Just thinking out aloud
What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use
them...) right under the mic, so that it takes a picture of the badge
and shows it on the screen? Everyone (right?) in a meeting has a
badge wit his/her/its :) name and affiliation, so privacy concerns
On 08/07/2013 02:26 AM, Riccardo Bernardini wrote:
Just thinking out aloud
What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use
them...) right under the mic, so that it takes a picture of the badge
and shows it on the screen? Everyone (right?) in a meeting has a
badge wit
A couple of procedural points here:
The issue here is whether this proposal should be an IETF Proposed STANDARD.
...
Usually when the IETF publishes an algorithm it is given INFORMATIONAL or
EXPERIMENTAL status. That is what originally happened with JSON, RFC 4627
has INFORMATIONAL status
On Aug 6, 2013, at 21:45, Joe Hildebrand hil...@cursive.net wrote:
On 8/6/13 1:11 PM, Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org wrote:
If a CBOR application does require initial signature bytes for
self-description purposes, I would suggest using something like
0xd8 0xf8 ...data item...
which
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote:
Using the individual submissions track as a way to circumvent working
group
process when there is an actual IETF JSON working group seems completely
wrong to me.
No one is circumventing anything. The JSON working
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Martin Rex m...@sap.com wrote:
Maybe attaching such a sign to the MIC from the start could
additionally improve the situation.
There were signs like this attached to all the mics in all the rooms at this
IETF. I never looked at them, and I doubt anybody else did
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
What I've seen in other groups that has worked is a volunteer to record the
names of speakers *before* they get to the mic, and then each speaker is
announced. Of course that's one more volunteer to find, but it's pretty light
Ted Lemon wrote:
Ironically, this IETF everyone who stayed at the Intercontinental was
walking around with an RFID key in their pocket the whole meeting.
Could there be a conflict if IETF badges also have RFID tags attached,
eg we get Room 1283 at the mic?
P.
Joe Abley wrote:
Or perhaps future IETFers.app releases could talk using bluetooth to a
transponder duct-taped to the mic stand and realise the same outcomes
(and if you don't like that, you can always touch no in the
appropriate place on your phone).
Instead of requiring additional hardware
On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Douglas Otis doug.mtv...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. One minor downside was needing an additional flight. It seems AB
who handles about a third of the traffic rather than Lufthansa that handles
about one fifth, was not the best choice where a 6 hour layover extended
From: Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com
I would personally love it if IETF did another Munich meeting, because
I haven't been there since I was seven, and I've always wanted to go back
Many fine lunches and dinners. Some things never change...
Noel
Dare I ask how many IETFers also kept their cell phones in faraday cages for
the duration of the conference?
On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Riccardo Bernardini framefri...@gmail.com wrote:
Just thinking out aloud
What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use
them...) right under the mic, so that it takes a picture of the badge
and shows it on the screen? Everyone (right?) in a
My wallet supposedly has a RFID-blocking layer, but I've not actually
tested it. I think the only RFID-capable thing in my wallet is my US
passport.
I used my cell phone in Berlin extensively, both roaming and on wifi,
obviously, so both radios were active for most of the time I was there.
would this mandate wearing badges only in certain locations, e.g. over the left
breast?
/bill
On 6August2013Tuesday, at 23:26, Riccardo Bernardini wrote:
Just thinking out aloud
What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use
them...) right under the mic, so that it
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Chris Elliott chell...@pobox.com wrote:
My wallet supposedly has a RFID-blocking layer, but I've not actually tested
it. I think the only RFID-capable thing in my wallet is my US passport.
Take a look at what's in your passport with an NFC tool. For example,
On Aug 7, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I keep my passport in a cage when I'm not handing it to someone.
I'm not concerned about my phone.
Likewise. The point being, handing everyone in IETF an RFID tag probably
doesn't have new privacy implications for most of
On 2013-08-07, at 13:28, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote:
[...] I don't think you can argue that carrying an RFID tag with a simple
number in it makes things any worse.
That sounds right.
The purpose of the badge is to dilute your personal privacy and announce your
identity to those
On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 13:43:06 Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-08-07, at 13:28, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote:
[...] I don't think you can argue that carrying an RFID tag with a simple
number in it makes things any worse.
That sounds right.
The purpose of the badge is to dilute
I hope the RFID badges transmit (optional) pictures as well, so when I
harvest them I can use them to associate names with faces.
Agreed!
Berlin - Vancouver - Prague my three favourites.
cheers!
~Carlos
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote:
Venue was great, food options here and in the city were great, all-around
great experience. Let's come again!
(I do kinda wonder how there wasn't a
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 5:11 PM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
At last week's very successful Berlin meeting, the finances were
thrown of whack by the late discovery that the IETF had to pay 19%
German VAT on the registration fee. At the IAOC session they said
that about half of
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Chris Elliott chell...@pobox.com wrote:
My wallet supposedly has a RFID-blocking layer, but I've not actually tested
it. I think the only RFID-capable thing in my wallet is my US passport.
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
Actually, the main argument I'd make against IETF RFID tags is that
it's more plastic to throw out.
Unless we adopt the WIDE practice where the tag is re-used from
meeting to meeting. It's an elegant solution, and not that different
from the reason I
On Aug 4, 2013, at 22:11, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
At last week's very successful Berlin meeting, the finances were
thrown of whack by the late discovery that the IETF had to pay 19%
German VAT on the registration fee. At the IAOC session they said
that about half of that is likely
On Aug 7, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com wrote:
Unless we adopt the WIDE practice where the tag is re-used from
meeting to meeting. It's an elegant solution, and not that different
from the reason I own a complete set of Suica, Pasmo, ICOCA, PASPY
and London Oyster cards.
That
Unless we adopt the WIDE practice where the tag is re-used from
meeting to meeting. It's an elegant solution, and not that different
from the reason I own a complete set of Suica, Pasmo, ICOCA, PASPY and
London Oyster cards.
That is where I was going with that remark, yes. :)
Why
As far as I know, the simple metallically-coated anti-static plastic bag that's
provided with EZPass (and similar electronic toll systems) is quite effective
and very cheap. Aluminum foil will also do in a pinch.
On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com wrote:
On
What we tried for our experiment was simple: you turn in your RFID card at the
end of the meeting, and it is randomly re-used for the next one, i.e., a new
number is assigned each meeting. Unfortunately, we only got a relatively small
fraction of RFID badges back, if I recall correctly, as
On Aug 7, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org wrote:
On Aug 4, 2013, at 22:11, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
At last week's very successful Berlin meeting, the finances were
thrown of whack by the late discovery that the IETF had to pay 19%
German VAT on the registration
Why bother with RFID tags, or badges? Simply register with your cell
phone. We can then scan your Wi-Fi and Blue-Tooth signals when you
approach the mic.
You must not have seen my cell phone.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
I dropped the toothpaste,
As discussed on the SCIM mailing list and Berlin WG meeting, the SCIM WG
will be having a series of bi-weekly conference calls every other
Wednesday at 11AM Pacific time starting on August 21st. The goal of
these conference calls is to address remaining open issues and make
progress advancing
32 matches
Mail list logo
