead image"
PA PAGE=newname
NO IPL. No muss. No
Look here
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247359.html?Open
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 1:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dummy IBM EE query
Hi
I am trying to figure out which piece of
Best of luck in all of your future endeavors!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John Dawes
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: GOODBYE
G'Day,
I am about to retire and become a lazy sod for the rest of my l
I believe this is not currently a *requirement*.
My recollection is that a warning message will be issued @IPL, but the IPL will
continue.
I have not heard of this being enforced at this time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent
IIRC, Water cooling did not appear until (at the earliest) the 308x processors.
I am 99.9% positive there were no water cooled S360 or S370 processors.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Phil Smith III
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 11:37 AM
To: IB
Mainview Auto-Operator?
See:
https://communities.bmc.com/thread/30747?start=0
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: what is DSSUMON?
I have an auto-started initiato
IBM support portal should have all of the info needed.
https://www.ibm.com/support/home/
"Unsupported" means IBM does not want to help you with the diagnosis.
You should be able to download the fixes as needed.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
TSO BPXMTEXT EF096A32 will tell you exactly why the file system was not mounted.
I haven't looked, but IIRC error code 79 indicates some sort of "file not
found" (???) error.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R
Hey
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 20
I can believe Driver MCLs can take a long time on the support element.
I do not agree with the HMC updated. I have never seen a HMC upgrade take more
than a couple of hours.
My $0.02 USD worth.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: We
ignorance)
On Wed, 18 Dec, 2019, 5:42 PM Allan Staller, wrote:
> I can believe Driver MCLs can take a long time on the support element.
> I do not agree with the HMC updated. I have never seen a HMC upgrade
> take more than a couple of hours.
>
> My $0.02 USD worth.
>
F DFHSM,Q ACTIVE, look for migration held
Of you could just try F DFHSM,RELEASE ALL (or migration).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 12:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Strange Migration beha
One time setup.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 1:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Chaning time zone for Unix based tasks
Thanks
Is this a onetime setup, or would I have to do this twice a ye
The IBM 2321 was also (affectionately?) known as the "noodle snatcher".
A redesign in the S/370 generation produced the 3850 "drum storage" device.
Same basic concept w/drums instead of mag strips.
The 3850 (as well as the 2321) were both know for mangling the "back end"
storage media.
Cheer's
received
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Test
Test
_
Da
As of (IIRC) z/OS 1.12 there is a user enabled dfsms function CA_RECLAIM that
allows the use of orphaned CA's w/o need for a "offline" reorg.
Applies to VSAM KSDS. Not to Linear VSAM
HTH
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeremy Nicoll
>Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 1:28 AM
>
>I dunno about th
Isn't this the reason for group definitions.
If done properly, just connect the "new" user to the same groups as the "old"
user and all should be ok.
If not done properly, this is still a big leg up over "starting from scratch".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
DCOLLECT?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Robin Atwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 4:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: PDSE V2 data set info
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Do not click links or
open attachments u
This is documented in the AMS manual.
" Commands can begin at, or to the right of, the left margin. For batch
processing jobs, the default margins
are 2 and 72.
Commands are separated from their parameters by one or more separators (blanks,
commas, or
comments). For some parameters, parentheses
MPF exit to skim off the relevant messages.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS monitoring
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Do not
Why re-invent the wheel?
Many IBM and ISV products will already do this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Arye Shemer
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS monitoring
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside
So, what else is new?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 4:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Help with CA Software renewal
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Do not click links o
All of the hsm-ish products I am aware of, use a pseudo volser similar to dfHSM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM APIs in a multi-vendor world
[CAUTION: Th
Use the z/OS workflow for migration.
See the z/OS 2.4 documentation for ZOS/MF. It will point you to a GITHUB
repository that the workflow can be downloaded from.
IBM has in the past published "Migration" manuals. As of z/OS 2.4, the
"Migration" manuals will no longer be published.
Historically,
Unlock the userid and reset the password.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
William Boyer
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 1:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SERVAUTH (RACF CLASS) profile causing a looping CPU
[CAUTION: This Email is from ou
301 - 400 of 1077 matches
Mail list logo
