The only way to transfer the CDS info is to allocate a new set and go through
the process to transfer/switch over to new CDS files.
We finished zos 2.4 about 3 months ago and the only concern was to make a
backup of the CDS in case of a backout due toTsome changes that affected the
size of some
Jake,
The more common issues with this kind of behavior is that probably migration is
held or there are no tape tasks assigned.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 10:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subjec
I work for a Bank and MFA was implemented several months ago. It was very
smooth for the most part.
One of the issues we ran into was our DR exercise, the MFA software did not
work on the DR recovered system since we usually do some SMS work in the first
IPL; we had to keep our "old" password a
Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:05 AM, Hervey Martinez
wrote:
> We need to expand the MCDS and are leaning towards using a mod-27 volume to
> resize and keeping a sing
then split into multiple clusters.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Expanding DFHSM MCDS
We need to expand the MCDS and are
We need to expand the MCDS and are leaning towards using a mod-27 volume to
resize and keeping a single cluster. I've done some reading and have not seen
anything about whether this can be done. Anybody out there done this?
Hervey
Hi Jake,
One of the segment in hsm is expanding but not sure if this will be a problem
for you since the issue affects the sharing LPAR. So, if you have more than one
LPAR and one of these is upgraded; then, a toleration PTF has to be applied to
the LPAR that does not upgrade; otherwise, a soc4
Mike,
Yes, you should be able to delete the logs outside of hsm. I don't think it
keeps track of those. The log retention is usually governed ty the management
class; so, look into that.
To check the space on hsm cds files: HSEND Q CDS
That command will give the the space allocation of the ocd
Hi Chuck,
So, what you're saying is that the command ignored management class attributes
for each of these files?
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Chuck Kreiter
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 1:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: H
ed to be RLS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 12:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Multi-volume HSM MCDS
The MCDS is taking up a full mod-9 and it is growing.
/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.arci000/mvcds.htm
You probably have to change your startup JCL for DFHSM
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Hervey Martinez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 10:51 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
&
The MCDS is taking up a full mod-9 and it is growing.
I'm looking at expanding the file to be multi-volume and wondering if this can
be done without converting CDS to RLS? Done some searches but don't really
come up with anything.
How would this be expanded to multi-volume. Would the definitio
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
Well, the DFSMS manual states that RECORG=FS is valid. Once again, this issue
is in creating a test c
Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Hervey Martinez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 8:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
>
> We don't have a problem defining or converting files.
>
> The issue is in ISMF. It will not recognize the FS for
you want to use it for your process.
Please post the documentation that requires the use of RECORG for this process.
This does not make sense to me.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Hervey Martinez
> Sent: Wednesday, Decembe
: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 2:15 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=FS
>
> A zFS is a specially formatted VSAM LDS. How are you creating the ZFS?
>
> Hervey Martinez wrote on 12/11/18 3:59 PM:
>
> Working on HFS to ZFS conversion and the DFSMS manual f
g the utility I had posted
previously - no need to define the ZFS beforehand the utility will do this for
you
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Hervey Martinez"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:35:28 AM
Subject: Re: ZFS RECORG=F
LDS. How are you creating the ZFS?
Hervey Martinez wrote on 12/11/18 3:59 PM:
Working on HFS to ZFS conversion and the DFSMS manual for zos 2.3 mentions the
RECORG=FS to be used for ZFS files.
In creating a test case in ISMF, it does not recognize this parm and it give an
error. i did add this to
Working on HFS to ZFS conversion and the DFSMS manual for zos 2.3 mentions the
RECORG=FS to be used for ZFS files.
In creating a test case in ISMF, it does not recognize this parm and it give an
error. i did add this to the ACS routines and we are able to allocate a ZFS and
convert an HFS to ZF
We had a Luminex library for our small mainframe shop. i was not impressed with
the support. I'm not sure if that was due to the contract we had or the company
in general.
Hervey
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Todd Burrell
Sent: Friday, Se
esday, July 11, 2018 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC614I Scratch
One of the parmlb datasets. If you have command access, issue a D PARMLIB
command for the list of datasets in use. You can also issue a D MPF command
which should show the active list too.
Hervey Martinez wrote
being suppressed either using MPFLSTxx or AutoOps? Either one can prevent
the message from being written to the log.
Hervey Martinez wrote on 7/9/18 2:39 PM:
We have instances where some GDG files don't get deleted while these are in
ML1; thus, they end up generating errors during Seco
We have instances where some GDG files don't get deleted while these are in
ML1; thus, they end up generating errors during Secondary Space Management
generating a RC=20 RSN=98.
I opened a ticket with IBM and they tell me that there should be an IEC614I
Scratch message being generated and this
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Hervey Martinez wrote:
> We had an issue where an online was had problems due to space.
>
> The VSAM file had 50 extents across 12 volumes and had several candidate
> volumes available with plenty of space. The error IEC070I 209-220.
>
> A file
We had an issue where an online was had problems due to space.
The VSAM file had 50 extents across 12 volumes and had several candidate
volumes available with plenty of space. The error IEC070I 209-220.
A file was migrated off of one volume that the VSAM file was currently using.
Several years
A.EDU
Subject: Re: ARC0734i rc=20 reason=98
GDS=EXPIRED vs GDS=MIGRATE in the SMS management class?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subjec
n Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Hervey Martinez
wrote:
> Well, all files that I've seen are GDG files. This is very puzzling. There
> are a few of these errors that happen every so often but have no idea what
> is causing them.
>
Oh, I've had that problem. Look at the GD
l" dataset).
This will resolve the issue.
As to why, there are too many variables to spend a great deal of time
speculating.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017
We have several datasets that show up in HSM's miglog file. I know the problem
is that the file is not cataloged and is the reason for the error. My question
is: What causes these files to become uncataloged?
I've read a few other posts about the HSM address space being cancelled due to
errors
may have changed.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 1:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question about management class autobackup=y
We have several files tha
We have several files that are receiving RC=53 and the management class has
autobackup=y. The help panel in ISMF, describes this field as, "Automatic
backup is allowed" but since these files are erroring that means that "backup
are required".
We don't run HSM backups since we rely on FDR for th
on virtual tape. I have 300GB tape files defined.
But if a file is only 100KB then that is all that is used. I no longer waste a
whole 300GB tape.
Hope this helps.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> O
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Hervey Martinez
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:18 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM ML2 on disk
>
> Just wondering if any of you out there have converted your Mainframe
*
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Hervey Martinez <
hervey.marti...@custserv.com> wrote:
> Just wondering if any of you out there have converted your Mainframe's
> HSM
> ML2 from tape to disk? If so, what are the pitfalls? A quick search of
> Google did not yield much; s
Just wondering if any of you out there have converted your Mainframe's HSM ML2
from tape to disk? If so, what are the pitfalls? A quick search of Google did
not yield much; so, just wondering if anybody has done this.
Regards,
Hervey
Storage Administrator
-
Using the operator command: /d u,,,,##
Where is the starting UCB address and ## will be the number of consecutive
addresses to display.
For example: the command /d u,,,1000,16 will display all addresses
starting with unit 1000 thru unit 100f and this info will be in the log. T
Jake,
The alias' are in the master catalog not in the user catalog. If you have
multiple master catalogs, then the user cat needs to be detached from the other
masters before you do the resize and after the re-org; then, it has to be
re-connected back to those same masters.
Regards,
Hervey
Anybody out there use or have converted to CA-Allocate? If so, can you share
your opinion on the product? I've been looking for reviews of the product and
just don't seem to find anything.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
We run EXPIREBV only on weekends and we let it run all day long along with all
HSM functions and have never had an issue. We've been running this way for
several years.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
In ISPF 3.4, put in the '/' on the line for "include additional qualifiers"
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of mf db
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 7:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Del
The repro/mergecat functions are very slow because all VTOCS/VVDS will need to
be updated with the new catalog name. What you want is to reorg the catalog. In
short, backup the catalog, delete the old structure, re-define it; then,
restore from backup into its new structure.
If you have a utili
Gadi,
We are about to start testing a Luminex VTS and, from everything that we've
read, it appears to be an excellent solution.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013
Hello,
We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment in
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have gone
through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered migrating
the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware? Anythi
The 3490 unit assignment could be a default being set somewhere in z/OS; if
this is the case, then you're falling through somewhere(possibly in ACS
routines) and by default z/OS assigns the default unit type.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mail
All of our z/VM volumes are formatted with ICKDSF using CPVOLUME command.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: New DASD unde
>From the message, it appears that the volume SMTP17 is an SMS volume but the
>command has FORCENONSMS. A file can be recalled to a non-sms volume..have done
>it several times.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On B
Well, it depends on whether you're running audits or not. If you're running an
audit on a regular basis, then it makes sense to "hold it" since an audit will
keep your CDSs from getting backed up.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@
Assuming that all these gdg files belong to the "same gdg base"; it's possible
that the GDG base was defined with a "noscratch"; then, when a gdg is "rolled
off" then the file would not get deleted just detached from the base but stays
on the catalog. Rolling all of these "in" is an exercise in
The file has to be reorged in order for it to pick the new dataclass attributes.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Moussadak Mostafa
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Antonio,
Do the volumes added then reclaimed or do they just stay in the SG? If this is
an occasional problem and you reclaim these newly added volumes; then, HSM's
Interval Migration might be a good tool for this type of problems. If this is
something that happens once or twice a week, then th
When we expanded the COMMDS, we did not have any issues with any LPARS while we
were switching over to the new one. Thus, I doubt that it will be a problem.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Leong, D
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFHSM Recalls and Tape
At 11:55 + on 10/11/2012, Hervey Martinez wrote about Re: DFHSM Recalls and
Tape:
>If
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFHSM Recalls and Tape
Hervey,
That is not true, at least not at this shop. HSM routinely queues recalls
according to tape volume in order to minimize tape mounts with or without CRQ.
Dave O'Brien
-Original Message-----
From: Hervey Martinez [mail
If you have CRQ(Common Recall Queue) set up, then HSM will "look ahead" and
recall all files that are on the same tape. Also, with CRQ, you can limit which
LPARS will perform recalls and limit them in that manner and all recalls will
be routed to that LPAR. Otherwise, the recalls happen one at a
We had a similar situation in our shop and we found out that HSMs Secondary
Space Management was not running to completion by looking; so, look for this
message "ARC0518I SECONDARY SPACE MANAGEMENT ENDED SUCCESSFULLY". Also, Make
sure that the files have backups if these are called for by the ma
Normally, the expired datasets are cleaned up during HSM's Primary & Secondary
Space management. What time do these run in your shop?
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Uriel Carrasquilla
Sent: Friday,
The management class has the expiration information.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Uriel Carrasquilla
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Willie,
The problem is not the migrated file, it just happens to be that the tape has a
bad spot and it happens to be the spot where this file is physically on the
tape; thus, you can't get past it.
You should mark the tape full to keep it from being written to again; Then, you
can:
1) just si
To get a somewhat close guesstimate, you can drop the least significant digits
to go from KB to MB, then to GB.
Thus, if you have something like 123456789 KB; then, to guesstimate the number
of MB you drop the last 3 digits; thus, you have 123456 MB; then to take this
to GB you drop the next 3
In ISPF 3.4 when you enter the VSAM name, then, the VSAM filenames are
displayed, you should be able to do a "del / nos" and you may need to do this
to the data & index components; but you need Storage admin privileges to do
this; if you dont, contact your storage person.
You will not be able t
60 matches
Mail list logo
