Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-11-16 Thread Volker Hilsheimer via Interest
Rejoice! Once https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/443474 has merged succesfully there’ll be a public API again that allows applications to extend the list of supported clipboard formats with Windows and mac/iOS specific converter implementations. Feedback very much welcome.

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-27 Thread Roland Hughes via Interest
On 10/27/22 03:09, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: Yo Roland, What makes you think that Qt 6 has no clipboard support? You obviously didn’t bother with opening the referenced JIRA ticket. What Bill pointed out as missing are the platform-specific classes that facilitate the integration of platform

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-27 Thread Alejandro Exojo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Volker Hilsheimer via Interest wrote: > What makes you think that Qt 6 has no clipboard support? You obviously didn’t > bother with opening the referenced JIRA ticket. > (...) > Indeed, what your clients do or don’t do would be a lot more interesting if > we

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-27 Thread Christoph Cullmann (cullmann.io) via Interest
On 2022-10-27 10:09, Volker Hilsheimer via Interest wrote: Yo Roland, On 26 Oct 2022, at 20:52, Roland Hughes via Interest wrote: On 20 Oct 2022, at 22:35, Scott Bloom wrote: I haven?t been following the 6.x progress very much. Only because it was clear 6.0 and 6.1 were not ready to

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-27 Thread Volker Hilsheimer via Interest
Yo Roland, > On 26 Oct 2022, at 20:52, Roland Hughes via Interest > wrote: >>> On 20 Oct 2022, at 22:35, Scott Bloom >>> wrote: >>> >>> I haven?t been following the 6.x progress very much. Only because it was >>> clear 6.0 and 6.1 were not ready to replace all the functionality of 5.x >>>

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-26 Thread Roland Hughes via Interest
On 20 Oct 2022, at 22:35, Scott Bloom wrote: I haven?t been following the 6.x progress very much. Only because it was clear 6.0 and 6.1 were not ready to replace all the functionality of 5.x However, with 6.4 it appears that all functionality that is going to be brought forward, has been

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-23 Thread Volker Hilsheimer via Interest
Thanks for pointing those out Bill, I did not have those helpers from the Qt 5 Extras on my radar. Will check where we are with those. Volker > On 21 Oct 2022, at 23:18, Bill Jones wrote: > > Hi Volker, > > Another missing module in Qt 6.x that is very important to desktop > applications

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-21 Thread Scott Bloom
@Bill Jones<mailto:jo...@synergy.com>, Thanks. That would have been a major issue for my group Scott From: Bill Jones Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 2:18 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Cc: Scott Bloom ; Volker Hilsheimer Subject: Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ?? Hi Volker, A

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-21 Thread Bill Jones
Hi Volker, Another missing module in Qt 6.x that is very important to desktop applications is clipboard support. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-93632 Without cross platform (at least MacOS and Windows) we will never be able to move from 5.15.x to Qt 6. This is an absolute necessity for

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-21 Thread Scott Bloom
Thanks for the reply! Ill let the team know -Original Message- From: Volker Hilsheimer Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 7:01 AM To: Scott Bloom Cc: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ?? > On 20 Oct 2022, at 22:35, Scott Bloom wrote: > >

Re: [Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-21 Thread Volker Hilsheimer via Interest
> On 20 Oct 2022, at 22:35, Scott Bloom wrote: > > I haven’t been following the 6.x progress very much. Only because it was > clear 6.0 and 6.1 were not ready to replace all the functionality of 5.x > > However, with 6.4 it appears that all functionality that is going to be > brought

[Interest] Is 6.x finally there ??

2022-10-20 Thread Scott Bloom
I haven't been following the 6.x progress very much. Only because it was clear 6.0 and 6.1 were not ready to replace all the functionality of 5.x However, with 6.4 it appears that all functionality that is going to be brought forward, has been completed. Is that true? Or is there sill chunks