Claus said:
http://www.déjà.fr/
http://www.deja.fr/
This is really not new at all. Today, we do already have domains that
are very similar: foobar.com vs. foo-bar.com vs. foobarr.com vs. ...
foobar.com vs. foobár.com is not much different.
Claus
Dan K says:
1) your right. with your tld .de
John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, 06 December, 2000 10:22 -0500 Dan Kolis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan K says:
1) your right. with your tld .de I assume for the moment you
also speak German. The difference is what you 'try' when a url
doesn't work. If you tried:
from a purely mechanical point of view, if the character encoding
of these two strings makes them distinct, one might have to treat
them as distinct registrations - unless a very mechanical means of
converting them both into some canonical form were available to
make them "match" - one would
Hi,
There is also an interesting legal problem lurking with
http://www.deja.fr/ and http://www.bq--aduwvya.fr/
A court might find me guilty of trademark violation of "deja" with the
first URL, but I can't see them upholding the same for "bq--aduwvya"
Steve Dyer
At 03:37 05/12/2000 -0500,
.
Dassa
|-Original Message-
|From: Stephen Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:14 PM
|To: vint cerf; Richard Shockey; Dan Kolis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: Example of dns (non) fun
|
|
|Hi,
|
|There is also an interesting legal problem lurking with
|http
In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve
and the second does:
http://www.déjà.fr/
http://www.deja.fr/
In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer
point of view. Verisigns view would be each is completely unique. ICANN's
dispute
I suggest you look in on the IDN working group, review their
documents if you have not done so, and then take this
discussion up on theiir mailing list if you aren't satisfied
with the answers you get.
john
---
--On Monday, December 04, 2000 5:00 PM -0500 Dan Kolis
[EMAIL
actually your urls could be:
http://www.bq--aduwvya.fr/
http://www.deja.fr/
a application may render the bq--aduwvya.fr as déjà.fr or it may not.
Finally it would be up to the URDP process or the courts as to *if* the
two domains are the same. We shouldn't worry what the URDP or
At 05:00 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Dan Kolis wrote:
In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve
and the second does:
http://www.déjà.fr/
http://www.deja.fr/
In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer
point of view.
Depends on who is the
