Fedora Infrastructure Weekly meeting agenda (2020-01-16)

2020-01-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
## Preamble The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2020-01-16 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a document at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we will use it to have

Outage for 2020-01-15: Fedora Prod Environment

2020-01-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
#8506 Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified a day ago Open Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-15 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your

Outage for 2020-01-14: Fedora Build Environment

2020-01-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
8505 Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 2 minutes ago Open Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC

Outage for 2020-01-13: Fedora Infrastructure Staging Environment

2020-01-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
#8504 Planned Outage - Fedora Staging - 2020-01-13 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 4 hours ago Open There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-13 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Reinstalling pkgs01.stg.fedoraproject.org from scratch

2020-01-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
The pkgs01.stg system has been used for a lot of little projects in the past year which has made it diverge from production in multiple ways. Normally, we would regularly reinstall pkgs01.stg and then import source code from the production system. This would mean all work on pkgs01.stg would be

Re: Looking to deprecate service: boot.fedoraproject.org

2020-01-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 11:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:44:57AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > We are looking to turn off the boot.fedoraproject.org servers. These > > were a technology which worked about a decade ago but the upstream we >

Looking to deprecate service: boot.fedoraproject.org

2020-01-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
We are looking to turn off the boot.fedoraproject.org servers. These were a technology which worked about a decade ago but the upstream we are using is dead and the current version we have deployed has been 'broken' for a good many people for over 2 years due to TLS changes and such. A tracking

Re: Issue with Fedora GeoIP service

2019-12-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 11:41, Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 08:38 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > When installing Fedora 31 on a system, I noticed that anaconda defaulted > > to US/Pacific for the time zone, rather than the correct US/Central. > > I'm on a Google Fiber connection,

Meeting agenda for 2019-11-21

2019-11-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-11-21 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a document at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we will use it to have our agenda of

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 05:08, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > I think we've managed to create a bit of confusion here, so I thought > I'd clarify it. > > For cases where an individual requests wikiedit access only to edit the > wiki (as in the recent case of @abolgna[1]), will infra please

Re: Another patch that makes nagios send the messages with fedora-messaging

2019-11-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
will do so. On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 08:58, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks a lot for reviewing this. > > As I don't have write access afaik, could you merge that into the repo, > please ? > > Thanks, Karsten > > Am 11.11.19 um 20:37 schrieb Ste

Re: Another patch that makes nagios send the messages with fedora-messaging

2019-11-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Looks good to me as the nagios person On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 11:05, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > It helps when patches are attached ;-( > > > Am 09.11.19 um 01:43 schrieb Karsten Hopp: > > Hi all, > > Now that https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8940 got merged we can > > migrate nagios from

Re: Mirrorlist server bug report - behaviour change requested

2019-11-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 08:15, Adrian Reber wrote: > > I was contacted by someone working on openSUSE's Open Build System > (OBS). They are using download.fedoraproject.org and some layout change > concerning noarch breaks their workflow. The problem is, that the > redirect service of

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-11-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:04, wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 16:36 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > There are 233 people in the group > > Are you sure? > I can count 118. > Maybe it is due to some privacy setting? > I must have double

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-11-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 14:59, Álvaro Castillo wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:05 PM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 12:59, Álvaro Castillo >> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> &g

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-11-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
d that. > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:13 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> The account listed in previous emails is currently only a member of >> the base groups: Approved Groups: cla_done cla_fpca . Aliases are >> added only after you have been accepted into anothe

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-10-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
The account listed in previous emails is currently only a member of the base groups: Approved Groups: cla_done cla_fpca . Aliases are added only after you have been accepted into another group. On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 10:43, Chris Rainey wrote: > > OK. Thanks. Maybe temporarily out-of-service or

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

2019-10-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 10:19, Chris Rainey wrote: > > I just noticed that my FAS account has an automatic(?) @fedoraproject.org > email address. Is there an "Inbox" for this or is it just an alias to my > "Primary" account address for privacy, etc.? > It isn't automatic but is 'awarded' after

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > &g

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 .. now I found it. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > valid. > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > concerned. > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > membership requests, but

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ > ___ > infrastructure mailing list --

Re: FBR: Change IoT devel/ keys to f31

2019-10-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 to the change. On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 10:00, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:42 PM Patrick Uiterwijk > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Can I get +1s for the following patch? > > Appart from devel in the subject the patch is correct so +1 from me. > > P > > > Regards, > >

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 08:43, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 00:16:13 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello! > > > > As you can read here[0], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a new way > > to help people become part of the community. > > > > This workflow

Re: FBR: Update koji-sidetag-plugin on Koji hub

2019-10-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 and thank you On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 09:31, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > In order to fix issue 8322 [1] python2-koji-sidetag-plugin-hub needs > to be updated. This would be done with the following commands: > > $ koji move epel7-infra-stg epel7-infra koji-sidetag-plugin-0.1-2.el7.infra > >

Re: FBR: F31 Final is GO, bodhi config changes

2019-10-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 14:04, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 19:57, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Now that F31 is GO, I would like the make the necessary changes to >> bodhi configs. >> >> "vars/all/Frozen.yaml" 1L, 15C written >> [mohanboddu@batcave01

Re: Big Freeze Break Request: replicate db-koji01

2019-10-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 16:55, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > So, I got db-koji02 all setup and doing streaming replication from > > db-koji01. It has no trouble keeping up. > > > > The bad news is, it doesn't solve the backup problem. > > > > *

Re: [FBR] bastion: Add sysadmin-odcs to fas_client_groups

2019-10-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 07:01, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > --- > inventory/group_vars/bastion | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/bastion b/inventory/group_vars/bastion > index aeacc87e4..8e63d1a11 100644 > ---

Re: Freeze break request: backport Flatpak installation fixes

2019-10-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:45:18AM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > One of the main goals for Fedora 31 Silverblue was to have core > > applications that were removed a few releases ao from the Silverblue > > fixed image because they could be

Re: [FBR 1/1] Enable new mirrorlist server on proxy14

2019-10-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 11:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 09:13 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > Thanks for that recommendation. Can you point me to a place in > > ansible > > where you are using this? For this FBR I would rather not change it > > and > > go with the current

Re: Big Freeze Break Request: replicate db-koji01

2019-10-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 18:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings folks. > > As you may know, currently database backups on db-koji01 are causing > very heavy load, disrupting our users builds ( > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8292 ) > so, they are currently disabled. > > However,

Re: [FBR 0/1] Enable new mirrorlist server on proxy14

2019-10-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 10:22, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 10:50 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > This is a freeze break request to enable the new mirrorlist server on > > proxy14 as discussed on the mailing list. > > Would it be feasible to wait until the freeze is over, or is

Re: [Post Fact FBR] update repoSpanner's SSL cert for pagure01

2019-10-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:47:00AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This morning I found out that https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure was > > not > > available, it was throwing a 500 error on every

Re: Freeze break request: update comps for rename of 'dnf-yum' to 'yum'

2019-10-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 21:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to > > comps-f31.xml.in): > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/427 > > > > In F31 'dnf-yum' is

Re: Freeze Break Request: log queries on db-koji01 so we can track down lock issues.

2019-10-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 15:50, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > +1 for me > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:43 PM wrote: > > > > This of course also includes restarting the db server a few times. > > Outage should just be a few seconds however. > > ___ > >

Re: [PATCH] postgresql_server / db-koji01: Adjust a bunch more for performance.

2019-10-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 06:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 11. 10. 19 v 17:28 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > config and drop the vm back to 32gb memory, but it seems kind of crazy > > that more memory would cause more slowness. ;( > > Can this be caused by swappiness? More memory, the same

Re: New mirrorlist server implementation

2019-10-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 03:39, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 02:02:41PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:06:20AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 08:38:18AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 08:42:13AM +0200,

Re: Emergency FBR: Lower concurrency on postgres to help load

2019-10-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 12:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:52:20AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Currently the load on db-koji is 140+ and it is slow and > > non-responsive to users. I believe it is the below change which has > > affected thi

Re: FBR : update robosignatory

2019-10-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Patch looks good and you have a plan of action. +1 On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 09:41, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks, > > Last Monday, before the freeze, we updated Robosignatory in prod with a few > new features, some of which could not be tested in staging as thoroughly as > we wanted to.

Emergency FBR: Lower concurrency on postgres to help load

2019-10-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Currently the load on db-koji is 140+ and it is slow and non-responsive to users. I believe it is the below change which has affected this. I would like to lower down io to 32 to see if that affects things and tune further if needed. I am not doing this until Kevin or Patrick are around as it will

Re: [PATCH] postgresql_server / db-koji01: Adjust a bunch more for performance.

2019-10-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 12:02, wrote: > > From: Kevin Fenzi > > The current settings cause database dumps to drive the load way up > and make the entire application slow, so we need to adjust. > Using pgtune, these values might well be better. > > shared_buffers + effective_cache_size should =

Re: [PATCH] postgresql_server / db-koji01: Adjust a bunch more for performance.

2019-10-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 12:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:13:41PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > why is work_mem = 157286kB versus 16MB ? > > Thats what the pgtune generator gave me. ;) > > I don't think there's any reason it couldn't be 16MB

Re: [PATCH] postgresql_server / db-koji01: Adjust a bunch more for performance.

2019-10-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
why is work_mem = 157286kB versus 16MB ? On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 12:02, wrote: > > From: Kevin Fenzi > > The current settings cause database dumps to drive the load way up > and make the entire application slow, so we need to adjust. > Using pgtune, these values might well be better. > >

Re: FBR: subscribe fedora-messaging consumers to zmq.topic

2019-10-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Sounds good so we don't break on restart. On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks, > > The fedora-messaging consumers are currently subscribed to the amq.topic > exchange where they get all messages sent over AMQP. However, the bridges > that forward messages from

Re: New mirrorlist server implementation

2019-10-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 02:42, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > Fedora's complete MirrorManager setup is still running on Python2. The > code has been ported to Python3 probably over two years ago but we have > not switched yet. One of the reasons is that the backend is running on > RHEL7 which means we

Re: Starting to address backlog

2019-10-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > 8065 Move older koji builds to archive volumes xx > > > > > > This is already in progress and has been for some time. I'd love to talk > > > to others and explain how it's being done and get some documentation > > > written up on it

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-10-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 04:35, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 01. 10. 19 v 9:53 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > Warrantee generally doesn't cover moves but the DC shipping company > > should have insurance to cover breakages they cause as mistakes > > happen. > > It is hard to claim something if the

Re: Starting to address backlog

2019-09-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 16:22, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > A few weeks ago I went and tagged a bunch of old releng and > infrastructure tickets with the 'backlog' tag. Clement added some more > the other day. > > In our last meeting we did some simple voting on the list to determine >

Re: repospanner and our Ansible repo

2019-09-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 09:44, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 19:01 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Out of curiosity, do we know where the bottlenecks are in > > repoSpanner? > > In theory, the architecture of repoSpanner isn't supposed to be too > > different from gitaly, so I'm

Re: repospanner and our Ansible repo

2019-09-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 19:02, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:47 PM Randy Barlow > wrote: > > > > I don't expect it would be useful to perform this test with GitHub > > since I'd expect essentially the same results (bottlenecked on my home > > internet connection). > > Out of

Re: Freeze Break Request: update openssl on proxy servers

2019-09-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 13:57, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On 9/17/19 1:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'd like to apply: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d51641f152 > > > > to our proxy servers and restart httpd on them. > > > > This is to fix: > > > >

Changes to the weekly meetings

2019-09-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
At the last meeting, it was decided that the chair of the Fedora Infrastructure meeting would be rotated between Infrastructure chairs. These are currently: abompard bowlofeggs cverna mizdebsk mkonecny nirik pingou puiterwijk relrod smooge tflink If you would like to NOT be running a meeting,

Rotating on-call duties to all sysadmin-main

2019-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Currently the on-call duties are being cycled at the Infrastructure meeting but have been mostly rotating between 2-3 people over the last couple of months. It was brought up at the last infrastructure meeting to start rotating this through the people who are in sysadmin-main. The reasons for

Re: Meeting Agenda 2019-09-05

2019-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 03:21, Michal Konecny wrote: > > Unfortunately the hackmd.io document could be only edited by owner. > On IRC I saw that we should send e-mail regarding changes to > sysadmin-main group, > but I don't know what e-mail we should use. > Someone 'edited' my document earlier

Re: FBR: upgrading pagure

2019-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 06:26, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning, > > I've just cut a new pagure bugfix release: 5.7.9 the changelog can be found > at: > https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/changelog.html#id1 > It's basically four small bug fixes one of which we have already hotfixed, so >

Meeting Agenda 2019-09-05

2019-09-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
## Preamble The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-09-05 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a hackmd.io document at https://hackmd.io/@ssmoogen/HyqIIdlmS Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we will

Re: Freeze Break Request: newer rabbitmq for loopabull

2019-09-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 16:38, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The new pika version in infra tags (needed for fedora-messaging) also needs > a newer rabbitmq version. So, install the RHOSP13 one (like we do on the > fedora-messaging rabbitmq cluster) here on loopabull01 too. >

FBR: Update smtpd gateway cert

2019-09-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
[smooge@batcave01 ansible (master)]$ git diff diff --git a/roles/base/tasks/postfix.yml b/roles/base/tasks/postfix.yml index e6c93a9..ca08132 100644 --- a/roles/base/tasks/postfix.yml +++ b/roles/base/tasks/postfix.yml @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ - name: install /etc/pki/tls/certs/gateway.crt copy: -

Re: Freeze break request: h2 testing on rawhide

2019-08-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 14:27, Rick Elrod wrote: > > On 8/30/19 12:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Can I get some +1s for this plan? > > +1, easy to back out if it breaks. > +! also > Rick > ___ > infrastructure mailing list --

Re: [FBR] upgrade the koji fedora-messaging plugin in prod

2019-08-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 11:08, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 17:06, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> Good Morning, >> >> I would like to propose to upgrade the koji plugin for fedora-messaging so it >> integrates these changes:

Re: Freeze break Request: Add a cron job to delete dangling images from our OpenShift nodes

2019-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 with the same comments On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 13:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 8/29/19 10:44 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to apply the following patch to solve > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8147. > > > > We start to quite often have build

Re: Freeze Break Request: also sign aarch64/ppc64le f31 silverblue testing/updates

2019-08-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We need to apply this and restart robosignatory to get the currently in > progress Fedora 31 uppdates-testing push to ever finish. (it's waiting > for signatires here). > > +1s? > > kevin > -- > From f2935a8d91a8b0bfef5387fbe46263988727cebf

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure

2019-08-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
And yes.. I have the wrong place for communication. We need on an agreed on place for future ones. On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 11:01, wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-08-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC >At

Re: Sunset of infinote (Gobby) service

2019-08-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 03:58, Clement Verna wrote: > > On 8/1/19 3:34 AM, Clement Verna wrote: >> >> > Dear all, >> > >> > The Fedora Infrastructure is planning to retire the infinote [0] >> > service. This service allows text collaboration using the Gobby >> > client[1] and was mainly used by

Re: Access for dusty to sysadmin-main

2019-08-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 09:20, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > In fact perhaps we could start doing this now somewhat: block off say... > > wed into 2 hour blocks. Sign up people who have projects or pet > > bugs/issues they want to get solved for those blocks and work on them? > > > I think blocking

Planned Outage - Fedora Staging/Build Updates/Reboots 2019-08-20 20:00 UTC

2019-08-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
=== Planned Outage - Staging/Build - 2019-08-20 20:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2019-08-20 20:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-08-20

Planned Outage - PHX2-Production - 2019-08-21 20:00 UTC

2019-08-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
=== Planned Outage - PHX2-Production - 2019-08-21 20:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2019-08-21 20:00 UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-08-21

Re: Access for dusty to sysadmin-main

2019-08-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 16:40, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > I suspect this request might fall short, but I figure I'll start a dialog. > ... > > I'd like to help if possible, but I understand if my request isn't granted. > I have a counter idea which probably won't fly well either. My main thing I would

RHEL-7 reposync directories to remove ? Feedback requested

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
So we do a reposync of RHEL-7 trees every night. For the x86_64 we have been keeping track of a lot of repositories which may not make sense to keep. I have broken it into 3 types: We need to Keep, no idea, and nope. Please look over these and let me know where the others go as I am fixing the

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Adam Stackhouse

2019-08-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 14:28, Adam Stackhouse wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am looking to help the infrastructure team at fedora so hopefully you > will welcome me in and help me get stuck in. So I will begin with > introducing my self a bit: > > Hello Adam. We will be having our next meeting

Re: Infrastructure docs & apps.fp.o

2019-08-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 05:19, Timothée Floure wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote [1] to devel some time ago regarding the deprecation of the > apps.fp.o > index and plan to move its content to the main docs. Kevin mentionned that > it > could end up in the infrastructure docs and that the whole should be

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure

2019-07-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-07-25 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a gobby document at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next which can be edited for the agenda (see:

Re: Funnelling newcomers to Fedora Join: taking over newbie group membership

2019-07-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 17:34 Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > We've written a proposal here[1] to move to a more people-centric workflow > for newcomers. The idea is that instead of asking newcomers to dive in > to tasks as we do now, we'll make them get to know the people in the > community

Re: BYO Jenkins for Pagure CI?

2019-07-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 14:37, Justin W. Flory wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking into Pagure CI with Jenkins, but it wasn't clear if there > is a Fedora-provided Jenkins server or if someone needs to bring their > own Jenkins build infrastructure for Pagure CI. > > The Pagure CI is run out of

Proposed Meeting Agenda for 2019-07-11

2019-07-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
= Preamble = The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-07-11 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a gobby document at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next which can be edited for the

Re: pastebin plans

2019-06-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 03:36, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 11:15:24 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > While we are looking at this, we have not talked with and gotten > > agreement with the person who runs cpaste server. We would need to > > make s

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure

2019-06-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 11:01, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-06-06 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure

Rescheduled: Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-05-23 21:00 UTC

2019-05-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Due to multiple personnel conflicts today, we are rescheduling this to the 23rd. On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 08:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > There will be an outage starting at 2019-05-23 21:00 UTC , > which will last approximately 5 hours. > > To convert UTC to your local ti

Re: pastebin plans

2019-05-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 13:47, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:36 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > > > On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the >

CORRECTION: Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-05-22 21:00 UTC

2019-05-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
There will be an outage starting at 2019-05-22 21:00 UTC , which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-05-22 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: There have been a number of kernel

Re: Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC

2019-05-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
My apologies Will fix. On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 19:16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC , > which will last approximately 5 hours. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject

Planned Outage - Fedora Staging Services 2019-05-20 21:00 UTC

2019-05-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
There will be an outage starting at 2019-05-20 21:00 UTC , which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-05-20 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: There have been a number of kernel

Planned Outage - Fedora Proxies and Remote Servers Updates/Reboots - 2019-05-21 21:00 UTC

2019-05-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
There will be an outage starting at 2019-05-21 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-05-21 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: We have come to chew gum and reboot

Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC

2019-05-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC , which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-04-10 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: There have been a number of kernel

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure

2019-05-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:00, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-05-09 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 08:11, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral > wrote: >

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which > would > > > replace checks performed by

Re: FBR: update libtaskotron on production taskotron workers

2019-04-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 16:12, Tim Flink wrote: > It turns out that we've been getting rpmlintrc files from the cgit > interface over dist-git which went away earlier this week. As a > consequence, package-specific rpmlintrc files are not being used > anymore. > > The fix itself is simple: >

Re: FBR: update python-tag2distrepo on bodhi-backend02

2019-04-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Thanks for the bump. I missed that this had not been reviewed. Mizdebsk +1 On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 23:51, Dusty Mabe wrote: > bump - can we get some votes on this? I would vote but my vote doesn't > count :) > > On 4/16/19 5:10 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Problem: tag2distrepo fails to

FBR: Fix nrpe/nagios so that datanommer is easier to debug

2019-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
I am retitleing as I should have said what the patch was for and make sure it had agreed upon subject FBR for filtering On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 07:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > This patch reorders two sections of nrpe files for datanommer so a 1:1 > comparison of entries ca

Freeze Break

2019-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
This patch reorders two sections of nrpe files for datanommer so a 1:1 comparison of entries can be done. It probably needs other fixes also and may not be useful. Please review and let me know Problem 1 is that nrpe.cfg in one place is a template and the other it is not. They both need to be

Re: FBR : resultsdb fedora-messaging configuration

2019-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Running. On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 05:25, Clement Verna wrote: > Thanks, this is now pushed. > > Can someone run the groups/resultsdb.yml playbook ? > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:04, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 0

Re: FBR: monitor that resultsdb sends messages on the bus

2019-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Looks good. +! On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 03:52, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > We currently don't monitor that resultsdb sends messages on the bus. > This patch will make nagios trigger an alert if we don't see a message > in 2 days. > > +1s ? > > Thanks > Clément >

Re: FBR : resultsdb fedora-messaging configuration

2019-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 02:48, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently resultsdb in production is not configured properly to send > messages using fedora-messaging which in turns causes greenwave to not > send messages (greenwaves publishes messages when it receives new > results). > > The

Re: Heads-up: Deleting fas3_server role from ansible

2019-04-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 08:04, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 13:49, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 02:26, Clement Verna >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 17:30, Kevin Fenzi wrot

Re: Deprecating Autocloud

2019-04-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 06:09, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > Hi all, > > Autocloud[1] has been part of the early stages of the 2-week Atomic > release process. AFAIK, it was built as a quick solution until > taskotron was not ready. Autocloud has served us well but over the > last year, we haven't

Re: FBR: Fix the freezelist script

2019-04-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Have reviewed. +1 On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 14:15, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > I found out that the freezelist script did not work with ansible > 2.7.10. Once the script changed to use the new api, it complained > about 2 non valid yaml file (errorsyntax error: found character > '\t'

Meeting Agenda 2019-04-18

2019-04-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
= Preamble = The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-04-18 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a gobby document at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next which can be edited for the

Meeting for 2019-04-11 Agenda

2019-04-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
= Preamble = The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-04-11 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a gobby document at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next which can be edited for the

Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC

2019-04-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC , which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-04-10

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >