In
f393f47ecbe9fc4aa71b2a242c0b689512f3880...@hfdpmsgcms01.aeth.aetna.com,
on 02/09/2011
at 09:46 AM, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com said:
The only problem with not limiting the region below is if you have a
job that does a variable length getmain to take all available storage
and then
We ignore it entirely by overriding via the IEFUSI exit. REGION is basically
useless in this day and age, especially for batch. For UNIX work, it may be
needed. And for some types of started tasks, such as DB2 (which we don't have),
it can still be very necessary.
--
John McKown
Systems
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:04:27 -0500, Haynes, Stan stan.hay...@cra-arc.gc.ca
wrote:
We run a 4-system production sysplex using z/OS/JES2 1.11 augmented by
Thruput Manager.
As a result of an application area reporting one of their critical jobs
abending S822 (issue since corrected), we found
What about region=0m??
From what I remember it will take what is needed, the down side is if you
have something run away(loop) you might be in trouble.
Mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
I worked at a place that had a similar setup with 8M. It was set
artificially low because there were a bunch of assembler programs in the
shop that did a variable getmains to give them everything below the line.
By setting it to 8M, it meant that they couldn't get everything below the
line and
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Larry Macioce
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
What about region=0m??
From what I remember it will take what is needed, the down side is if you
for the dataset control blocks.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Larry Macioce
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
What about region=0m??
From what I remember it will take
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Haynes, Stan
We run a 4-system production sysplex using z/OS/JES2 1.11 augmented by
Thruput Manager.
As a result of an application area reporting one of their critical
jobs abending S822 (issue since
corrected),
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Veilleux, Jon L veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
The only problem with not limiting the region below is if you have a job that
does a variable length getmain to take all available storage and then opens a
lot of datasets you can get errors due to not enough below
How was the S822 corrected?
We get this occasionally and just drain and restart the failing initiator...
Our JOBCLASS is set to 4M...
John Donnelly
National Semiconductor Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
408-721-5640
408-470-8364 Cell
cjp...@nsc.com
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:04:27 -0500, Haynes, Stan wrote:
As a result of an application area reporting one of their critical jobs
abending S822 (issue since corrected), we found ourselves noticing
a very old parm value: default REGION size for all classes via the
JOBCLASS statement. It's still
Is there any reason why you're not using the VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS
parameter in your DIAGxx member
Mark Jacobs
On 02/09/11 11:26, Donnelly, John P wrote:
How was the S822 corrected?
We get this occasionally and just drain and restart the failing initiator...
Our JOBCLASS is set to 4M...
John
, February 09, 2011 11:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
How was the S822 corrected?
We get this occasionally and just drain and restart the failing initiator...
Our JOBCLASS is set to 4M...
John Donnelly
National Semiconductor Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
, 2011 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
Is there any reason why you're not using the VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS
parameter in your DIAGxx member
Mark Jacobs
On 02/09/11 11:26, Donnelly, John P wrote:
How was the S822 corrected?
We get this occasionally and just drain
snip--
We run a 4-system production sysplex using z/OS/JES2 1.11 augmented by
Thruput Manager.
As a result of an application area reporting one of their critical jobs
abending S822 (issue since corrected), we found ourselves
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:28:36 -0500, Haynes, Stan stan.hay...@cra-arc.gc.ca
wrote:
The issue with how much *low* private to allow is ensuring RTM can
successfully GETMAIN, so I'm wondering: if we change the default to 128M, or
192M, etc, do we need to subtract some vstor for the low private ?
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:28:36 -0500, Haynes, Stan stan.hay...@cra-arc.gc.ca
wrote:
The issue with how much *low
@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:28:36 -0500, Haynes, Stan stan.hay...@cra-arc.gc.ca
wrote:
The issue with how much *low* private to allow is ensuring RTM can
09, 2011 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Default REGION Size
I think there is a product to do this kind of stuff. OESM or
something along
those lines. I did a quick web search and obviously I don't have
the right
name.
Rob
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Veilleux, Jon
19 matches
Mail list logo
