On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:20:37 +, Rob Scott wrote:
I seem to recall that common/shared memory objects are associated with the
RASP address space rather than *MASTER*.
There are a non-trivial amount of ISV software products that squirrel stuff
away in ASID(1) off existing TCBs and some even
That would be contrary to the definition and purpose of a dataspace. I can see
(possibly) an anchor, but not the dataspace itself.
snip
Martin, how about Dataspaces? *MASTER* does own quite a few of them!! One of
our systems currently has 1.2Gb lodged against MASTER, which whilst not quite
Perhaps some clarification of where the 'large memory numbers' are being
reported from by the OP.
In my site, looking at *MASTER* REAL usage, both in SDSF DA and RMF3 STORF,
appear to account for real memory frames held by dataspaces owned by that
ASID (which makes sense, as where else would they
How about NETVIEW for the growth of storage in *Master*. The CANZLOG can use
(without the TINYDS option) , a 2G dataspace. As soon as we installed NETVIEW
V6R1 the MASTER grew even though we now use the TINYDS option.
--
For
Almost a year ago in
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/bad_data_and_the_subjunctive_mood?lang=en
I talked about seeing large numbers for memory in MSTJCL00.
At the time I got no takers as to what it could be. So I'm trying again
here...
... Is MSTJCL00 the
General thoughts with no hard data behind them. I.E. SWAGs
1) MSTJCL00 (i.e. *MASTER*) has been flagged by WLM as Storage Critical. Check
w/WLM development.
2) Turn on the VSM* parameters in SYS1.PARMLIB(DIAG*) for data gathering. View
w/IPCS and/or RMF.
Not sure what (if any) RSM*
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
General thoughts with no hard data behind them. I.E. SWAGs
1) MSTJCL00 (i.e. *MASTER*) has been flagged by WLM as Storage
: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Kenneth Wilkerson redb...@austin.rr.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 09/16/2013 02:38 PM
Subject:Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Martin Packer wrote:
Almost a year ago in
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/bad_data_and_the_subjunctive_mood?lang=en
I talked about seeing large numbers for memory in MSTJCL00.
On what are you graph on that web page based? From what memory areas are those
September 2013 11:55
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
Almost a year ago in
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/bad_data_and_the_subjunctive_mood?lang=en
I talked about seeing large numbers for memory in MSTJCL00
/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 09/16/2013 03:01 PM
Subject:Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Martin Packer
.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
Good questions. To try and answer them...
1) Type
:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?
Good questions. To try and answer them...
1) Type 30 memory usage - not virtual.
2) I used to not see MSTJCL00 show up as a significant memory item
compared to, say, System Logger. Now I see it sometimes over
13 matches
Mail list logo
