Re: [PHP-DEV] @official_php credentials?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:47 AM Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Ben Ramsey wrote: > > > If you use TweetDeck, you can grant access to others, without needing > > to pass around the credentials. > > Yes, that is exactly how we are using it. I'm presuming the credentials were

Re: [PHP-DEV] Mailing list moderation

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Di, 2018-01-02 at 11:49 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote: >> li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been >> aggressively derailing > > He was blocked in 2012 already: > > https://externals.io/message/59395#59421 I hadn't

Re: [PHP-DEV] Outstanding php.net account requests

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: > On 5 December 2017 at 13:57, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > > Furthermore, while some have karma to approve VCS accounts, they may not >> have karma to grant karma – so approving the accounts without

Re: [PHP-DEV] Wake up

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Seva Lapsha seva.lap...@gmail.com wrote: PHP is a collective mind. Any dictatorship would mean a degradation for it. If you don't like how it's managed, there is an easy path: 1. Earn authority. 2. Propose a change. 3. Implement it. 4. Maintain it. Start

Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote: As per Derick’s idea, we can arrange a webinar for those interested in better understanding how it works. Note that this will not be a webinar for the faint of heart – opcode caches are complicated pieces of software;

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5 snapshot

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, http://snaps.php.net/ only have php 5.3 and 5.4 snapshot. I think it will be great to also have 5.5. David had sent me an email about that a couple of days ago, and I'd said that I would add the snaps the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Alternatives to mailing list?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz maciek.sokolew...@gmail.com wrote: NNTP works great! The only pain in the ass is that it's hellishly slow and very very often times out, making the reading of longer threads (like this one) take... ages... Perhaps it could be mirrored / load

Re: [PHP-DEV] who is running snaps?

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote: Hi! Does anybody know who is responsible the snaps.php.net machine? It seems to be serving 5.4 builds under then name of php-trunk and that confuses people. Not only we don't have trunk as such since the move to git,

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] zend_auto_global_disable_jit missing in PHP 5.4.5

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:30 PM, freeone3000 freeone3...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working with a third-party PHP extension that makes a call to zend_auto_global_disable_jit. However, in PHP5.4.5, there is no zend_auto_global_disable_jit available, nor is it in its traditional header. Commenting

Re: [PHP-DEV] Some Stats

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 18:13, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah one of the problems that really frustrates the hell out of me is that, after I've answered a question or responded to an objection, somebody new jumps in and raises the exact same issue.  When I tell them to read

[PHP-DEV] Re: Upcoming Outage: php.net

Just a reminder, see the below message. On Apr 13, 2012 3:43 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote: Greetings, all; This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, between the hours of 18:00 and 20:00 EDT (22:00 to 00:00 GMT), the one of the primary php.net servers will be undergoing a critical

[PHP-DEV] Re: Upcoming Outage: php.net

://bugs.php.net/. Thank you. On Apr 16, 2012 6:15 PM, Daniel Brown paras...@gmail.com wrote: Just a reminder, see the below message. On Apr 13, 2012 3:43 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote: Greetings, all; This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, between the hours of 18:00 and 20:00 EDT (22

[PHP-DEV] Upcoming Outage: php.net

Greetings, all; This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, between the hours of 18:00 and 20:00 EDT (22:00 to 00:00 GMT), the one of the primary php.net servers will be undergoing a critical preventative maintenance operation. In this two-hour maintenance window, we do expect a period of

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: cvs.php.net

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:04, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote: judging from the lack of interest I guess you are right. I will remove the cvs/cvsup subdomain from our zone file, and the cvsup.php file (any any other cvs(up).php.net reference from the codebase, and I cc'ed the systems@

Re: [PHP-DEV] Problems with master.php.net

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 21:28, Klaus Silveira klaussilve...@php.net wrote: I have noticed that master.php.net has been offline for a few days now, resulting in a failure to login at the PHP Wiki. Are you guys having this same issue? It had been going up and down, yes, and now it's

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Array has `trailing comma`, why not the same for function parameter list?

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:47, Nam Gi VU nam.gi...@gmail.com wrote: It is convenient to have a trailing comma when defining an array - so as easy to add/remove code to add/remove an entry to the array array(    'key00' = 'value00',    'key01' = 'value01',    'key02' = 'value02',    ... )

Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: spankmaster79

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 05:38, Sebastian Beyer sebastian.be...@spankomedia.ath.cx wrote: Translating the documentation Into...? If you're undecided, we could use more people on the Klingon translation team. -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/ -- PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] removing some cruft

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:05, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net wrote: expose_php = Off? I think what he and others mean is that they want the option to leave the logo, credits, et cetera, completely out of the build at compile time. -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager

Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: rlms

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 05:11, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote: Considering the hack of Hannes' credentials a while ago, can we trust that the above message is REALLY from Hannes? Hmm. Just spreading some fud in this world of calm. He was discussing the same thing in IRC

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] [security] PHP has DoS vuln with large decimal points

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 21:00, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: Here are the results after some further tests for the same platform: * max float value: 1.7976931348623E+308 * min float value:  9.8813129168249E-324   floatval('1.00e-323') weird ... PHP wil hang when

Re: [PHP-DEV] LXR

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:00, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: You have to wait unzil the TTL is over Jesus why is the TTL so hughe? lxr.php.net.  61221  IN  A  94.23.222.92 [ha...@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig A lxr.php.net @NS2.EASYDNS.COM lxr.php.net.            86400   IN      CNAME  

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] new foo()-bar()

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 14:36, Felipe Pena felipe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm here again to presents another proposal, which adds support for instantiating a class and calling its methods and accessing its properties on same command. Example: ?php class bar {  public $x = 'PHP'; }

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 16:56, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote: Can't say I feel strongly about it, but I have a feeling that unless we change our versioning scheme a slight bit, we'll be stuck in the 5.x realm for a very long time (and I do think it actually reflects badly on the way the

Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone?

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 20:47, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: hi, [snip] Please not I'm not requesting to do it now and here, only trying to get a feeling/poll about git usage. You might recall several conversations on this during the period where Gwynne was migrating us from CVS

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] Potential PC conflict.

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 06:47, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote: And probably all sane, rational people will agree with you (and me). It's the loonies I worry about! The person who submitted that is a mongoid. The term they were trying to be funny about is mongoloid, which is a

Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:50, Daniel Jänecke jaene...@gmx.li wrote: Well, isn't the problem here more people asking on IRC rather than using a search engine before? Renaming will not solve that. In this case, one might argue that it would. Instead of what's a T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM? you

Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:24, Scott MacVicar sc...@macvicar.net wrote: using a name like admin in your email headers isn't going to be very receptive. I was thinking the exact same thing. Glad not to be the only one. ;-P -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager

Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: cyko

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 21:12, Daniel Mcdonald c...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: Maintaining the PHP Documentation, as I have advanced PHP knowledge aswell as my native language is English (also know a few other EU languages which could help with translations etc.). I've contributed notes before to

Re: [PHP-DEV] dangerous handling of security bugs

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:12, Ferenc Kovacs i...@tyrael.hu wrote: btw: why can't we see the status changes in the Changes tab at the bugreports? it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as bogus then re-opened and fixed. You can check here to see the email

Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: jespino (Try 2)

2010/6/11 Jesús Espino jespi...@gmail.com: Hi, i ask a week ago for a SVN account for Pear projects, but nobody has reply me. It's the correct list, i have to ask in another one?? You asked on 3 June[1], last Thursday. Sometimes it takes several days or weeks (or months), so you would

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.12RC3 Testing

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:40, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On behalf of Ilia (so the subject typo won't hide the RC3 from testers): The second release candidate of 5.2.12 was just released for testing and can be downloaded here: Just semantics, but wouldn't this then be the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.3.0 Released!

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:25, Rodrigo Saboyarodrigo.sab...@bolsademulher.com wrote: But I think the changelog link is broken =P This will depend on your local mirror. While I've just been in touch with the mirror maintainers around the world, it may still take an hour or so before it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Throwing E_DEPRECATED on startup

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 16:30, Hannes Magnussonhannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote: Now that 5.3.0 is out, are you looking into fixing run-tests.php or all tests? Like I warned about; if you enable any of these features in your php.ini and then run the test suite.. there are only a handful of

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP compiling

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:42, Kenan R Sulayman kur...@kkooporation.de wrote: Hey Folks! I've got a error in compiling PHP ( 5.3+ ) (or executing the compiled PHP bin). It occurs with including php_xdebug.dll (alt. known as xDebug Server ). When executing the compiled binary of PHP. Any

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] POSIX 1003.1-2001 gethostname(2)

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 16:26, Brian A. Seklecki laval...@spiritual-machines.org wrote: All: Is anyone interested in adding POSIX 1003.1-2001 gethostname(2) support? I'm interested in sponsoring a small contract development initiative. I need something more reliable than $_ENV[]. Not all

Re: [PHP-DEV] keeping traffic on this list manageable

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the same as just making internals@ read-only. Once we have an internals-core, many core people will just unsubscribe from the internals list. I know I probably would. And once the core developers no longer read

Re: [PHP-DEV] keeping traffic on this list manageable

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hannes Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Read the whole thread before posting please: external patches and general discussions would still be on the internals@ list, as it would be the main discussion list. I have been reading the entire thread, Hannes.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2

On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/10/18 Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in both suggestions. Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read? Is that a problem?

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Chris Stockton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show us where people generally are coming from. There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now. Would it make sense to create an

Re: [PHP-DEV] Sanity tally #2

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was hoping to have at least 30 respondees at this stage, but actually have 29 (and that includes Hannes' abstention). However, to keep y'all up to date, here's where we're up to with Greg's proposals. Sorry for coming

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] [DOC] Commit messages dead?

Hannes, I think both Thiago and Elizabeth are correct. Call me old-hat: I prefer CVS but I'm well aware that it's a daunting task to learn that new technology for people who would otherwise not use it. In fact, most projects - including PHP - are moving away from CVS, in favor of

Re: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: [PATCH] Backport of HEADs output API]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I strongly disagree, for two reasons: 1. We are going to release an alpha3, that's the perfect time for such change 2. The OB code is messy right now, Mike's work cleaned it up and makes it more maintainable. 5.3 is going

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS to SVN Migration

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a windows user my observations/opinions are ... taken with a grain of salt. ;-P Isn't discussion about how to add on to SVN and which tools will be better-suited for development a decade from now

Re: [PHP-DEV] GSoC Bugtracker Midterm Update

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Barry Carlyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was suggested that students write about what they have done and what they aim to achieve by the end Can you name specifically three things you've learned during the first half of the summer that you didn't know

Re: [PHP-DEV] GSoC Bugtracker Midterm Update

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Barry Carlyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) working with object orientated properly, writing classes and the like, this is my first time using classes that I have written, 2) working with version control, git and cvs, I publish to my git local repo, and then push

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and all

Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net?

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in any case keep the CVS one around for browsing just in case... Is this

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] E_USER_DEPRECATED

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Lars Strojny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everbody, regarding my mail from yesterday, I've also created an RFC for the new error level. +1 Sorry, I thought I'd already given my

[PHP-DEV] Mail Server Configuration

Just a quick note to whomever did the mail server configuration: After a [enhancement pill name here] SPAM message from me (not really, but you know what I mean) hit the Internals list and bounced back, I saw the 550. 550: we're manly enough already Nice. That made my morning.

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.4.9

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm with Derick here. We should push out new releases when there are security issues As am I. The EOL announcement itself justifies the release: We will continue to make critical security fixes available on a

Re: [PHP-DEV] GSoC Bugtracker

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If not having the OS option means more windows bugs will be fixed as the core-devs won't know if it is *nix or windows, then don't ask for the OS. (He he). Please, Rich. Even Microsoft isn't capable of that! --

Re: [PHP-DEV] Curl POST emalloc leak?

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: start 326616 GET 327256 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 GET 327276 POST 327516 POST 327588 POST 327652 POST 327712 POST 327892 POST 328064 POST 328228

Re: [PHP-DEV] Welcome GSoC students!

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Google just announced the final assignments for their Summer of Code program for this year. On behalf of the PHP project I'd like to welcome our students and give you some general information about the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Welcome GSoC students!

Of interesting note: the list rejected my earlier (second) reply to your message, Johannes. It claimed the Google BlogSpot URL was a SPAMMY URL. -- /Daniel P. Brown Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4GHz w/2TB bandwidth/mo. starting at just $59.99/mo. with no contract! Dedicated servers, VPS, and

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: How PHP utilizes the Google SoC

Philip Olson wrote: As for where the mentor SoC money goes, I think it finds its way towards random PHP user groups. On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The money goes directly to the students. PHP as a project does not take any money.

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: How PHP utilizes the Google SoC

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Google Summer of Code sponsors students to work on Open Source projects over each summer. This RFC introduces guidelines and goals involving how we handle the SoC process. [snip=important info] Philip (or anyone

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP footprint and sharing code among SAPI binaries

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Eugene San [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I want to raise a discussion on subject that is very important for PHP usage on Embedded platforms. I am myself working on projects where we use PHP to manage embedded devices. Everything was fine but lately

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.Net Site

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Lokrain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello there, I am not sure here is the right place to mention this, but I still think it will be cool, if there is some spell checking before posting news on php.net. There are mistakes like the word 'Addded' - perhaps

Re: [PHP-DEV] Role model RFC

On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this proposal was made.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: На запрос: О семинаре

Bah. You're right. I glanced over it. Guess my Russian's not as good as I thought it was to miss a city name like that. On Feb 7, 2008 10:43 AM, Vesselin Kenashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: location: г. Москва in translation: city of Moscow 2008/2/7 Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: На запрос: О семинаре

If people want to SPAM about a seminar, why not at least mention where it's going to be held? :-\ 2008/2/7 Аленка [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Навыки эффективности. Умение управлять собой и временемДата проведения семинара: Одиннадцатое - двенадцатое февраля 2OO8 г. Продолжительность: 2 дня г.

Re: [PHP-DEV] get_magic_quotes_gpc, get-magic-quotes-runtime in head, get a final decision

On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. Personally +1 -- /Dan Daniel P. Brown Senior Unix Geek ? while(1) { $me = $mind--;

Re: [PHP-DEV] get_magic_quotes_gpc, get-magic-quotes-runtime in head, get a final decision

On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. Personally XX VOTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] get_magic_quotes_gpc, get-magic-quotes-runtime in head, get a final decision

On Feb 5, 2008 5:46 PM, Mike Willbanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps? Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people will continue

Re: [PHP-DEV] Array syntax []

On Jan 11, 2008 10:30 AM, Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1 Readability degrades quite a lot. +1 (b) Readability will only degrade as much as the coder allows it to. Besides, I don't get the impression that array() is going to disappear, only that another option is to be

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Square brackets shortcut

On Jan 10, 2008 9:39 AM, Sam Barrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:56 +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote: So you reject scalar type hinting because it isn't type casting and can therefor confuses newbies - but scattering seemingly random brackets around your code (to safe 5

Re: [PHP-DEV] U

On Jan 6, 2008 5:06 AM, Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Daniel, It may be off-topic for the initial post, but I disagree wholeheartedly with the above statement, Stefan. There are innumerable reasons where $_REQUEST would be much more economic than writing out all

Re: [PHP-DEV] U

On Jan 5, 2008 3:48 PM, Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, typing into PHP, even if it is optional. Passing $_REQUEST['age'] to a that $_REQUEST['age'] has been checked for numeric before the functio would you please not use $_REQUEST in any of your examples? $_REQUEST is one

Re: [PHP-DEV] Internals read-only

I would say, if anything, there are two viable choices that wouldn't adversely affect the PHP project: 1.) Have the Internals list read-only by all but (a) developers/contributors and (b) people granted permission after having posted useful information via the General list. 2.)

Re: [PHP-DEV] Internals read-only

On Dec 13, 2007 10:19 AM, Sean Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.) Probably a better idea, just click that DELETE button on any emails you don't feel like reading or responding to. I find that, in a case study performed by myself just now, it takes me about a half-second to achieve

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Requests Working?

On 20 November I finally sent a request for a PHP CVS account (danbrown), but still haven't received any acknowledgment. However, I realized that I was having problems with my email intermittently, with some messages not routing through properly. Does anyone here know how I could check on

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: danbrown

On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, Antony Dovgal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20.11.2007 21:57, Daniel P. Brown wrote: Assisting with maintenance of the php.net site, documentation, and bug fixes, as well as further developing the runtime and including bundled packages (perhaps such as the TTS

Re: [PHP-DEV] Thoughts on Feature Request - Arithmetic

On Dec 7, 2007 9:51 AM, Nathan Rixham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In-Built PHP Functions for parsing of basic arithmetic and if possible fraction to decimal and decimal to fraction PHP already handles half of what you're looking for by default. $arithmetic_string = 3*5; echo

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

On Dec 3, 2007 4:01 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Was hoping to send this off earlier but I was travelling for the past week and had very limited email access. As promised in the past few weeks we have spent a significant amount of time in reviewing the garbage

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

That looks great, Andi. Thanks. On Dec 3, 2007 4:38 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about that. Does the attached PDFed screenshot work for you? Andi -Original Message- From: Daniel Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 1:21 PM

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

Markus, If for some reason the PDF attachment didn't come through to you on the list, let me know and I'll upload it to one of my servers for you to download and use, as well. On Dec 3, 2007 4:40 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks great, Andi. Thanks

Re: [PHP-DEV] Garbage collector patch

On Dec 3, 2007 4:49 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: Sorry about that. Does the attached PDFed screenshot work for you? No, as you can't attach files here Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no |

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 30, 2007 10:13 AM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Dan Scott wrote: In that case, you should: 1) Have a legal entity that you can assign copyright to (PHP Group and PHP Documentation Group are not legal entities and therefore cannot hold copyright)

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 30, 2007 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] With PHP, the situation is different. The foundation of PHP was laid by Rasmus Lerdorf together with a large group of independent developers, and the central parts of PHP underly a different license and copyright regime from

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 29, 2007 6:03 AM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote: I do not care for IBM problems. Not at all. If people want to commit they can do it in their free time. If IBM now thinks they have to make PHP suitable for their own stuff then

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 29, 2007 12:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this thread popped up. It almost seems like the beginnings of a long-term hostile takeover plan, beginning quietly in the shadows. Come on... Really. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 29, 2007 1:09 PM, David Coallier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 12:49 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, what, exactly, is the fuss all about? Richard, the problem with a CLA (moral quibbles apart) is it prevents any of the core contributors doing anything with

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 29, 2007 5:56 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it is not more important. 99.9% of PHP users don't care what process we have, they care about how well PHP works for them. If we had best process in the world but no support for what people need - people won't use PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / avail loginfo

On Nov 28, 2007 5:49 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: On 28.11.2007, at 00:28, Pierre wrote: One word: transparency. It is amazing how it helps to discuss things instead of acting like that. I find it amazing how oblivious to community concerns

Re: [PHP-DEV] Quick question before submitting a feature request...

Ken, This same issue was referred to back in 2004 on the php.net site. I just looked it up and the post can be found by [EMAIL PROTECTED] from 9 September, 2004, on this page: http://us.php.net/errorfunc On Nov 23, 2007 12:32 AM, Ken Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHp Warning

On 10/24/07, John Mertic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, remove any lines in your php.ini that reference those files. John On 10/24/07, sivasakthi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, When ever i have executed the php files it throws the following warning message, PHP Warning: PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] My musings on problems I've had with the PHP community

On 10/15/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/48 Hope that article doesn't come across as too harsh, but I really feel like it needed to be said. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] VS 2005 Support for 5.3?

On 02/10/2007, Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, One important thing we forgot to discuss is to drop VS6 support fin 5.3 and finally move to VS2005. It has a couple of side effects but it is a one time job and should make our life easier on windows from 5.3 and up. Comments?

Re: [PHP-DEV] How to integrate PHP with my homegrown server

On 8/24/07, Steve Francisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip!] If the command line doesn't have a way to cause $_GET to be populated, then what other way of invoking PHP could I use? -- Steve Steve, You'd need to transpose the $_GET variables from the request to $argv variables via the

Re: [PHP-DEV] How to integrate PHP with my homegrown server

On 8/24/07, Steve Francisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip!] Thanks Daniel, I can certainly do that in Java without much trouble, however I was hoping to avoid needing to do things in each php file to convert argv into $_GET. I want to be able to serve standard PHP without modifying each one.