On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:44:42 -0400, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks like in my haste to make a release with the pop3d bugfix, it
didn't do enough testing. I'm seeing the same thing here,and I'm
working on it.
Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stable
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 17:56 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:44:42 -0400, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks like in my haste to make a release with the pop3d bugfix, it
didn't do enough testing. I'm seeing the same thing here,and I'm
working on it.
Is
Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stable release
(2.3.3 in this case) and just applying the bugfixes if HEAD is only
half finished?
2.3 is beta branch. You want stable you go for 2.2.
Beta is may be, but still
1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I
Robert Mueller wrote:
Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stable release
(2.3.3 in this case) and just applying the bugfixes if HEAD is only
half finished?
2.3 is beta branch. You want stable you go for 2.2.
Beta is may be, but still
1. There's no regression testing
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:43:46 -0400, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This hole mess is a result of me having my head up my ass. I usually do
pretty thorough testing of any code that I touch, and I *thought* that I
had done that with the CONDSTORE stuff. Its now obvious that I didn't
Patrick Radtke wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Robert Mueller wrote:
1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I did try and
start a cyrus regression test a while back (just a perl script to test
basic IMAP functionality) but there wasn't really interest in taking
it up. I
On May 25, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Robert Mueller wrote:1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I did try and start a cyrus regression test a while back (just a perl script to test basic IMAP functionality) but there wasn't really interest in taking it up. I still strongly believe that some
I agree that a test suite is something that we need. I'll add this to
our TODO list. As always, code contributions are always welcome.
See below and attached, a copy of what I sent april '04. It's not great, but
it's a start...
Rob
Hi Ken Rob
Given that there's currently no
Ken Murchison wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd
as postman
May 24 01:03:55
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 10:44:15 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
murch I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4. This is a
murch BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new
murch features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis,
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 10:44:15 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
murch I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4. This is a
murch BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new
murch features that have not been
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as
postman
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: verify_user(user.ume)
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman
May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]:
14 matches
Mail list logo
