On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:55:09 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>This is kind of a hack, but you could spawn /bin/env with no arguments and
>redirect the output to an anonymous pipe and then read that into a buffer.
>The output with be a repeated stream of "KEY=VALUE\n"
>
But be careful. If a programmer
You would need to follow the CAA chain. For a standard LE task you would find
the anchor in the TCB. CICS would have it in its control blocks.
If you need it to be super clean, i.e., avoiding walking control blocks, you
could probably fake a call to your routine with NAB=NO and then use the
standa
>I think that there are two sets of "environment variables" in this
situation. There are the UNIX shell environment variables, which is what I
think you are asking about. And there are the Language Environment
environment variables.
I have not done an in-depth analysis on this but I don't
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:33:06 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>If you are a non-LE program that has been exec'd
Given that Frank's email is Colesoft, I suspect that his requirement
is not that of a normal program, but a debugger or a monitor.
--
Tom Marchant
-
There's an undocumented BPX function to get and set environment
variables. The "OpenMVS extension" to the TCB has a non-gupi pointer
that appears to be used. See SYS1.MACLIB(BPXZOTCB).
In article <5571771324344028.wa.frankcolesoft@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> Hi Don,
> Thanks for the info
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:25:11 -0500, John McKown wrote:
> >
> >... If you will look
> >at the UNIX exec() function, BPX1EXC, you will see that the invoker _must_
> >set up the en
mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Thomas David Rivers
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: USS assembler program and envars
Frank Chu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know if there is a
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:26:06 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:59:35 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
>>
>> Try:
>>LAA (PSA+0x4B8)->LCA->CAA->EDB->env var ptr array, ends with null ptr.
>>
>Since different processes spawned with _BPX_SHAREAS=YES may be executing
>concurrently in the
Frank Chu wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know if there is a control block chain that I can walk to
find all of the envars that are define? I know there is a LE C
function that can query for a specified envar but I can't use LE C.
And there are circumstances where I do not have access to the parm
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Frank wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Thanks for the info but that looks like it will only work with LE
> programs. The LCA and everything behind it are created when LE is first
> initialized. Unfortunately, I cannot use LE.
>
I think that there are two sets of "environm
Hi Don,
Thanks for the info but that looks like it will only work with LE programs.
The LCA and everything behind it are created when LE is first initialized.
Unfortunately, I cannot use LE.
Frank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscr
Thank Kirk.
The spawn and pipe was where I was heading down but I thought there must be a
better way to get what I need. That will probably end up being the method of
last resort.
I'll give the mvs-oe list a try.
Frank
---
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:59:35 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
>
> Try:
>LAA (PSA+0x4B8)->LCA->CAA->EDB->env var ptr array, ends with null ptr.
>
Since different processes spawned with _BPX_SHAREAS=YES may be executing
concurrently in the same address space, but with different environment
variables,
how
Frank,
Try:
LAA (PSA+0x4B8)->LCA->CAA->EDB->env var ptr array, ends with null ptr.
In article you wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anybody know if there is a control block chain that I can walk to
> find all of the envars that are define??? I know there is a LE C function
> that can query for a specified
Be sure to ask this on the mvs-oe list, since an IBM Unix guy might see it
there and give a better answer.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> Seems like a really good question... you would think that there would be a
> point
Seems like a really good question... you would think that there would be a
pointer somewhere.
This is kind of a hack, but you could spawn /bin/env with no arguments and
redirect the output to an anonymous pipe and then read that into a buffer.
The output with be a repeated stream of "KEY=VALUE\n"
16 matches
Mail list logo
