Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi Joe, > -Original Message- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:52 PM > To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong > ; Brian E Carpenter > ; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > >

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Joe Touch
On 12/1/2016 8:20 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > ,,, >>> It is the same as the way the Redirect function works on physical links, >>> except >>> that the Redirect applies to an entire network prefix and not just a >>> singleton >>> address. This has already been published in RFC6706, and what we

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi Joe, > -Original Message- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:33 AM > To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong > ; Brian E Carpenter > ; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > > >

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Joe Touch
Hi, Fred, To wrap up: - Subnet Redirects appear to rely on AERO-specific mechanisms, so would not be of more general relevance to a bis doc IMO - multiple link addresses are already part of the Ethernet spec and already handled by most IP over Ethernet implementations (and TOS marking correlatio

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi Joe, > -Original Message- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:21 AM > To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong > ; Brian E Carpenter > ; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > > H

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Joe Touch
On 12/1/2016 10:35 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hi Joe, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] >> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:21 AM >> To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong >> ; Brian E Carpenter >> ; int-area@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thought

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi Joe, > -Original Message- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 11:08 AM > To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong > ; Brian E Carpenter > ; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > >

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Joe Touch
On 12/1/2016 11:27 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hi Joe, > >> ... >>> RFC6706 already specifies how these Redirects work and is agnostic to the >>> link type. AERO(bis) tells how they work on AERO links through use of the >>> IPv6 ND protocol on a specific link type. >> My point is that the IPv6 N

Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels

2016-12-01 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi Joe, > -Original Message- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 11:47 AM > To: Templin, Fred L ; Lucy yong > ; Brian E Carpenter > ; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > >