-TAiXM6fEsz59DIyqGDKkKZP_HGMy7XazMGYJZI9M4D0dYPfVp1YCD69_1N_bp2jIZ$
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 10:43 AM, Michael Babcock
wrote:
> Nope, just tried. Got an authorization error.
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:07 AM Lopez, Sharon <
> 038467b8
I'm reposting. Can others check and see if you can get on to SERVICELINK?
Thank you.
Sharon Lopez
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 2:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Any one having issues accessing
Thank you.
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in
reliance upon this information by persons or
It isn't working for me either. Is there a new address?
Thanks.
Sharon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 3:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Shopz
Thanks,
For some reason, it isn't working for
RECEIVER ORDER failing
I'm getting an FTP error. Problem probably on their end. ☹
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/E RECEIVER ORDER failing
I also
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 7:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMP/E RECEIVER ORDER failing
Is anyone else experiencing any issues Receiving maintenance from
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3
Is anyone else experiencing any issues Receiving maintenance from
https://eccgw01.boulder.ibm.com/services/projects/ecc/ws;.?
Does anyone know if the server is down?
Thanks.
Sharon Lopez
Software Systems Programming Specialist
BB now Truist - IT Production Engineering - Mainframe OS
3200
We also just recently started getting a Wait state at IPL on one of test lpar
sandboxes and nothing had changed on our system. It wasn't consistently
failing either. I opened up a case with IBM and was told to put in ESQA in
INITSQA. Of course, that resolved our issue. I just wanted it to
Data Classification: [-Internal-]
Hello,
Can anyone help with this or offer any type of suggestion? A few weeks ago we
started getting this message in our CICS DFHLOG log streams that are on dasd.
We are not aware of any conditions that changed that could have caused this.
Thanks in
My DB2 co-worker was telling me that he cannot see Level 2's respond to his SR
now with the new system. Has anyone else experienced this; is this working as
designed?
Thank you.
Sharon Lopez
Software Systems Programming Specialist
BB - IT Production Engineering - Mainframe OS
3200 Beechleaf Ct
Just a general question wondering how others share the master catalog in a
SYSPLEX. Do most of you guys share a master catalog in the sysplex or do you
have a master catalog for each lpar in the sysplex? Just thinking about single
point of failures.
Thank you.
Sharon Lopez
Software Systems
We want to install the new ICSF HCR77C1 to pick up the new function but we have
HCR77C0 installed. Why does HCR77C1 delete HCR77C0 and would I be able to back
HCR77C1 off if we need to.
The information in this transmission may contain proprietary and non-public
information of BB or its
When we upgraded to z/OS 2.3, we started getting the error message out in our
CPCS software. This message wasn't occurring before. It isn't causing an
issue that we are aware of, but it is definitely creating a lot of messages.
CPCS software is old and no changes have been made to it. Has
The TSO SEND command definitely appends the userid at the end Is there an
option to turn that off?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 2:26 AM
To:
;
END
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX question
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:26:51 +, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
>We
We have a CHANGEMAN REXX exec that issues this:
+CMNNEWCO F PRODAORB,CEMT SET PROG(DPLDB2IR) PH
but now it is appending the userid to the end:
+CMNNEWCO F PRODAORB,CEMT SET PROG(DPLDB2IR) PH CMNBATCH
Has anyone seen anything like this before? The REXX hasn't changed.
Thank you.
The
We are trying to do HMC (2.12.0) user authentication via LDAP server. I have
necessary information for the HMC "Edit Enterprise Directory (LDAP) Server"
panel but need to enter a search filter. It looks like I need to put the '{0}'
somewhere in the search pattern. My server people say I need to
Does anyone know if this product, Automatic Binary Optimizer, will actually
migrate Cobol V4 to V6 for you? Our IBM reps are telling us that it will
actually do the migration for you. Based on what I've read, it is a
performance product and I didn't see that capability.
Thanks to everyone in
I know there has been a lot on here about the new versions of Cobol and PDS/E.
I need some understanding, please. We have a development lpar (SYSPLEX)
sharing dasd with production lpar SYSPLEX. Will we be able to FTP the
development load mod to the production lpar?
Thank you.
Receive FROMNETWORK
On 9/14/2016 4:08 PM, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
> We are trying to SMP/E RECEIVE FROMNETWORK and we are getting the
> message that SSL is mandatory. Does anyone have any sample JCL they
> would like to share? Did the entire process change?
Read this, and it should an
Subject: Re: SMP/E Receive FROMNETWORK
Have you setup ftps or https for SMP/E downloads?
> Lopez, Sharon <mailto:sharon.lo...@nc.gov> September 14, 2016 at 4:08
> PM We are trying to SMP/E RECEIVE FROMNETWORK and we are getting the
> message that SSL is mandatory. Does anyone have
We are trying to SMP/E RECEIVE FROMNETWORK and we are getting the message that
SSL is mandatory. Does anyone have any sample JCL they would like to share?
Did the entire process change?
Thanks in advance.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be
; or tinyurl
>
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/p64hluq
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:20 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@
Have a lot of shops migrated to COBOL V5/V6? Does anyone have a project plan
they would like to share with me? Is the IEFOPZxx member only available in
z/OS 2.2?
Thanks to everyone in advance.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to
We migrated 4 production lpars from z/OS 1.13 to z/OS 2.1 and didn't notice a
change in Private storage. Today, we migrated our last production lpar and
noticed that we lost about 1M private. We also did a dynamic I/O gen today.
What parameters do I need to change to get back the 1M of
Thank you. I guess I just trying to find out which products actually have
their own IEFU* exits. We only found one at IPL time that was being loaded and
that was ZEKE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus
We have IEFU83, IEFU84, and IEFU85 in our SMFPRMxx members. They have been
there for a long time (long before me) and I'm trying to determine if they are
actually being called/used. Is there any way to determine this? It looks like
we have the defaults that came with z/OS in SYS1.LPALIB and
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: UNIX ZFS clone question
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Lopez, Sharon <sharon.lo...@nc.gov> wrote:
> I have a weird scenario and wondering if anyone else has seen this.
> I'm preparing to go to z/OS 2.1. I'm cloning my current var zfs using
> DFDSS COPY DAT
I have a weird scenario and wondering if anyone else has seen this. I'm
preparing to go to z/OS 2.1. I'm cloning my current var zfs using DFDSS COPY
DATASET (like I've always done for many, many years). Anyway, it looks like
the files under CRON aren't being copied. This is my z/OS 1.13
Does anyone remember when IEAIPSxx member went away?
Thanks.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized state official.
Just curious to see how many have implemented z/OSMF and do you use it for
software management?
Thanks in advance!
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:09:49 -0500, Mark Zelden <m...@mzelden.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:02:07 +0000, Lopez, Sharon <sharon.lo...@nc.gov> wrote:
>
>>We have noticed that our dumping for SMF MAN files are taking longer than
>>usual. We see in the job log that
We have noticed that our dumping for SMF MAN files are taking longer than
usual. We see in the job log that when message IEC205I is issued, which shows
the total blocks written, that sometimes it takes as long as 15 minutes for
message IEF234E K to occur. Has anyone else encountered this or
A federal agency changed to TLS v1.2 over the weekend and now we are not able
to connect to them via CICS 5.2. We have on the TLS V1.2 ptf for z/OS 1.13 and
we are starting with the correct SIT within CICS. We are missing something but
cannot figure this out. Anyone else experiencing this?
Do others use IPCS instead of systems programmers? I always thought of it as a
system's programmers tool but now we have application developers that want
access to it. What are the risks of giving access to developers?
Thanks in advance.
Email
Have a lot of people gone to Connect/Direct 5.2? Do you have to use the TLS
protocol and what are your experiences?
Thanks in advance.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
Does anyone know when the z/EC12 will be end of marketing and end of support?
Thanks in advance!
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized state
Does anyone have any experiences (good or bad) with secondary maintenance type
companies that will support IBM mainframes?
Thanks to everyone in advance.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and
This is the answer from IBM; just in case anyone else might be experiencing
this:
Due to recently added IFREQs, the ServerPac RESTORE job is not getting
generated correctly, causing the errors. ServerPac development is
currently in the process of fixing the RESTORE job generation error. As
a
I saw that someone else had posted this same thing back in August; but I did
not see a resolution. Has anyone else encountered this with the RESTORE job in
the z/OS 2.1 Serverpac Install. I've opened up a ticket with IBM but being the
impatient type, I thought I would ask the LIST-SERVE.
What console controllers does everyone use to share consoles across multiple
data centers? Are most people using OSA, Visara controllers, etc?
Thank you.
Sharon Lopez
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public
Is there a manual or a red book that outlines all of the steps needed to
implement FIPS 140-2 compliant on the mainframe?
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
I already posted this question to IBM but wanted to find out if others are
getting this request from their auditors.
Our auditors want to be able to display the RSU or maintenance level of our
z/OS system. To my knowledge, there is no way to do that (IBM has also
agreed). Does anyone know if
How does one do a stand-alone restore with no tape drives attached?
Thank you.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized state official.
What do most companies use for their RACF reporting/analysis tool? Are there
any others that are comparable to Vanguard?
Thank you.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
What are the majority of companies using for their mainframe scheduling
software? Any concerns with ASG (ZEKE/ZEBB) filing for bankruptcy?
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be
What do you guys recommend or use for your catalog recovery software? I know
that that Dino software and Rocket software have some good products; but are
there others out there?
Thank you.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
What are most people using for multifactor authentication in a z/OS
environment? Does RACF have the ability?
Thank you.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
Has anyone experienced any issues with 3490 devices while running on z/OS 1.13?
Our mounts are just sitting there and we have to cancel the jobs; our virtual
tapes (3590) work fine.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public
] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.13 and 3490 tape drives
Has anyone experienced any issues with 3490 devices while running on z/OS 1.13?
Our mounts are just sitting there and we have to cancel the jobs; our virtual
] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.13 and 3490 tape drives
We are getting
*IEF233A M 0D61,PRIVAT,SL,TS00P43T,STEP0,SCCTSO.TS00P43.JCLLIB
and the tape drive is ready.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
We have just migrated our test lpar to z/OS 1.13 and we are having a problem
with HOD. We have a ticket opened with HOD support but it will probably be
transferred to z/OS HTTP. We set up a trace and it shows a handshake error and
this error:
Thd-7 ERROR default_setsocketoptions(): setsockopt
Has anyone migrated to Enterprise Cobol 5.1 from earlier enterprise releases?
I guess that I was really surprised that it will not run on z/OS 1.12 and that
the executables can only reside in a PDSE. Am I understanding this correctly?
Sharon Lopez
z/OS Systems Programmer
N.C. Office of
We are installing a Zec12 and trying to IPL out test systems. We do not have
the STP configured yet, but we are just trying to ipl the sysplex. We are
getting the message IXC434I:
IXC434I SYSTEM SYSC HAS TIMING DEFINITIONS THAT ARE NOT
CONSISTENT WITH THE OTHER ACTIVE SYSTEMS IN
We have 9 mod-9 page datasets that are over 50% in useMQ Broker using most
of this storage. Has anyone experienced anything like this?
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be
I have a quick question on how everyone puts on maintenance to products that
require PDS/Es, dynamically. I have a product CA-SYSVIEW where the
loadlib is in lnklst and shared across 5 lpars in a sysplex. I want to update
members from one of the lpars, but when I try, I get an abend
of z/OS are you running? I am guessing you got an S213-70? Or
could you tell us the 213-xx number?
There were fixes in the past for PDSE and sharing.
Is this the first PDSE you are sharing? Is this the first time for SYSVIEW?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo
57 matches
Mail list logo
