from my
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Martin Packer
Date: 3/14/24 12:10 (GMT-05:00) To:
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: WLM and DDF enclaves They should be below
Db2 Engine in the hierarchy…IRLM should be in SYSSTC.DBM1, MSTR, DIST should
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jaime Fernandez <05f045ad6641-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Date: Thursday, 14 March 2024 at 14:26
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] WLM and DDF enclaves
Hi fellow listers,
Newcomer here, so... I hope my question makes sens
You might try to get WLM/RMF reports on response times to get a base line
Colin
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 14:26, Jaime Fernandez <
05f045ad6641-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi fellow listers,
>
> Newcomer here, so... I hope my question makes sense.
>
> We have so
Hi fellow listers,
Newcomer here, so... I hope my question makes sense.
We have some amount of business critical distributed online transactions,
running on enclaves into a Db2 zOS subsystem. Our current WLM configuration
assigns them a specific service class with importance 1 and a velocity
Well, a significant portion of the value proposition for WLM when it was
introduced in the mid 90s was in fact to eliminate the static assignment of
dispatching priorities and the fact that WLM would potentially adjust the
dispatching priorities every 10 seconds to attempt to balance
Hello
I must confess that I am not a WLM expert but I just wanted to understand
how this works
In our environment we have few started where their Service class(Velocity)
and Dispatch priority keeps changing on its own.
Based on what constraint or definition in WLM the service class and
Dispatch
from 3000 to 15000 didn't seem to have
an effect, but I was hesitant at shooting too high.
Allan: We have little to no usage of those subsystems--even CICS is pretty
lightly used. My goal is to reduce the CPU usage in the WLM & other system
address spaces because we pay for CPU cycles.
Peter:
EMAIL: Re: How to reduce the overhead of WLM?
Classification: Confidential
The most important resource in most shops is CPU and is usually the critical
factor in WLM adjustments.
Judicious user of SC period and IMPortance is far more effective in controlling
the distribution of CPU.
.
I would
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to reduce the overhead of WLM?
Classification: Confidential
The most important resource in most shops is CPU and is usually the critical
factor in WLM adjustments.
Judicious user of SC period and IMPortance is far more effective in controlling
Classification: Confidential
The most important resource in most shops is CPU and is usually the critical
factor in WLM adjustments.
Judicious user of SC period and IMPortance is far more effective in controlling
the distribution of CPU.
.
I would not overload SYSSTC with work
Would it help to have more of those address spaces in SYSSTC so that WLM
doesn't try to manage them?
--
Tom Marchant
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 01:03:27 +, Graham Harris wrote:
>A few years back, I did a deep dive into tuning CPU usage across a
>multitude of very small z/OS guests unde
Classification: Confidential
Agreed!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Anthony Hirst
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 7:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to reduce the overhead of WLM?
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside
If you are running a lot of CICS regions, you might want to look at
reducing the mastask values, my understanding is that WLM create's PB for
every possible active task in CICS and they get scanned every 250 ms too.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:15 PM Jim Mulder wrote:
> The most important th
, MQ)
This is a combination of experience and remembrance from a WLM training class.
Most people try to over-control WLM instead of letting it do its thing.\
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wendell Lovewell
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:08 PM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wendell Lovewell
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 6:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: How to reduce the overhead of WLM?
This is probably a strange question, but is there a way to reduce WLM cpu
usage? Here's
A few years back, I did a deep dive into tuning CPU usage across a
multitude of very small z/OS guests under z/VM, and WLM was certainly a big
hitter for many of them, but as there were so many instances, I was able to
see notable differences in WLM use between "LPARs", which was
This is probably a strange question, but is there a way to reduce WLM cpu
usage? Here's the situation:
- The system is a lightly used development system. Unless something is in a
loop (very rare), CPU % probably is usually less than 10%. And except for
system regions & CICS, it's
processors.
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 11:57, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> On 5/11/2023 1:08 PM, Colin Paice wrote:
> > We are setting up z/OSMF for the 1st time (can't really avoid it any
> > longer). I've noticed that the IZUANG1 task has a default WLM SC of
> SYSSTC
> > (which is probably O
On 5/11/2023 1:08 PM, Colin Paice wrote:
We are setting up z/OSMF for the 1st time (can't really avoid it any
longer). I've noticed that the IZUANG1 task has a default WLM SC of SYSSTC
(which is probably OK), but the IZUSVR1 task has a default of Discretionary
- which is probably NOT OK. Do you
> We are setting up z/OSMF for the 1st time (can't really avoid it any
> longer). I've noticed that the IZUANG1 task has a default WLM SC of SYSSTC
> (which is probably OK), but the IZUSVR1 task has a default of Discretionary
> - which is probably NOT OK. Do you have a recommendation for
I was asked
We are setting up z/OSMF for the 1st time (can't really avoid it any
longer). I've noticed that the IZUANG1 task has a default WLM SC of SYSSTC
(which is probably OK), but the IZUSVR1 task has a default of Discretionary
- which is probably NOT OK. Do you have a recommendation
Woo-hoo! Yes, the context came through. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WLM Couple dataset?
Hi Rex,
No worries, I want my
om: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Matthew Stitt
>Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 10:35 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WLM Couple dataset?
>
>I use the LISTSERV web site. On the left there are two apostrophes (quote
>marks). Those will i
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Matthew Stitt
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 10:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WLM Couple dataset?
I use the LISTSERV web site. On the left there are two apostrophes (quote
marks). Those will include the entire thread (so far
I use the LISTSERV web site. On the left there are two apostrophes (quote
marks). Those will include the entire thread (so far).
It is considered good practice to remove the IBM-MAIN stuff at the bottom.
Matthew
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 18:33:08 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at
Classification: Confidential
Horse hockey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLM Couple dataset?
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization
Classification: Confidential
D XCF,COUPLE,TYPE=WLM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 2:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLM Couple dataset?
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization
We re-INIT the CFRM, XCF, and LOGR at DR. The only one we reuse is WLM.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:41 PM Gabriel Tully wrote:
> Bill,
>
> IBM doesn't recommend mirroring the couple data sets [1]. There may not be
> serious ramifications for the WLM CDS, but it could be on the
Bill,
IBM doesn't recommend mirroring the couple data sets [1]. There may not be
serious ramifications for the WLM CDS, but it could be on the same volume with
a more critical Sysplex CDS or CFRM CDS. The last time I asked IBM about
mirroring CDSes a severe tone was employed to strongly
On the listserv web page, to the left of the top of the place where you type
your reply, there is a large double quote. Click on that.
--
Tom Marchant
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 18:33:08 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 18:27, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>
>> I am in the listserv web
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 18:27, Bill Giannelli wrote:
> I am in the listserv web page. I do not see 3 dots above the send button
>
Sorry - my advice was for Gmail only. I never use the listserv page to post
things, so can't help you. But surely you aren't the only one, so perhaps
someone will
I am in the listserv web page. I do not see 3 dots above the send button
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 18:14, Bill Giannelli wrote:
> I apologize, it is inadvertent.
> How do I include the whole thread?
>
In Gmail (which you seem to be using), after you click Reply, click the
three little dots icon that's just above the Send button at the bottom.
But please do trim your
I apologize, it is inadvertent.
How do I include the whole thread?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
] Re: WLM Couple dataset?
not that makes sense to me...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
not that makes sense to me...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Do they give a reason? Or explanation?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Bill Giannelli
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:52 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: WLM Couple dataset?
> >
> we are being told by
we are being told by our managed service vendor they have to manually update
the DR WLM Couple datasets. that they cant be mirrored..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
We use Global Mirror to keep our WLM dataset in sync to our DR system.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:49 PM Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> yes I understand that. but we had policy definitions in PROD that were not
> copied over to DR.
> We thought the WLM Couple dataset could be mirrored in our
yes I understand that. but we had policy definitions in PROD that were not
copied over to DR.
We thought the WLM Couple dataset could be mirrored in our DR.
We are being told they have to be manually kept in synch now.
thanks
Bill
ssage: INFO IBM-MAIN
Just an FYI, you do not need to know the couple dataset name for WLM to update
the WLM policy. You do it through the panels.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
thank you both!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:23:43 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=command-displaying-workload-manager-information-wlm
>
>D WLM
>
>On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:19 PM Bill Giannelli wrote:
>>
>> where can I find what the WLM Couple data
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=command-displaying-workload-manager-information-wlm
D WLM
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:19 PM Bill Giannelli wrote:
>
> where can I find what the WLM Couple dataset is?
> we need a policy updated and then the WLM Couple Dataset mirrored in our DR.
where can I find what the WLM Couple dataset is?
we need a policy updated and then the WLM Couple Dataset mirrored in our DR.
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
In a past life, I used the MXg REXXWLM to convert the old and new
policy definitions to SAS data bases and compared the two,
Another is to just print the old and new and Super-C the two.
Michael
At 05:50 AM 2/22/2023, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to compare two WLM Service
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/listing-wlm-couple-policy-definitions
Then use diff
Colin
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 11:51, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions?
>
> Tha
Hi,
Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions?
Thanks
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Bill,
Typically WLM appl. environments enter a stopped state due to a program error
in one of the programs running in that address space. Are you certain that the
specific WLM instances were in a normal state at the outset? It would be
unusual for one of the Db2-supplied routines to have
In my experience DB2 WLM environments are stopped because the associated
started task failed - Eg abend or JCL error. Check the output and syslog. I
also once forgot to copy the STC JCL from the proclib which I use for dB2
installation to a system proclib library so no STC output just a syslog
I am running the DB2 install job DSNTRVFY used to verify WLM Application
Environments. It seems it stop some of my Application Environments. How could I
find out why?
I am posting here after not getting any responses on DB2-L.
thanks for any help or direction.
Bill
"Great, I will use the "128" method."
Sorry, I meant, I will NOT use the "128" method and i will use my initial
thought :
"I thought that it was simply the amount of connect time in microseconds
divided by the total I/O count, but 3527936 / 19661 = 179.4382 that is far away
of 22968
Great, I will use the "128" method.
Thanks you all !
> Le 26 nov. 2022 à 18:47, Todd J. Gagle a écrit :
>
> Ed,
>
> Thanks for correcting my typo.
>
> Regarding the WLM information, the information that you mention is WLM
> related as it is a detailed
Ed,
Thanks for correcting my typo.
Regarding the WLM information, the information that you mention is WLM related
as it is a detailed display from the WMSYSSUM command.
As others have said, the values are displayed in seconds, but the source value
must be multiplied by 128 first to convert
On 11/26/2022 9:17 AM, Guillaume Boesel wrote:
Thank you Todd for your reply, but if I understand well, the following
WLM view of SYSVIEW uses WLM RCAA for the values of I/O count, connect
time, ... as I retrieve the same values using IWMRCOLL/RCAE but it
uses another control block
Thank you Todd for your reply, but if I understand well, the following
WLM view of SYSVIEW uses WLM RCAA for the values of I/O count, connect
time, ... as I retrieve the same values using IWMRCOLL/RCAE but it uses
another control block for the average values (didn't find EMCB in data
areas
Thank you Graham for the formulae, it seems magic :)
Le 26/11/2022 à 14:51, Graham Harris a écrit :
For each I/O metric, if you divide the value by the average, and multiply
by 128, then you roughly get the IOrate.
It is the same on our systems. always 128.
Whether it is intentional, or
The DASD service times calculated by SYSVIEW do not use the WLM control blocks.
SYSVIEW uses the data found in the EMCB control blocks.
The times and counts shown in SYSVIEW can be viewed in real-time over the last
hour in 1 minute intervals.
Within SYSVIEW, you can view this information using
For each I/O metric, if you divide the value by the average, and multiply
by 128, then you roughly get the IOrate.
It is the same on our systems. always 128.
Whether it is intentional, or there are some wrong sums being done
somewhere, i cant say.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 09:43, Boesel Guillaume
Thanks for your reply but my problem was not really about RCAA datas. My
question is how SYSVIEW can calculate that average connect time is 0.022968
second from the total of 3.527936 seconds of connect time.
You are right about RCAA 128 microseconds unit. I retrieved these informations
thanks
the metrics change over time.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 6:48 PM Boesel Guillaume
wrote:
> Hi,
> Is somebody know how to calculate the average dasd response time from WLM
> Period's connect/disconnect/wait/iosq times ?
>
> On my shop, we use SYSVIEW. In his option WLM, we can see
Hi,
Is somebody know how to calculate the average dasd response time from WLM
Period's connect/disconnect/wait/iosq times ?
On my shop, we use SYSVIEW. In his option WLM, we can see the I/O metrics but I
don't understand how is calculated the average response time.
For the example, how
22, at 12:34, Keith Gooding
>> <034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>>
>> This is a ‘newbie’ question (from someone who has forgotten a lot about
>> z/OS).
>>
>> On a development system our WLM service definition does not get much
>> a
om someone who has forgotten a lot about
> z/OS).
>
> On a development system our WLM service definition does not get much
> attention. I wanted to make a simple change to classification rules and also
> to a service class definition. I used z/OSMF but I think I would have the
This is a ‘newbie’ question (from someone who has forgotten a lot about z/OS).
On a development system our WLM service definition does not get much attention.
I wanted to make a simple change to classification rules and also to a service
class definition. I used z/OSMF but I think I would have
Hello
One of my colleague is looking for training on WLM/RMF. If there are any
retired mainframers who are willing to provide training or some level of
knowledge on these subjects.
Please contact me offlist.
Regards
Peter
space that was
a lower velocity had more memory, but the amount of memory use is a factor of
the memory that a space getmains, and WLM isn't really involved there.
Although, when it comes to something that has a tremendous amount of memory
allocated you don't want to cause thrashing by having
running time.
TASKA would be the type of work that is hard to manage with a goal, and
(if it is important) is a good candidate for SYSSTC.
WLM is as much about working out which workloads should have resources
taken away when the system is busy, as which are the most important.
Address spaces which
s determination is made by comparing the achieved velocity to the target
velocity
2 pieces of work with the same velocity may get wildly different perceived
performance.
When everything is free, WLM has very little to do. When things are
constrained, WLM will direct resources to the most
Hello,
I must confess that I am new to WLMs. I have inherited an environment where
the last update done in WLM was in the year 2001 and after that it was
never changed.
I have observed that the system address space is assigned with VELOCITY_80
and few ISV vendors applications are assigned
Alas no, but there's a number of products out there that will read said
records, including our own. ;) Pivotor does have a free tier, but it's not open
source.
Scott Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Scott, can you share a snip of code you have looking at delay samples from type
72 data?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Scott Chapman
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 7:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Querying WLM address space
SRM/WLM are already sampling the work running on the system. SMF 72 contains
delay samples. Including by report class. You can define up to 2047 report
classes so you can get a good bit of granularity. Maybe not down to a specific
batch job, but probably more than granular enough to understand
running this
service for every active ASID on the system (roughly 150 on our sandbox
system) every quarter second (our WLM interval) is not cheap.
Is there a better solution for collecting this data or am I missing
something about these WLM services?
Thank
This is usually very misunderstood. It's really the number of service class
PERIODS WITH velocity or response GOALS (i.e. with an importance level). The
reason is because WLM on each system will wake up every ten seconds (that's an
eternity in a z14!) to see if goals are being missed. It starts
We're in the software developmental business and one of our customers reported
a problem when 100 WLM service classes were defined and active. We needed to
reproduce their environment to test a fix. Once I read the advice "don't do
it", I used one of our stand-alone z/OS system
We normally put it this way:
Too many ACTIVE service class periods with too little work in each of them
makes it difficult for WLM to be helpful.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twi
:
> Mark,
>
> IBM recommends < 30 Service Classes. WLM has a limited amount of time to
> cycle through the WLM service classes, and if > 30 service classes, IBM says
> WLM can't complete it in time.
>
> Jerry
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From:
Mark,
IBM recommends < 30 Service Classes. WLM has a limited amount of time to cycle
through the WLM service classes, and if > 30 service classes, IBM says WLM
can't complete it in time.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacob
I seem to recall that there's a recommendation not to exceed a certain number
of defined WLM service classes for *reasons*. Is my recollection correct?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks
Gadi Ben-Avi
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 04/11/2020 10:15
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Using accounting information in WLM
classification rules
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thanks,
But at this stage, it's for regular jobs.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks,
But at this stage, it's for regular jobs.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Martin Packer
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 12:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Using accounting information in WLM classification rules
es (With Marna Walle):
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: Gadi Ben-Avi
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 04/11/2020 08:53
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Using accounting information in WLM
classification rules
Sent
Hi,
I was asked to investigate using accounting information in WLM classification
rules.
I saw that I can use AI as the type.
What does the value of name look like?
Are there any pitfalls I should be aware of?
We are running z/OS v2.4
Thanks
Gadi
WLM doesn't support fixed priorities, but you may be able to achieve your
underlying goal by the way you categorize your workload. I miss the fine
granularity, but WLM is what we have.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
No, but setting the SRVCLASS as CPU CRITICAL is very similar.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
ries (With Marna Walle):
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: Sam Golob
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 15/09/2020 15:56
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Can you set a FIXED dispatching priority using
WLM?
Dear Folks,
Question. Can you set a FIXED dispatching priority in WLM, like in
the old IPS, ICS, OPT days?
Thanks
All the best.
Sincerely, Sam
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Thank you, Massimo - that solved the problem.
'Resource Group' is something I've never used before - my WLM expertise
stopped developing about 15 years ago & ISTR the concept just didn't exist
back then.
Regards
Sean
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 09:22, Massimo Biancucci wrote:
> Sean,
>
&
Sean,
AFAIK WLM runs and manages continuously the workload setting DP as needed
(if there's no CPU contention ... so no problems).
Its main task is to make all the AS as fast as they can.
If there's available CPU for everybody every AS will take as much as it can.
If you want a single
Is there a way to force a maximum CPU% utilisation for a specific task?
Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but it is my understanding that WLM
only really starts 'doing it's stuff' when the system as a whole is heavily
loaded.
For example:
- If my system is running at 80%, and a new incoming
What Kees has written is correct. My rule of thumb is the faster the CP the
lower the velocity. With CPU upgrades I typically revise the velocity down.
It would help us if you would post a snapshot of the SUM report in RMF III,
then we have all the info and not just a tiny bit and we can help
for
other jobs.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pesce, Andy
Sent: 30 January 2020 15:24
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: WLM Guidance/Suggestions ! ! !
I have recently replace an IBM-2828 that had 5 GP's
Cheryl hasn't piped in for awhile. Widely published and referenced tuning
metrics and Goal Tender software available at www.watsonwalker.com
In a message dated 1/30/2020 10:36:33 PM Central Standard Time,
and...@blackhillsoftware.com writes:
>From my experience on systems with limited CPs
From my experience on systems with limited CPs (albeit some time ago):
- Velocities need to be reviewed. Achievable velocities might be much
lower than on a system with more CPs.
- It is critical that goals are achievable. The goal tells WLM when it
can take resources away from high
nnel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: "Pesce, Andy"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 30/01/2020 14:24
Subject: [EXTERNAL] WLM Guidance/Suggestions ! ! !
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I have recently replace an IBM-2
I have recently replace an IBM-2828 that had 5 GP's to a newer model machine
IBM-3907-ZR1 with only 2 GP's.
Does anyone know of a guide or paper or something that might have some things
to look at or modify when reducing the number of GP's.
I have 2 classes of service for my batch jobs.One
Have you try DGAXWLMX?
What do you want to do with the exit?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi,
Does anyone have WLM Exit code samples that they're willing to share?
The WLM Exit can be from Classic Federation Server or Connect Direct.
Thanks and regards,
David
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi,
I've been asked to design/code a WLM Exit for IBM InfoSphere Classic
Federation Server.
I have some questions regarding this and would be grateful for any
assistance.
Thanks and regards,
David
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
1 - 100 of 458 matches
Mail list logo
