infrastructure.)
Thank you for your patience with this matter.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
Standard Time (1800-2000 GMT). The total downtime is
estimated as being less than 15 minutes.
The IETF, and other related sites and services, will not be impacted by
this work; only the RFC-Editor site may be impacted.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (RFC-Editor
not be a
cause for alarm.
Thank you for your patience with this process.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (RFC Editor Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
they in the
future perform further repairs and notify me about them, in which case
those will of course be shared as well.)
Thank you all for your support during this incident!
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
--snip--
IP NOC reports splicing at the second location, Milwaukee, WI on the
96
as traffic shifts to the most optimal path
per design. These fiber cuts have been escalated to the highest
levels and all essential repair teams are engaged and focused on the
most expeditious means of repair.
--snip--
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF
as their engineers out there work to
repair this.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
Dear IETF Community -
I'm pleased to report the IMAP Mail Archive service is now back online
and available for use.
Thank you.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https
, and will be hoping for a quick resolution to this issue.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
,
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
unavailable during this time. Please plan
accordingly.
Thank you for your patience. As always, please let me know if there
are any questions.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https
supervise, or you can contact me
directly via email or Jabber at: g...@amsl.com , or Telegram or Wire
at @glenams .
Thank you for your patience as we work together to continue to improve
the IETF's online presence, infrastructure and services.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat
/idsignatures/ . Thank you for
your patience with this change.
We extend our heartfelt thanks to Digicert for their kind and very
appreciated donation to the IETF.
If there are any questions, please contact Russ Housley or Glen
Barney, and we will assist you.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS
and
finishes delivery of delayed messages.
Thank you,
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
to restore those as soon as we can.
In the meantime, the old servers are back up and running, and we will
investigate and determine a way forward as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF
...@ietf.org ) which I supervise, or you can contact me
directly via email or Jabber at: g...@amsl.com .
Thank you for your patience as we work together to continue to improve
the IETF's online presence, infrastructure and services.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
[1]
https
the testing I feel is needed, and then reschedule with all
those who will be involved in the upgrade.
Thank you for your patience as we deal with the details of this project.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce
for your patience as we work together to continue to improve
the IETF's online presence, infrastructure and services.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:47 AM Glen wrote:
> We are aware that the RFC Editor website is down.
> It appears to be a domain registration issue. We are working on it.
> Please do not file tickets about the outage: We are aware of it.
The problem indeed turned out to be an issue with t
All -
We are aware that the RFC Editor website is down.
It appears to be a domain registration issue. We are working on it.
Please do not file tickets about the outage: We are aware of it.
Thank you,
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (RFC-Editor Secretariat)
information as to why
this update broke things, and limited log files were inconclusive;
however, we will refer this back to Torchbox for followup.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
e
reverted the files without luck, and are now reverting the database.
We will continue to work on this until the site is back up. It may be
necessary to involve Torchbox in the recovery effort.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
uest. We understand that
this is an annoyance, but we want to ensure that nothing critical was lost.
We apologize for this inconvenience, and ask for your patience and
understanding with this issue as we all continue to work for a solution to
the challenges at hand.
Thank you,
Glen
--
Glen Barney
I
(for humans only!) and
we appear to be back to normal.
Thank you for your patience during this interruption.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
ds, please contact the list
administrator show on each list's info page, and they will assist you
as soon as they are able.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
TF servers forward to
the latest OS and platform technology. As always, if you have any
questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly.
Glen
--
Glen Barney, g...@amsl.com
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
ket number confirmation message within just a few
minutes.
And of course, if you have any problems sending to RT, or any problems
getting your requests resolved, you are welcome to reach out to me
directly, and I will follow up.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
starting
the upgrade process.
Thank you in advance for your patience during this process. As
always, if you have any questions, please let me know.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
By way of follow-up, we now observe that reverse IPV6 resolution is
back online for the IETF.
Thank you for your patience with this outage, and noisy announcement.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Glen <g...@amsl.com> wrote:
> Al
to mitigate this problem.
We apologize for the inconvenience, and will send an update as soon as
we hear back from Level3.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
of (currently) working Jabber servers helps you connect successfully
to the IETF meeting jabber rooms. I've never had so many jabber
accounts in my life.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
as they occur.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
and 13:00 Pacific time,
(1930-2100 GMT) did not get processed properly by Mailman.
If you sent a message to a list, and did not see it delivered, we ask
that you please resend that message at this time.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
the
interstitial page on the IETF website, everything is running as expected.
We will continue to reach out to Cloudflare to address these remaining
issues, and will get that check page deactivated as quickly as possible.
Thank you for your patience during that happily brief degradation.
Glen
Glen
service.
Other services and sites are not impacted, and one way or another we will
have service restored shortly. Thank you for your patience in this matter.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
the community, even as we here at AMS work to support you all!
Have a great night/day, and thanks again for your patience with this
incident.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
as soon as we are able.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for your
support and patience as we work to improve the IETF infrastructure.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
. Please be assured that we are
aware of the planned outage and will be watching it. Thank you for
your support as our colocation vendor performs this upgrade.
Thanks,
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
that the problem is resolved. A resend of the
message has just gone out without the erroneous spam tagging, to
ensure that everyone receives it correctly.
We apologize for the noise, and appreciate your patience with this matter.
Thank you,
Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
On 09/16/2013 08:03 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi Glen,
as I mentioned in another email, that question is just a reminder.
No, it's not. It is a roadblock. If it was just a reminder. I would
be free to ignore it, in the same way that I ignore a reminder from my
calendar about a meeting
This discussion highlights the importance of making sure that hardware vendors
understand the need for working clocks that can be easily bootstrapped. In
addition to NTP radio clock receivers are ubiquitous, tiny and ridiculously
cheap. It is unconscionable that any consumer electronics are
. If not, explain why.
We have no choice but to relay the question to the authors.
I see, just following orders.
Glen, if you believe that this question should not be part of the write-up, I
think that you should take the issue with the IESG.
I have, and am continuing to do so (see the CC list
On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full
conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 for this document have
already been filed. The confirmation
On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
Network Working Group A. Clark
Internet-Draft Telchemy
Intended status: Standards Track
On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full
conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 for this document have
already been filed. The confirmation
On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
Network Working Group A. Clark
Internet-Draft Telchemy
Intended status: Standards Track
On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full
conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 for this document have
already been filed. The confirmation
after many delays, if at all. Please note and keep
a copy of the correct addresses to use to reach us, shown above, if
you need to.
Thank you for your patience during this outage.
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the
Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that,
your mail is rather likely to get junked.
I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF
discussion
On 04/29/2013 07:53 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 AM, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
If we required the IETF to reflect the diversity of people who
are, e.g., IT network professionals, then the IETF would fall apart
for lack of ability.
[…]
If the
On 03/25/2013 09:23 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
I think I at least partly disagree. The acknowledgements section of
RFCs was not, and to the best of my knowledge is not, concerned with
capturing the history of where specific changes or ideas came from.
It ought to be concerned with giving
On 02/27/2013 03:46 PM, Stefan Winter wrote:
Hi,
[...] ferkakte [...]
As a German, I'm now torn apart between being flattered that we've
successfully exported a German word to the U.S. and being
speechlessly shocked by the way spelling was b0rked in the process.
I believe that it's
On 01/07/2013 05:31 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Michael Richardson wrote:
yeah, I know, but I gotta say to the IEEE SERIOUSLY?
Apparently the IEEE folks love it, have been there before.
It was very nice (I am one of those IEEE folks) if you had a nice
expense
On 01/05/2013 06:17 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Mark,
This location was dictated (if that's the right word) by a desire
to co-locate (back-to-back) with the IEEE.
So if you don't attend IEEE, quit your whining: at least you won't have
to eat he same hotel food for 2 weeks in a row...
...
On 01/05/2013 11:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
So if you don't attend IEEE, quit your whining: at least you won't
have to eat he same hotel food for 2 weeks in a row...
You don't have to eat there. Check out the reviews of this
restaurant across the street:
On 09/18/2012 06:53 AM, Black, David wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
comments you may receive.
On 09/26/2012 04:01 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Sep 26, 2012, at 10:55, Stephen Farrell
stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie wrote:
stuff that's utterly incompressible
In the header compression WG (ROHC), we had that a lot.
(SCNR.
Signal to Clutter plus Noise Ratio?
I'm not sure that this
On 09/25/2012 05:03 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-dime-erp-12 I am the assigned Gen-ART
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the
FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with
On 09/26/2012 03:29 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good questions all.
IMHO, Independent Stream at most. Or a simple blog post would do. :)
On 9/25/12 1:13 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi, I don't understand the process for this document.
I read
On 09/21/2012 10:44 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 9/21/12 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
-- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721
Why? There is a statement in the header, 10 lines above the abstract,
that says Obsoletes: 5721 (if approved).
It does.
Sorry. You said
On 09/22/2012 03:25 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
...
-- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721
Why? There is a statement in the header, 10 lines above the
abstract, that says Obsoletes: 5721 (if approved).
The IESG put this into the nits check before my time. The Last Call
By my count that would put about 5 months between IETF 94 and 95, and
just a bit more than 3 months separating 95 from 96. Leave it the way
it was.
On 09/12/2012 08:02 AM, kuor-hsin.ch...@us.elster.com wrote:
3 - 8 April 2016is good.
- Forwarded by Kuor-Hsin Chang/USE/Elster on
On 09/10/2012 06:04 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Sep 10, 2012, at 12:46, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
chris.dearl...@baesystems.com wrote:
If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job
with Outlook, that will be gratefully received.
I'm not an expert for this, but, as far
On 08/20/2012 09:29 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
We are paid well to design protocols because designing protocols that
work well in practice is a tricky art that is best practiced by experts
in the field.
But negotiating all the arrangements for a complex technical conference
is a
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 20:49 -0700, SM wrote:
...
At 19:06 11-08-2012, Glen Zorn wrote:
any one other than themselves. If support by IETF members at-large
is to be signified, then an online petition of some sort would be a
much better idea much less deceptive.
RFCs, for example RFC
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
Aihe: Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
Lähettäjä: Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com
...
(I'd even co-sign for the IRTF, but I think that isn't really appropriate
in this case.)
The for the IRTF underscores a
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 17:13 +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 16:41, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
consensus-oriented process
Sometimes, though, you have to act.
While a consensus-oriented process*) document could certainly be used to
improve (or deteriorate)
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:34 -0600, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
I also would vote to return to Minneapolis again and again even
permanently.
Geoff
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Richard Shockey rich...@shockey.us
wrote:
[RS ] +1 and no employer ever argued that
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod
HaSharon) wrote:
+1
Indeed, almost any place in Europe is easier cheaper for me (not to
mention less hassle from immigration and customs!) than any place in the
US.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 12:18 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 8/8/12 12:06 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Mileage varies.
For me it was the shortest and cheapest flight of any IETF meeting I have
attended.
If we discussed protocols the way we discuss venue sites, all would be
lost. Oh, this
I would personally prefer if the meeting was rescheduled for the week of
April 3 - 8.
Strongly opposed.
...
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:13 -0500, Mary Barnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org
wrote:
On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Instead, I think we should ensure that future venues have
adequate space
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 16:58 -0400, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: Murray S. Kucherawy [superu...@gmail.com]
I think it's impossible to determine with certainty whether someone
standing at the mic and asserting a position is doing so based on what
an employer is insisting on doing,
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:26 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
I agree with the comments about 2804.
I do note a lot of April 1 RFCs in the references
though, so maybe its all a joke.
Gotta be!
S
On 07/30/2012 06:51 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Yes, Scott, that is correct, sorry for
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:19 -0700, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Just a minor comment on this one:
On Jul 29, 2012, at 8:20 AM, SM wrote:
[the] working group at the IETF started with strong web presence. But as
the
work dragged on (and on) past its first year, those web folks left
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:37 +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
...
The IETF allows open participation and, as such, everyone, including
companies that develop enterprise software, are free to participate in the
discussions.
Do you think open participation is wrong?
Do you think that
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 13:28 -0700, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Do you think that corporate domination of open standards development is
OK?
The barrier for participation is low since there are no membership fees, etc.
For participation, yes, all that is needed is an email account; if
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 10:08 +0200, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
On 20/07/2012 18:06, IETF Administrative Director wrote:
The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed date change for IETF 95
scheduled for March 2016.
Currently IETF 95 is scheduled for 27 March to 1 April 2016. 27
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 01:30 +, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
As for the Ramadan issue: we've had IETF meetings during Jewish holidays a
few times, and folks dealt with it as best they can. If there are some
accommodations that can be made
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 13:25 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
On 21 July 2012 06:55, Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com wrote:
This year Ramadan started yesterday, and ends on August 19. Moving the
meeting one week in either direction would not have helped.
But moving it to the southern hemisphere
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 21:42 -0400, Ofer Inbar wrote:
Glen Zorn glenz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 13:25 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
On 21 July 2012 06:55, Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com wrote:
This year Ramadan started yesterday, and ends on August 19. Moving
Looks like this didn't get through the first time.
From: Glen Zorn glenz...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: glenz...@cmail.com
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt (The Tao of
IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to
Informational RFC
Date: Sat
E-mail: o...@cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
Skype: organdemo
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Glen Zorn wrote:
A quick check of the Upcoming IETF Meetings calendar
(http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html) shows that the next meeting
in Asia is scheduled for November 2015, while
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 16:09 -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
...
• The Tao mentions that we meet once a year in each region. I don't
think that's true for Asia at this point. The text might call out that we
meet where there are participants, or words that the IAOC might provide.
It
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 21:21 -0700, C. M. Heard wrote:
...
In Section 6.1:
Datagram de-duplication can be accomplished using hash-based
duplicate detection for cases where the ID field is absent.
Under what circumstances would the ID field be absent?
Replace
to:
ietf-act...@ietf.org
and a member of the secretariat staff will assist you.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
On 05/01/2012 02:52 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Here is an article that does a far better job of explaining the
situation than I did:
http://www.todaysengineer.org/2011/May/women-in-engineering.asp
The largest reason women leave engineering is due to the work
environment and perceived lack of
On 1/13/2012 1:14 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Thanks, Glen! Can we see (at least) a couple of more hands from people
willing to participate in the editing of this document?
Personally, I think that one editor is enough ;-). I think that we
could use some people providing technical
On 1/12/2012 7:15 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Hi,
If a number of hands were raised now and the folks commanding them say
'we are ready to work on this NOW' I would support including explicit
wording in the charter.
Consider my hand raised.
If this does not happen until the telechat
Indeed. In fact there is a conversation currently on the pppext WG list in
which certain people are claiming that PPP (?!) is obsolete, demonstrating
that even subject-matter experts are often clueless about what's happening in
the real world...
Sent from Samsung tablet
Keith Moore
the interruption will take approximately 20 minutes. There is no need to
panic, I will be handling the failback personally, and will have service
restored as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
Ietf
for your patience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
the interruption will take approximately 20 minutes. There is no need to
panic, I will be handling the failback personally, and will have service
restored as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF
for your patience.
Glen
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
On 8/28/2011 12:25 PM, Adam Novak wrote:
On Aug 28, 2011 12:06 AM, Glen Zorn glenz...@gmail.com
mailto:glenz...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to hear. Getting rid of cookies can save a _lot_ of money since
you're at IETF to work I'm sure you wouldn't mind if the conditions
more closely
On 8/27/2011 4:12 PM, t.petch wrote:
Glen
Me again.
Just after I posted my last message, I received a post on the ietf-ssh list,
hosted by netbsd.org, and looking through the 'Received: from' headers, as one
does on a wet Saturday morning of a Bank Holiday weekend, there was TLS, used
On 8/27/2011 10:30 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
On 8/27/2011 7:48 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
What I have heard is that the community would prefer going to locations
that were easy to travel to over interesting.
How do
On 8/26/2011 11:14 PM, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
+1. If you want signatures, do them properly. Don't pretend a transfer
protection mechanism covering exactly one hop provides real object security,
because it doesn't.
I could have sworn that TLS was an e2e mechanism. Maybe you're
On 8/27/2011 4:08 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
...
As long as they know
they're on the same subnet (and ARP broadcasts will reach everyone)
they should just ARP for each other and not involve the router at all.
If they are on different IP subnets, but the same Ethernet,
Yes, this is more often
On 8/25/2011 3:52 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Including only the hotel costs may (I haven't crunched the numbers) be
providing a very distorted view of the situation. In order to get the
whole picture you have to include the meeting fees and air fare, at
minimum.
As I believe has been mentioned,
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
