Re: Universal Network Language

2000-05-23 Thread Jon Knight
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Jean-Paul Jeral wrote: > (1) > http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/publications/gm/breaking/bre/brk-02.htm > states that: > > `UNL represents sentences in the form of > logical expressions, without ambiguity. > These expressions are not for humans to > read, but for computers.' S

Re: Universal Network Language

2000-05-23 Thread Jean-Paul Jeral
Hi, Fred Baker wrote: > > At 11:01 PM 4/20/00 +0200, Anders Feder wrote: > >The translation system being developed for the United Nations, the Universal > >Network Language (UNL), looks quite promising. Does the IETF have any plans > >regarding this system? > >

RE: Universal Network Language

2000-04-24 Thread Lillian Komlossy
: Universal Network Language Lillian Komlossy wrote: > It would make sense if it sat in front of the applications such as the > browsers and did the translation - or the applications interfaced with it - > but either way it will be another monkie to slow down the entire process. I > don

Re: Universal Network Language

2000-04-24 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:08:40 EDT, John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > No, it turns out that what they mean by UNL is an artificial human language, a > common intermediary that any human text can be translated into; they postulate > translation servers that know how to translate between UNL a

Re: Universal Network Language

2000-04-24 Thread John Stracke
Scot Mc Pherson wrote: > Pardon my ignorance, but isn't this the function of IP? No, it turns out that what they mean by UNL is an artificial human language, a common intermediary that any human text can be translated into; they postulate translation servers that know how to translate between UN

RE: Universal Network Language

2000-04-24 Thread Scot Mc Pherson
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:54 AM To: Anders Feder Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Universal Network Language At 11:01 PM 4/20/00 +0200, Anders Feder wrote: >The translation system being developed for the United Nations, the Universal >Network Language (UNL), looks quit

Re: Universal Network Language

2000-04-21 Thread Fred Baker
At 11:01 PM 4/20/00 +0200, Anders Feder wrote: >The translation system being developed for the United Nations, the Universal >Network Language (UNL), looks quite promising. Does the IETF have any plans >regarding this system? not specifically. Care to make an argument that we should?

Universal Network Language

2000-04-20 Thread Anders Feder
Hi, The translation system being developed for the United Nations, the Universal Network Language (UNL), looks quite promising. Does the IETF have any plans regarding this system? UNL homepage: http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/ - Anders Feder