[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219318#comment-13219318
]
stack commented on HBASE-5489:
--
+1
Add HTable accessor to get regions for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219333#comment-13219333
]
stack commented on HBASE-5492:
--
Once filled, how does the cache of table locations get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219349#comment-13219349
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
@Prakash
Presume we pass list from splitLogAfterStartup to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219354#comment-13219354
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
@Chunhui You have a new method splitLogIfOnline which will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219355#comment-13219355
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Mubarak After looking at FATE and whats involved, I think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219380#comment-13219380
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
Reviewing this patch again, could we not obtain this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219412#comment-13219412
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
After looking again too at the patch, it has too much custom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219421#comment-13219421
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
bq. Are we going to enhance Merge by allowing to discard data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219428#comment-13219428
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
@Prakash
bq. then the next step, that you outlined in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219511#comment-13219511
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
bq. Online merge requires table needs to be disabled but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219527#comment-13219527
]
stack commented on HBASE-5491:
--
@Honghua My suggestion would make your patch smaller.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219638#comment-13219638
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Lars
bq. This is not the same as merge, right?
Sounds like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219678#comment-13219678
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
Implementation-wise, this is a merge with the added option
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219794#comment-13219794
]
stack commented on HBASE-5491:
--
+1
Remove HBaseConfiguration.create() call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219805#comment-13219805
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
bq. Well, client's deleteRegion call is asynchronous so no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219808#comment-13219808
]
stack commented on HBASE-5454:
--
I'm +1 on commit for this. We can figure something similar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219839#comment-13219839
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Mubarak I see that this patch is modeled on HBASE-4213, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219843#comment-13219843
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
Oh, I forgot to mention that each step in the above should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219846#comment-13219846
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
One more thing, it would be sweet if the above were not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219845#comment-13219845
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
One more thing, it would be sweet if the above were not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219849#comment-13219849
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Mubarak Our comments crossed. See further up in this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219857#comment-13219857
]
stack commented on HBASE-5424:
--
Zhiyuan Why do you reference hbase-5165? You think it the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219858#comment-13219858
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
bq. I have thought this issue for a long time, and I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13219861#comment-13219861
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
Also, do you need to make a new version of this patch now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220165#comment-13220165
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Ted
bq. Do you think we should continue discussion on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220166#comment-13220166
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@N 1 out of 29 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220167#comment-13220167
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@N Probably should post the patch up on reviewboard.. its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220168#comment-13220168
]
stack commented on HBASE-5424:
--
Should we close this issue then Zhiyuan as fixed or will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220178#comment-13220178
]
stack commented on HBASE-5501:
--
Whats going on here Chunhui? You've opened a new issue w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220180#comment-13220180
]
stack commented on HBASE-5501:
--
Is this patch right? You have a disablessh flag. What about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220184#comment-13220184
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
bq. I have created a new issue and submit the new patch, what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220191#comment-13220191
]
stack commented on HBASE-5502:
--
For those following, this patch was committed to trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220192#comment-13220192
]
stack commented on HBASE-4403:
--
For those following behind, this patch went in in two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220199#comment-13220199
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
Ted: This has been raised already above as a concern and some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220219#comment-13220219
]
stack commented on HBASE-5451:
--
I wonder how Jimmy is doing stuff like the below:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220345#comment-13220345
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
bq. When we change the location of rename() call from master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220346#comment-13220346
]
stack commented on HBASE-4348:
--
@Himanshu That would be useful
Add metrics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220366#comment-13220366
]
stack commented on HBASE-4348:
--
Can you make it so the table doesn't bump up against the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220370#comment-13220370
]
stack commented on HBASE-5492:
--
bq. Your question can be converted into who is responsible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220377#comment-13220377
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
I did already at '01/Mar/12 17:17'
Provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220383#comment-13220383
]
stack commented on HBASE-3909:
--
@Jimmy
bq. we don't have to poll fs to find changes. We can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220680#comment-13220680
]
stack commented on HBASE-5494:
--
I think maybe region locks is for later. Meantime, getting a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220689#comment-13220689
]
stack commented on HBASE-5504:
--
bq. Since region splitting is disabled after step 3, how do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220693#comment-13220693
]
stack commented on HBASE-4348:
--
@Himanshu Yeah, a line on the end w/ count of regions one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220699#comment-13220699
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
--
@Mubarak Should we then close this issue as subsumed by the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220721#comment-13220721
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
Thats a wide variety in the types of failures. You get same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220739#comment-13220739
]
stack commented on HBASE-5419:
--
Well, maybe this is for 0.96 then? That ok w/ you Dhruba?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221023#comment-13221023
]
stack commented on HBASE-5504:
--
bq. I meant that data for the neighbor region we choose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221112#comment-13221112
]
stack commented on HBASE-4890:
--
Any more luck w/ this one J-D (or you got distracted?)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221157#comment-13221157
]
stack commented on HBASE-5451:
--
Can we have hbase go all-pb for hbase 0.96.0?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221159#comment-13221159
]
stack commented on HBASE-5451:
--
Thats a dumb question. Let me rephrase. Won't hbase be all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221170#comment-13221170
]
stack commented on HBASE-5451:
--
Client APIs should be the same but yeah, lets get up on pb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221179#comment-13221179
]
stack commented on HBASE-5504:
--
@Ted that takes me to a comment I made. I still am without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221643#comment-13221643
]
stack commented on HBASE-4890:
--
This NPE is a bit too easy to manufacture. Should we hold up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13222634#comment-13222634
]
stack commented on HBASE-5371:
--
Please integrate into 0.92 Ted. Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13222701#comment-13222701
]
stack commented on HBASE-5358:
--
This will do. +1
HBaseObjectWritable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223350#comment-13223350
]
stack commented on HBASE-5494:
--
@Ram Yes sir. Thanks. Resolved hbase-5373 as duplicate of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223401#comment-13223401
]
stack commented on HBASE-5531:
--
+1 on patch and +1 on commit to all of the branches cited
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223446#comment-13223446
]
stack commented on HBASE-5436:
--
Please commit to both Lars. Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223493#comment-13223493
]
stack commented on HBASE-5531:
--
I added him (See 'Administration' in JIRA. You should have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223523#comment-13223523
]
stack commented on HBASE-5533:
--
Did you mean the below:
{code}
-#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223615#comment-13223615
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@LarsH I think its too radical a change in client behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223660#comment-13223660
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@nkeywal yes, agree, good to deprecate in 0.94 rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223662#comment-13223662
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
... so it seems like there needs to be a separate patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223705#comment-13223705
]
stack commented on HBASE-5074:
--
@Dhruba Try resubmitting your patch too. We regularly see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13223887#comment-13223887
]
stack commented on HBASE-5534:
--
You should be able to do:
{code}
hbase shell script.rb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225041#comment-13225041
]
stack commented on HBASE-5480:
--
I don't have this class in 0.92 Andrew, so 0.92 should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225322#comment-13225322
]
stack commented on HBASE-5540:
--
Done. I missed adding it to the hbase group.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225566#comment-13225566
]
stack commented on HBASE-5543:
--
Yeah, it looks like its inevitable that we'll ask the server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225654#comment-13225654
]
stack commented on HBASE-5074:
--
Wahoo!!
Lars, you want to pull it into 0.94? (Does this mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225818#comment-13225818
]
stack commented on HBASE-5543:
--
bq. Instead of adding to the rpc to make it keep alive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225821#comment-13225821
]
stack commented on HBASE-5325:
--
This patch adds beans at org.apache.hbase, right? HBase and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225882#comment-13225882
]
stack commented on HBASE-5541:
--
Commit is fine.
What about case where the edits are applied,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225892#comment-13225892
]
stack commented on HBASE-5325:
--
HBase and RegionServer should be under org.apache.hbase too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225900#comment-13225900
]
stack commented on HBASE-5541:
--
Grand
Avoid holding the rowlock during HLog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226172#comment-13226172
]
stack commented on HBASE-5552:
--
Let me fix formatting:
{code}
hadoop
HBase
Master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226182#comment-13226182
]
stack commented on HBASE-5552:
--
As is, our naming is just broke. You can't have instances of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226200#comment-13226200
]
stack commented on HBASE-5325:
--
I took a look. Its broke (I'm to blame I'd say for it being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226238#comment-13226238
]
stack commented on HBASE-5533:
--
Line lengths are usually 80 chars in our src code Shaneal.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226296#comment-13226296
]
stack commented on HBASE-5552:
--
Its not incompatible change Todd because we've not had a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226341#comment-13226341
]
stack commented on HBASE-5552:
--
bq. Oh, does this not affect the other metrics published at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226356#comment-13226356
]
stack commented on HBASE-4542:
--
+1 on commit (Thanks for taking care of the this Mikhail)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226379#comment-13226379
]
stack commented on HBASE-5542:
--
I took a look. Patch looks good. I think this kinda work is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226385#comment-13226385
]
stack commented on HBASE-5213:
--
Thanks G.
hbase master stop does not bring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226414#comment-13226414
]
stack commented on HBASE-5520:
--
{code}
+ if (kv == null) {$
+throw new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226477#comment-13226477
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
The TestLRUDictionary test looks like it could be fatter.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226522#comment-13226522
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
That looks ok N? Will I commit?
Cut the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226532#comment-13226532
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. The above method allows to start computation at specified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226552#comment-13226552
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
I don't get this comment:
{code}
+#define the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226569#comment-13226569
]
stack commented on HBASE-5480:
--
bq. But this should go into 0.94, no?
Yes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226616#comment-13226616
]
stack commented on HBASE-:
--
It should come in as a utilty so you could do ./bin/hbase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226613#comment-13226613
]
stack commented on HBASE-:
--
It should come in as a utilty so you could do ./bin/hbase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226617#comment-13226617
]
stack commented on HBASE-5509:
--
I added some.
MR based copier for copying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226620#comment-13226620
]
stack commented on HBASE-5539:
--
So in below
{code}
+@Override
+void testRow(final
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226631#comment-13226631
]
stack commented on HBASE-5292:
--
+1 on commit.
getsize per-CF metric
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226637#comment-13226637
]
stack commented on HBASE-5528:
--
This is for 0.90?
Change retrying splitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226643#comment-13226643
]
stack commented on HBASE-5209:
--
Sorry. I missed that it was resolved.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226649#comment-13226649
]
stack commented on HBASE-5525:
--
Disable table, remove all content from fs under the table's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226647#comment-13226647
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Does v21 fix the bad decompress that you found above testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226653#comment-13226653
]
stack commented on HBASE-2817:
--
@Adrian So, IIRC, doesn't the first -Xmx win so if you pass
101 - 200 of 1551 matches
Mail list logo
