bject: (External):Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
W dniu 2016-09-02 o 00:25, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
> A snippet from my IGDSMSxx:
>
> PDSE_MONITOR(YES,120,30) /* RECOMMENDED BY LVL3 */
> PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) /* AS OF Z/OS 1.6 */
> PDSE1_MONITOR(YES,12
W dniu 2016-09-02 o 00:25, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
A snippet from my IGDSMSxx:
PDSE_MONITOR(YES,120,30) /* RECOMMENDED BY LVL3 */
PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) /* AS OF Z/OS 1.6 */
PDSE1_MONITOR(YES,120,30)/* RECOMMENDED BY LVL3 */
.
I stand corrected.
The statement
):Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
For record purposes: IGDSMSxx still does not allow comments, as far as I
understand the documentation.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
For record purposes: IGDSMSxx still does not allow comments, as far as I
understand the documentation.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie
016 2:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
IMHO there should be a Health Check for whole parmlib, that means all members
from Tuning Ref.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
W dniu 2016-08-24 o 15:11, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
Charles Mills wrote:
Plus, are there not third-party PARMLIB syntax checkers which would have been
broken by the change?
There are some syntax checkers from IBM, but only for *certain* parmlib members:
CEEPRMxx, LOADxx and GRSRNLXX checke
Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subje
Charles Mills wrote:
>Plus, are there not third-party PARMLIB syntax checkers which would have been
>broken by the change?
There are some syntax checkers from IBM, but only for *certain* parmlib members:
CEEPRMxx, LOADxx and GRSRNLXX checked by 'Parmlib Processing tool' and
'Symbolic Parmlib P
tedly falls way short of perfect.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Gould
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Cheryl:
> On Aug 23
>This was one of our big SHARE requirements and we worked hard at it.
>You should be able to put comments in any SYS1.PARMLIB member now. If
>you find a member that's not supported, please let us know.
I would not have said that the thrust was necessarily about
"any...member". Support for many
Cheryl:
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Cheryl Watson wrote:
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> Regarding "Letting IBM off with variations is nonsense.", I choose to think
> of it as being pragmatic. I can complain all day about how IBM's reduction
> of staff is hurting the mainframe, but the fact is that they
: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Hi Ed,
Regarding "Letting IBM off with variations is nonsense.", I choose to think of
it as being pragmatic. I can complain all day about how IBM's reduction of
staff is hurting the mainframe, but the fact is that they are doing it despite
anything I
> =========
>
> I hope this help,
> Cheryl
>
> Cheryl Watson
> Watson & Walker, Inc.
> www.watsonwalker.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On B
RM00 don't allow any comments.
>
> RECOMMENDATION: Apply the PTF and start adding comments to these
> long-neglected parmlib members.
> =
>
> I hope this help,
> Cheryl
>
> Cheryl Watson
> Watson & Walker, Inc.
&g
Use the REXX approach. Start with a comment that signals that the new standard
syntax is being used.
/* CARDINAL SYNTAX */
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 12:08, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
> But how would you switch over to the new syntax?
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Paul Gilma
On 8/23/2016 8:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Wouldn't that resource (and the customers') have been more productively
spent in making the syntax uniform? Use Utilities commands as a model.
Not according to IBM. It was this or nothing.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Pa
On 8/23/2016 11:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:02:30 -0400, Cheryl Watson wrote:
It's true that not all Parmlib members support the same format, but the Init
& Tuning Guide has been updated to show which type of comments are allowed
in each member.
Wouldn't that resource
But how would you switch over to the new syntax?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:02:30 -0400, Cheryl Watson wrote:
>>
>>It's true that not all Parmlib members support the same format, but the Init
>>&
On 8/23/2016 7:01 AM, Tom Conley wrote:
This was one of our big SHARE requirements and we worked hard at it.
You should be able to put comments in any SYS1.PARMLIB member now. If
you find a member that's not supported, please let us know.
What he said!
Also, if your company is a SHARE memb
595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cheryl Watson
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 7:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Hi all,
M
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:02:30 -0400, Cheryl Watson wrote:
>
>It's true that not all Parmlib members support the same format, but the Init
>& Tuning Guide has been updated to show which type of comments are allowed
>in each member.
>
Wouldn't that resource (and the customers') have been more product
:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
THANK YOU - this is great information.
--
Lionel B. Dyck (TRA Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer
Enterprise Infrastructure Support
Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cheryl Watson
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Hi all,
Most of the problems have been in the older members, but i
ehalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>This has probably been asked before, but a quick search of the archives did
>not yield the results I was looking for.
>Do a
Cheryl Watson wrote:
>I just LOVE this APAR!
No comments... ;-)
Sorry, Cheryl, but I really *love* your post. Please continue with your nice
posts.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
r, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
I thought there was a push by IBM to allow comments in all members. I
thought the last few members that could not have comments now allow
comments. As an example I know the COMMNDx
On 8/23/2016 9:10 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
This has probably been asked before, but a quick search of the archives did not
yield the results I was looking for.
Do all members of SYS1.PARMLIB now support /* */ commenting?
z/OS' 2.1 and 2.2 installed.
Bob
This was one of our big SHAR
t 23, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
I am sure there was / is.. but apparently standards are inconsistent other than
what is documented member by member.
Rob Schramm
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 9:43 AM Feller, Paul
wrote:
> I thought there was a p
t; -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 08:26
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
>
> This is because ther
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
Sent: 23 August, 2016 15:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Sadly no
--
Lionel B. Dyck (TRA Contractor
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>This has probably been asked before, but a quick search of the archives did
>not yield the results I was looking for.
>Do all members of SYS1.PARMLIB now support /* */ commenting?
No. There is only one standard with this name: 'NO STANDARDS' ;-)
IEASYSxx has th
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
Sent: 23 August, 2016 15:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
Sadly no
--
Lionel B. Dyck (TRA Contractor)
Mainframe
ainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB
This has probably been asked before, but a quick search of the archives did not
yield the r
This has probably been asked before, but a quick search of the archives did not
yield the results I was looking for.
Do all members of SYS1.PARMLIB now support /* */ commenting?
z/OS' 2.1 and 2.2 installed.
Bob
--
For IBM-MA
34 matches
Mail list logo
