Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-08-02 Thread Powell E. Way III W4OPW
--- Russ Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** And they usually don't even investigate without a complaint from a licensed broadcast station of some kind which is being interfered with. And sometimes even this does nothing. ER more than sometimes. The TIS on 530 just inside the NC

[IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-08-01 Thread Charles A Taylor
What I would like to know is, will the FCC start getting on the cases of owners that rebroadcast NOAA weather radio? Seems to me the FCC is everywhere and nowhere. If I weren't a law-abiding person, I'd set up a pirate station right now. FCC, humph. What a joke CATmudgeon Charles A Taylor,

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-08-01 Thread Patrick Martin
Charles, It may be that someone complained about QRM from a TIS/HAR and the message got from an NAB member to the FCC. The NAB is famous for lighting a fire under the FCC and getting them to act on things including pirates. As one FCC offical told me quite a few years back in Portland that they

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-08-01 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Patrick Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles, It may be that someone complained about QRM from a TIS/HAR and the message got from an NAB member to the FCC. The NAB is famous for lighting a fire under the FCC and getting them to act on things including pirates. As one FCC offical

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Bruce Portzer
Mike That could very well be the case. NOAA is a federal agency, so its stations would fall outside FCC jurisdiction. I know I've heard IDs from the one in Seattle, but I don't recall if I've heard any recently. Bruce Michael Hawkins wrote: Bruce, Are NOAA stations exempt from

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Patrick Martin
NOAA radio stations do ID. The one in Astoria is KEC91. Many of the HAR stations along the Oregon coast seem to run non-stop NOAA broadcasts. They do ID, but you hear the NOAA station ID more often. Is the FCC saying that the NOAA broadcasts are illegal, being run on TIS stations? If so, there are

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Michael Hawkins
I was curious because the owner of ABDX (another DX list for those who don't know already) asked me what WX stations I could hear from this location. The San Francisco area one on 162.4 was strong but did not ID (including TOH) and the Monterey one on 162.55 also did not ID. The 162.475

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread LAWRENCE STOLER
from the FCC. Larry Stoler - Original Message - From: Bruce Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America irca@hard-core-dx.com Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:05 AM Subject: Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS Mike That could very well

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
One of the BEST run TIS's Ive ever heard is WPII600, at 1570Khz in Glastonbury, Connecticut. The audio is not fed down or recorded on a phone line, it comes from a computer hard drive in a computer thats inside a small mini studio with a professional mixer and microphone They are only 10 Watts,

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Mike McKenna
All federal government stations are assigned call signs or ID's -- that are required to be used. Even the local FBI uses it's call signs. The FCC offices -- have call signs -- but use a Station ID in place of a call sign. Almost every NOAA station that I have heard --- at some time

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Mike, The Astoria TIS on 1650 is located up on a telephone pole with the whip going up from the tx box. It is off the ground far enough and right on the highway going into Astoria that stealing it would be very hard to do. Their ground system goes right into Youngs Bay so they get out very well.

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
Concentrating on this stuff as opposed to any problems with any substance is another absurd illustration of the political sacking of the FCC's more traditional activities. These are essentially victimless offenses, hurting nobody that they're wasting tax dollars on. Better they should

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Bruce Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike That could very well be the case. NOAA is a federal agency, so its stations would fall outside FCC jurisdiction. I know I've heard IDs from the one in Seattle, but I don't recall if I've heard any recently. Sounds more like a

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Mike McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I few stations have been moved -- after not meeting a needed coverage area. Most TIS stations have a very low priority as well as funding -- and once placed in the field --- they remain there until the General Services Div - radio service desides

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Patrick Martin
The VHF NOAA station here in Astoria IDs all of the time as NOAA Radio KEC91 in Astoria Oregon So when an AM tis/HAR relays them, you get the NOAA radio IDs much more often than the TIS ID. At least around here. If you can hear the TIS long enough, like a local one, they do ID too. NOAA just IDs

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Chuck Hutton
DX friend, Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Edmunds Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 7:22 AM To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS Concentrating on this stuff

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Like the old saying goes If you can't say something nice about someone, don't say anything at all. :) Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions

[IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-28 Thread Bruce Portzer
From Radio World News Bytes dated July 27. The FCC appears to be cracking down on abuse of Traveler's Information Stations, CGC Communicator reports. The newsletter notes that the FCC has given the state of California 20

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-28 Thread Patrick Griffith, N0NNK / WPE9HVW
They should check out Denver. The Colorado DOT super station (40 watts ERP) on 530 kHz lost it's landline control link during light rail construction activities and has been off the air for several months. In an agreement with the City County of Denver, CDOT has been running their endless loop ID

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-28 Thread Michael Hawkins
They have been running that same profound programming on KNEC996 which moves around various places in Stockton CA. I heard it for around two years when I was living in that area, and I never heard anything but the loop. I'm not there anymore, and I don't know if it is. Presumably it had a

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-28 Thread Bruce Portzer
I've heard similar stuff in Seattle and elsewhere around the northwest - TIS transmitters running nonstop NOAA weather, continuous loop IDs, and other things that don't fit the letter of the law. A few years ago, the one nearest my house was carrying audio from an Oregon FM station. I think

Re: [IRCA] FCC Goes After California TIS

2007-07-28 Thread Michael Hawkins
Bruce, Are NOAA stations exempt from ID's? I was listening to 162.4 and 162.55 MHz the other day. I know the 162.55 is local to me, but no idea on the other and no ID on either. Mike Hawkins Bruce Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've heard similar stuff in Seattle and elsewhere