On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:16 PM Robert Varga wrote:
> On 29/04/2020 08:35, Anil Belur wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I do have a prototype here:
> > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/odlparent/+/88440
> >
> > Can somebody test it, please?
> >
> >
> > Hello Robert:
> >
> > Sorry, for the
On 29/04/2020 08:35, Anil Belur wrote:
>
> Okay, I do have a prototype here:
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/odlparent/+/88440
>
> Can somebody test it, please?
>
>
> Hello Robert:
>
> Sorry, for the delay on getting back on this. As mentioned on the IRC,
> I've tested the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:11 PM Robert Varga wrote:
> On 24/01/2020 08:16, Robert Varga wrote:
> > On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote:
> >> Greetings Robert:
> >
> > Hey Anil,
> >
> > sorry for the late reply.
> >
> >> Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I
> >>
On 24/01/2020 08:16, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote:
>> Greetings Robert:
>
> Hey Anil,
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
>> Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I
>> think another issue has been identified with 0% coverage, that is
On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote:
> Greetings Robert:
Hey Anil,
sorry for the late reply.
> Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I
> think another issue has been identified with 0% coverage, that is caused
> by an update on the Java analyzer.
Ah, good thing
At this point, what's still needed before we start merging these changes? I
can continue to address any concerns with this, but if there isn't anything
further, I'd like to start getting these changes reviewed and merged.
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/status:open+sonarcloud
On Mon, Dec 9,
On 09/12/2019 22:36, Eric Ball wrote:
> Ok, I've recreated the "ODL way" Java quality profile (59 of 60 rules;
> one was deprecated) in Sonarcloud, and set it as the default. Future
> runs should reflect only those rules that were chosen. I still think
> this should probably be updated, as it has
Ok, I've recreated the "ODL way" Java quality profile (59 of 60 rules; one
was deprecated) in Sonarcloud, and set it as the default. Future runs
should reflect only those rules that were chosen. I still think this should
probably be updated, as it has not changed in 5 years, but for now the
>
> Okay, so what is the process to gain access? We have the controller
> being analyzed and the number of utterly false positives is not funny
> and I have no way to close them down.
>
>
To gain access, you'll need to log into Sonarcloud.io using a Github
account. If your Github account is
On 06/11/2019 23:53, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> On 11/6/19 2:40 PM, Eric Ball wrote:
>> All: I'm going to abandon the previously-linked patch request, and
>> break it out into separate commits by project.
>>
>> Robert: I've updated the Sonarcloud user permissions to match
>> SonarQube, where all
To get this moving again, I've tested all of the Sonar jobs that are
currently passing for SonarQube on the prod Jenkins. There were a few
failures, but they appear to be related to something missing from the
sandbox (presumably credentials, though I'm not familiar enough with the
jobs to say for
On 13/11/2019 01:28, Anil Belur wrote:
> Hi Abhijit:
>
> Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a
> vote on this.
>
> 1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1) before each of these change can be
> merged on releng/builder.
>
Sure. Keeping the release mailing list in the loop as it requires action by
the projects/PTLs.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:28 PM Anil Belur
wrote:
> Hi Abhijit:
>
> Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a
> vote on this.
>
> 1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1)
On 11/7/19 8:40 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:53:51PM -0800, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
Yes y'all will lose the historical data, there isn't much we can do about
that in this case since there is no ability to import data from SonarQube
into SonarCloud.
Could the current
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:53:51PM -0800, Andrew Grimberg wrote:
> Yes y'all will lose the historical data, there isn't much we can do about
> that in this case since there is no ability to import data from SonarQube
> into SonarCloud.
Could the current history be *exported*? That way interested
On 11/6/19 2:40 PM, Eric Ball wrote:
All: I'm going to abandon the previously-linked patch request, and break
it out into separate commits by project.
Robert: I've updated the Sonarcloud user permissions to match SonarQube,
where all registered users can administer issues. As for the history
All: I'm going to abandon the previously-linked patch request, and break it
out into separate commits by project.
Robert: I've updated the Sonarcloud user permissions to match SonarQube,
where all registered users can administer issues. As for the history
import, it is not supported. We will have
On 06/11/2019 23:01, Eric Ball wrote:
>
> You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page
> here: https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/opendaylight/projects
> Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run and
> passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects
18 matches
Mail list logo
