Trying to get this up and running with all plugins. All steps go well
including the -finish step and the step to add the plugins with the
overridefile. I start IZUSVR1 up and wait to start the browser interface.
After I see the stc quiet down I launch the browser only to see the core apps
y
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-302-7535 Office
> robin...@sce.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tracy Adams
>
Thanks Kurt, yes I did run the generated script to add the RACF definitions for
each plugin. I verified within RACF that the definitions are there.
What is puzzling me is the "active_configuration.cfg" shows the flags of the
plugins as IZU_RMF_CONFIGURE=N. What I have picked up in my reading
So what I found is that the UI90034 ptf was applied back in January during the
monthly compliance maintenance round and the ptf actions must have been
bypassed as the steps to complete the migration from V2r1 to V2r1 with the ptf
were not completed. The bottom line is this ptf requires you to
, Tracy Adams <tad...@fbbrands.com> wrote:
>I am new to RACF so I apologize for stupid questions...
>
>I am running a REXX script under USS to clone the HFS/ZFS files from one
>system to another. IBM provides a nice sample called copytree in the
>/samples/ dir of USS. This
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Harminc
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New to RACF
On 21 April 2016 at 12:01, Tracy Adams <tad...@fbbrands.com> wrote:
> seteuid 0
> Error codes: 0 -1 A4 B7F1C00
> EMVSSAF2ERR: SAF/RACF error
>
>
I am new to RACF so I apologize for stupid questions...
I am running a REXX script under USS to clone the HFS/ZFS files from one system
to another. IBM provides a nice sample called copytree in the /samples/ dir of
USS. This utility has run fine for us in the past. Now when I execute it with
, there is a list for RACF
To join, if you have not done so, use this URL
RACFhttp://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/racf-l.html
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Tracy Adams
> Sent: Thursday, April 2
!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 1:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New to RACF
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:50:20 +, Tracy Adams <tad...@fbbrands.com> wrote:
>
Thank you all for chiming in! Yeah the bottom line... figure out why those sub
second transactions get stalled! Hard to tune your way out of a locking
condition :-)
I will check out the SYSSTC actual velocity... that is a good bench mark to
what my max achievable would be around.
Happy
So here is my issue:
We have a soft capped LPAR that runs our DB2 and CICS regions and during the
day some "marketing batch". On Wednesdays, the marketing batch (online submit
via CICS) increases and by afternoon we hit our 4 hour soft cap. Once or twice
while we are capped, the busiest CICS
.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Podcast Series (With Marna Walle):
https://developer.ibm.com/tv/category/mpt/
From: Tracy Adams <tad...@fbbrands.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 28/04/2016 19:22
Subject:WLM issue with a proposed sol
If you remember I had a situation where the CPU was hitting its four hour avg
and soft capping itself. When this happens CICS and DB2 aren't allowed to flex
above and I get max socket errors within the busiest CICS. At the advice of
the group I set up a resource group and associated to a
So at what point with the service class get restricted based on the resource
group settings?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
right path?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Tracy Adams <tad...@fbbrands.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: OMVS (TCPIP) internals question
I am trying to understand
I am trying to understand the function of TCPIP and its "max sockets". We are
experiencing a problem that happens infrequently where our CICS application
closing down the DataPower port with an error that indicates max sockets has
been reached. IBM support has confirmed this in a dump. They
Yeah, appears to be a problem on the ibm side... the same job that ran Friday
and got a space error today returns "SSL Required" :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:49 AM
I am reading the 110 records with SAS and I want to extract the pertinent cpu
time fields from the connector records... I have figured out looping of the
connectors and mapping to the dictionary and have determined the first field I
want (cpu dispatch time) is at +480. The CICS documentation
Hi there all,
Pardon my lack of experience with XCF but I lived in a UNI shell for years now
I am enlightened to the world of XCF. I am wondering what could be wrong here
and looking for your suggestions on where to go...
Back ground: we were running two 196's using escon CTC connections
faster to open an SR/PMR with IBM XCF. That way IBM can
> determine if there is a bug or configuration issue for you
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of
For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching
priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain
functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I
really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA
Awesome, thanks for sharing in advance.
We did get the key to work finally... it was a permissions issue! Thanks all!!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 10:01 AM
To:
I have a vendor that sent me a "public" key so they can SFTP into our mainframe
from a Linux box without have to supply the RACF password. Yes they can sign
in with a password and all works fine. I am new to RACF and loading keys and
the whole SFTP / ssh thing so bear with me!
When I look at
Thanks Mark and Allan!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF and public keys
>>> On 3/1/2017 at 02:04 PM, Tracy A
So I am built a new master catalog for the 2.2 migration. I have some sys1.
Datasets that live on various sms volumes that I want add catalog entries to in
my new mastcat. If I just use IDCAMS define nonvsam I get a good entry but
there is no SMS information. I can't use "recatalog" because
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 4:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: simple questions on migrating to a new mastercat
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:23:25 +, Tracy Adams wrote:
>So I am built a new master catalog for the 2.2 migrat
-Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Tracy Adams
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:44 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Brylane GDG zap for 2.2
>
> Looking for the Brylane GDG za
Looking for the Brylane GDG zap for Z/OS 2.2 with ptf UA82857. Can someone
share?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Posting here and posting on the CICS-Listserv:
Does anyone have a working copy of the CICS exit XMNOUT that would share? I
just want to suppress SMF records from the QMSG transaction.
TIA, Tracy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
29 matches
Mail list logo
