All,
In the last week or so, we've started to see a problem on newer PCs with
the Intel AMT/vPro (a kind of inline out-of-band management controller,
for those unfamiliar with it) which now supports IPv6... after a fashion.
The specific issues is that under certain as-yet unidentified
On 06/02/14 12:42, Sam Wilson wrote:
Note the v6 LL IP is a mutated form of EUI-64 (locally-assigned bit
toggled?)
Are you sure about that last? Surely the U/L bit should be flipped
Oops. Quite right, well spotted.
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
I fully support this idea. But I'm in doubt what to actually do on 6 June.
There isn't much benefit in turning off IPv4 on client devices in our
office, because we already have a good idea
On 06/02/2014 14:51, Dick Visser wrote:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
This is a terrible idea which will cause IPv6 to be associated with
gratuitous breakage.
Nick
I know there are different opinions on this.
But between black and white there are many shades of grey.
That's why I was asking.
I know that some stuff will break, I'm looking for ways to put this
'breakage' to positive use.
On 6 February 2014 16:48, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On
On 06/02/2014 16:04, Dick Visser wrote:
I know there are different opinions on this.
But between black and white there are many shades of grey.
That's why I was asking.
I know that some stuff will break, I'm looking for ways to put this
'breakage' to positive use.
people don't care about
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 15:48 +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 06/02/2014 14:51, Dick Visser wrote:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
This is a terrible idea which will cause IPv6 to be associated with
gratuitous breakage.
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 06/02/2014 16:04, Dick Visser wrote:
I know there are different opinions on this.
But between black and white there are many shades of grey.
That's why I was asking.
I know that some stuff will break, I'm looking for ways
If I understand the proposal correctly, the idea is that individuals will
disable IPv4 for a day, on their own personal equipment or workstations.
If so:
1. That *might* be useful, but it's unclear to me why having a day for this
is helpful; the purpose of IPv6 day #1 and #2 was to
Hi Dick,
At 06:51 06-02-2014, Dick Visser wrote:
I fully support this idea. But I'm in doubt what to actually do on 6 June.
Turning off IPv4 like that does not sound like a good idea to me. It
is possible to determine what would break if the network is IPv6
only. The idea would only make
On 2/6/14, 08:51 , Dick Visser wrote:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
I fully support this idea. But I'm in doubt what to actually do on 6 June.
There isn't much benefit in turning off IPv4 on client devices in our
On 2/6/14, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 06/02/14 16:04, Dick Visser wrote:
I know there are different opinions on this.
But between black and white there are many shades of grey.
Maybe. But this phrase:
If turning IPv4 off results in inability to perform our job for our
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:52:49PM +0100, Andrew ? Yourtchenko wrote:
On 2/6/14, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Maybe. But this phrase:
If turning IPv4 off results in inability to perform our job for our
employers, we tell them the reason and take a day off.
...does not
On 06/02/2014 17:52, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
Last time I checked, anyone with available days off can take them at
any time for any reason.
Most places aren't quite that generous; notice, simultaneous team member
leave and exceptional circumstance clauses typically apply.
But I take
On 07/02/2014 04:48, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 06/02/2014 14:51, Dick Visser wrote:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
This is a terrible idea which will cause IPv6 to be associated with
gratuitous breakage.
That was my
On 2/6/14, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
That's exactly the idea. It's explicitly *NOT* to break others'
networks nor to have the innocent users suffer.
Ok. But if you read the replies to the original email, it's clear a lot
of people didn't get that. So there is a messaging
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko
ayour...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe transforming this into a taking a day off and using this time
to educate the others and help them with their IPv6 deployment could
be a better option ?
Take a day off because you can't do work without IPv6
17 matches
Mail list logo
