Thanks all for your valuable response
On Friday, May 18, 2018, Edward Gould wrote:
> > On May 17, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Brian France wrote:
> >
> > On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
> __snip--
>
> > excellent and
> On May 17, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Brian France wrote:
>
> On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
__snip--
> excellent and no one ever questioned me, after it was Hmmm…
> And just how many stubbed toes have they had?
On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>
in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
>> Edward,
>>
>> You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
>> is a slight overhead with EQUA
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>
>>> in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
>
> Edward,
>
> You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
> is a slight overhead with EQUALS option which increases the time needed for
>>in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
Edward,
You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
is a slight overhead with EQUALS option which increases the time needed for
comparison of records and for data transfer. DFSORT team provides
d
On 5/17/2018 1:19 AM, zos reader wrote:
Hello All,
We are planning to migrate Syncsort to IBM DFSort, May you share your
thoughts on it, some might have done this on their shops, please share your
experience
Thanks, Samat
Samat,
Be sure to do your due diligence and run performance tests com
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:20 AM, zos reader wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> We are planning to migrate Syncsort to IBM DFSort, May you share your
> thoughts on it, some might have done this on their shops, please share your
> experience
>
> Thanks, Samat
>
I have done this a few times over the years
