I do have the VM spooled output from "D T0.10"
I need to check on APAR OW56730 (PTF UA01439 for OS/390 2.10).
Tony Thigpen
Jim Mulder wrote on 09/25/2015 01:43 AM:
In a DR site, we are 'playing' with a customers OS/390 2.10 under z/VM
6.3 on a z10.
Their system was running with
Www-3.ibm.com/systems/z/os/support/zos_server.htm
Shows the z990 as the newest processor to support OS/390 2.10.
HTH,
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2015, at 5:16 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>> The earliest version of MVS (sic) that is advertised
>> to support
Well, with the z800 compatibility feature installed, it runs on a z10.
As long as we use ARCHLVL=1. :-)
Tony Thigpen
Linda wrote on 09/25/2015 12:36 PM:
Www-3.ibm.com/systems/z/os/support/zos_server.htm
Shows the z990 as the newest processor to support OS/390 2.10.
HTH,
Linda
Sent from my
W dniu 2015-09-25 o 18:36, Linda pisze:
Www-3.ibm.com/systems/z/os/support/zos_server.htm
Shows the z990 as the newest processor to support OS/390 2.10.
HTH,
Linda
Some people claimed they ran OS/390 2.10 on z9 or even z10.
Supported <> working.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:43:41 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
> Thinking about such things is more productive with stand-alone dump
>at which to gaze.
My recollection of SADump at OS/390 2.10 (and z/OS 1.1 for that matter) in
64-bit is less than happy. Me-thinks we had a discussion about memory not
Shane Ginnane wrote:
>As it happens I have a set of 2.10 CDs (yep real sparkling disks that work a
>treat for keeping the birds off the tomatoes) - updated for 64-bit even.
Or use them to keep animals running into fences if you have no paint cans lids
to use. LaserDiscs, CDs, DVDs, Blu-rays,
>The earliest version of MVS (sic) that is advertised
>to support ARCHLVL=2 is z/OS 1.6
Not true. z/OS 1.6 is the earliest release to require z/Architecture
(i.e., ARCHLVL=2).
OS/390 R10 introduced ARCHLVL=2 as an option.
>IEA304W SYSTEM WAIT STATE CODE 80009064 DURING IEAVNPF5 INITIALIZATION
In a DR site, we are 'playing' with a customers OS/390 2.10 under z/VM
6.3 on a z10.
Their system was running with ARCHLVL=1, but we were having some
performance issues, so we decided to see what would happen with ARCHLVL=2.
The initial IPL trucks along until it the console switches modes.
Anthony Thompson wrote:
>The earliest version of MVS (sic) that is advertised to support
>ARCHLVL=2 is z/OS 1.6
A correction: z/OS 1.6 was the first release of z/OS to *require* ARCHLVL 2
(i.e. z/Architecture and 64-bit). OS/390 2.10 through z/OS 1.5 (inclusive)
were bimodal and advertised as
> In a DR site, we are 'playing' with a customers OS/390 2.10 under z/VM
> 6.3 on a z10.
>
> Their system was running with ARCHLVL=1, but we were having some
> performance issues, so we decided to see what would happen with
ARCHLVL=2.
>
> The initial IPL trucks along until it the console
I stand corrected! Thanks Timothy.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OS/390 hard wait
Anthony Thompson wrote
: OS/390 hard wait
In a DR site, we are 'playing' with a customers OS/390 2.10 under z/VM
6.3 on a z10.
Their system was running with ARCHLVL=1, but we were having some performance
issues, so we decided to see what would happen with ARCHLVL=2.
The initial IPL trucks along until it the console
12 matches
Mail list logo