Hi Travis,
I have read the BK article about IMail 8.2x but
that only talks about adding the port, not about forcing auth on it. Or maybe
the article isn't written clearly enough.
It
Bonno,
To force authentication, set the value ForceAuthOnExtraPort =1 on the key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Hi,
Found that key when I took a look at that part of the registry. ;-) Funny
this isn't part of the HKLM\Software\Ipswitch\Imail key hive.
There is another KB article which states that all we need to do to transfer
to a backup mailserver is to have the (identical) software, the mailboxes
I signed up also, but I think it was where you could signup and they would
select a few people to participate. I am guessing since we were not
contacted, we are not invited. I am sure they are trying to hit a certain
group of people and we might be invited in the future.
Thanks,
Grant
Hi,
I've a virtual host with external database (running on mysql) that have 3000
users.
My problem is that I have to monitoring the status of accounts with my
account settings with Host Administrator. The problem is
that with external domain, the value last login there isn't appear.
The same
Hello:
iMail 8.22
Ipswitch stated to our other email admin that iMail 8.22 supports smtp auth
from a second server against a primary server. The Ipswitch rep stated it
did not require the use of an external user DB. All the documentation I
have found shows this feature requires the use of
We were actually playing around with the Cluster Service and found this
just as the first reply came in!
Thanks for all your help
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: February 14, 2006 5:30 PM
To: Don Might
Subject:
Humm,
On this kb doc IM-20050428-DM01, there is no mention to that. Of course
this doc applies to 8.20, uncertain if it works to newer versions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Kesler
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 8:40 AM
To:
Hi there:
I don't know if someone could help me with this
issue. We have the Declude Antivirus installed in one of our e-mail servers
(running Imail). We just want to know how can we disabled the storage of the
infected mails that Declude detects. At this time Declude is saving this mails
You should try the Declude.Virus mailing list
declude.virus@declude.com
- Original Message -
From:
Dino
Zolezzi
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:48
AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Declude
Question
Hi there:
I don't
1. Best to ask on the Declude List.
2. Best to review the Virus (now known
as EVA) manual.
3. Best to properly administer a server
so as drives do not become full.
4. From the publicly available manual: 6.6
Automatically deleting viruses
You can automatically
delete viruses
I confirmed that their ISP is blocking smtp traffic to
outside servers. anyone experienced w/Telus?
Elliott
From: Elliott Bujan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006
1:00 PMTo: 'Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com'Subject: RE:
[IMail Forum] SMTP error
I'm
Telus blocks outgoing port 25.
tito
Elliott Bujan wrote:
I confirmed that their ISP is blocking smtp traffic to outside servers.
anyone experienced w/Telus?
Elliott
*From:* Elliott Bujan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:00 PM
*To:*
There has been many concerns about Webmail performance in 2006.x. I've heard
about SMTP/QM performance improvements and the addition of some functionality
missing in 2006.x compared with 8.x, but I don't think I've seen anything
regarding whether webmail performance is being addressed
Thanks Tito,
They'll use their server for smtp instead of ours.
Thank you all for your insights
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tito Macapinlac
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re:
Please wait until Friday for an answer.
The expert users group will be participating in an on-line meeting tomorrow
to review 2006.03.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
We have a client that receives multi-part messages and the HTML is always
messed up. If we use an Exim server the messages come through okay. I have
messed with this for months even working with the senders developers but it
appears to be an Imail issue that we cannot discover.
Is there a way
What version of IMail are you running? 2006 handles HTML messages a lot
better than the pervious versions
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:41 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
We are running version 6.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:40 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Rule to
OK List;
We've all got some new competition as of today. Microsoft just opened the
doors to Microsoft Office Live, a web based product that gives our customers
a website and up to 50 e-mail accounts AT NO COST, during the beta period.
They also offer full collaboration of contacts, file sharing,
Sorry, forgot the link to the MS site in the last message.
OK List;
We've all got some new competition as of today. Microsoft just opened the
doors to Microsoft Office Live, a web based product that gives our customers
a website and up to 50 e-mail accounts AT NO COST, during the beta period.
Don't forget about Google's offering as well.
Bruce Barnes wrote:
OK List;
We've all got some new competition as of today. Microsoft just opened the
doors to Microsoft Office Live, a web based product that gives our customers
a website and up to 50 e-mail accounts AT NO COST, during
Yeah, forgot about Google, but Google requires GOOGLE.COM for all e-mail
addresses. MS now allows the use of any domain name!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 17:58
To:
nope, they're doing the same thing.
Bruce Barnes wrote:
Yeah, forgot about Google, but Google requires GOOGLE.COM for all e-mail
addresses. MS now allows the use of any domain name!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
hi Spaminator,
Yes we are demoing the IMail 2006.03 release tomorrow and plan to release in
February.
Yes, some of the performance changes apply to Web Messaging as well.
Bye for now,
kg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Spaminator
Sent:
We working on several fronts to speed up the web interface. Right now the
web client creates the XML files when you log in (the XML files contain the
data displayed in the message list). We've moved the processing of the XML
into to the mailbox so the XML will stay up to date whenever the
Hi Tripp,
This sounds very good!
Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 um 01:54 schrieben Sie:
We working on several fronts to speed up the web interface. Right now the
web client creates the XML files when you log in (the XML files contain the
data
Title: Message
Considering we see at least 1-2 false positive per 500
emails - and roughly 5%-7% of the 500 emails slip through with spam, the claim
is absolute FALSE AND DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING IN EVERY
WAY.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] queuemgr problems again
hi
all,
any
one that signed up will get instructions for tomorrow's demo - it should be
coming if not already.
we
havea pretty healthy audience signed upbut if you are still
interested, let me know.
bye
for now,
kg
-Original
29 matches
Mail list logo
