[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226961#comment-13226961
]
stack commented on HBASE-4890:
--
bq. Now we get IOE as the patch is applied.
And you used to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227234#comment-13227234
]
stack commented on HBASE-4890:
--
IOE is better than NPE. The IOE says what the error is.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227254#comment-13227254
]
stack commented on HBASE-2039:
--
A post by Jonathan Payne on G1 not working for him:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227253#comment-13227253
]
stack commented on HBASE-2039:
--
A post by Jonathan Payne on G1 not working for him:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227319#comment-13227319
]
stack commented on HBASE-5560:
--
Pardon me lads. Did not mean to confuse. Lars I was telling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227740#comment-13227740
]
stack commented on HBASE-5564:
--
The TreeSet is whats going to be used once the edits make it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227744#comment-13227744
]
stack commented on HBASE-5347:
--
bq. We are not actively pursuing this approach anymore due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227748#comment-13227748
]
stack commented on HBASE-5563:
--
Both regions were online?
Does this patch make the newest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227749#comment-13227749
]
stack commented on HBASE-5563:
--
Although, thats a bunch of failures. Want to retry your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227765#comment-13227765
]
stack commented on HBASE-5520:
--
We are reseeking to the start of the passed 'row'? Is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227803#comment-13227803
]
stack commented on HBASE-5560:
--
@Dhruba
In trunk:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227869#comment-13227869
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Is HLog versioned? If not, perhaps instead of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227898#comment-13227898
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
In TestLRUDictionary, we test a single entry in essence. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227908#comment-13227908
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Its the test of a single entry only which is not really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227920#comment-13227920
]
stack commented on HBASE-5561:
--
+1
Create HFileSystemFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227921#comment-13227921
]
stack commented on HBASE-4542:
--
+1 for 0.94. This is good stuff.
add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227923#comment-13227923
]
stack commented on HBASE-4542:
--
And Lars, I think it should be safe since its on toStringery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227929#comment-13227929
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Its a regular pattern only. Perhaps this does some decent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227934#comment-13227934
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
The tests do not have variety. I think we should add it here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227944#comment-13227944
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
Looks good.
Does stuff work as it used to after this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227969#comment-13227969
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. I think WAL_VERSION metadata is orthogonal to compression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228033#comment-13228033
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. I can add WAL_VERSION as v2 in the metadata.
Why not as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228157#comment-13228157
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Stop making this more complicated than it need be Ted.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228158#comment-13228158
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Stop making this more complicated than it need be Ted.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228160#comment-13228160
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@Nicolas What you make of Ted's comment above? You think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228161#comment-13228161
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
@Nicolas What you make of Ted's comment above? You think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228166#comment-13228166
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
@Ted I think you should resign ownership of this issue. You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228174#comment-13228174
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
@Chunhui Sorry. I thought I'd provided comments already on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228175#comment-13228175
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Let me have a go at it since Li Pi can't finish it just yet.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228180#comment-13228180
]
stack commented on HBASE-5128:
--
The only issue that I can see -- the bulk of the patch is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228185#comment-13228185
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. It is rare that I saw review comments in such tone:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228202#comment-13228202
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. PREFIX_COMPRESSION_V2, first cited by Stack, is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228204#comment-13228204
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
This is the failures we saw up on builds.apache.org? There
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228205#comment-13228205
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
bq. This debug message comes from StoreScanner to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228209#comment-13228209
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
bq. It is called by one of test cases.
Ok. Its package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228227#comment-13228227
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
What did you change Chunhui? And rather, could you attach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228236#comment-13228236
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
Ugh. Indexing JIRA lost my comment.
Looking at builds, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228241#comment-13228241
]
stack commented on HBASE-5059:
--
@Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228242#comment-13228242
]
stack commented on HBASE-5059:
--
@Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228453#comment-13228453
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
I committed to trunk. Can you make a version for 0.92 please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228460#comment-13228460
]
stack commented on HBASE-5572:
--
@N Thanks for digging in. So, it looks like your patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228464#comment-13228464
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
bq. Yes, this test is flaky... I reproduce the error on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228467#comment-13228467
]
stack commented on HBASE-5564:
--
Googling it, its either something is already listening on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228484#comment-13228484
]
stack commented on HBASE-5571:
--
Oh, any chance of a test?
Table will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228482#comment-13228482
]
stack commented on HBASE-5571:
--
This patch has much merit. Thanks for digging in on it.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228487#comment-13228487
]
stack commented on HBASE-5572:
--
Above sounds good. Would suggest we retain the test that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228496#comment-13228496
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
@Lars Yeah. Let me try this trunk patch. Its good for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228499#comment-13228499
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
The trunk patch went into 0.94. I committed it. So, just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228501#comment-13228501
]
stack commented on HBASE-5573:
--
Hurray!
Replace client ZooKeeper watchers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228548#comment-13228548
]
stack commented on HBASE-5574:
--
+1 Thanks Michael
DEFAULT_MAX_FILE_SIZE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228592#comment-13228592
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
hbase-5121 does mess w/ scanners... Seems like pretty issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228598#comment-13228598
]
stack commented on HBASE-5572:
--
+1 on patch. Waiting on hadoopqa...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228946#comment-13228946
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Here's my compressing, decompressing, compressing again,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228947#comment-13228947
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Here's my compressing, decompressing, compressing again,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228957#comment-13228957
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. I noticed the size of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228965#comment-13228965
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. It implies that WAL_VERSION is the same as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228976#comment-13228976
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. But we don't know if the current dictionary compression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228979#comment-13228979
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
I took a random set of 40 logs off our front end and did a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228981#comment-13228981
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
We need facility in wal like we have in hfile for printing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228985#comment-13228985
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. This would make developing a new compression scheme hard.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228986#comment-13228986
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
bq. This would make developing a new compression scheme hard.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228994#comment-13228994
]
stack commented on HBASE-5128:
--
@Jon Should go into 0.92 soon as ready. On...
bq. I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13228996#comment-13228996
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Can I get a +1 from someone else. Its not a big patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229022#comment-13229022
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
@Lars Generalizing the compression done here is out of scope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229024#comment-13229024
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Lars, I can't upload a patch to someone else's issue. Made a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229054#comment-13229054
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
I like your changes Todd. Nice fixup. Lars, let me post v28
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229064#comment-13229064
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
I reran compress, decompress, compress cycle over my 40 odd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229663#comment-13229663
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Li asked me lzma some of my logs from the wild. I did. W/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229771#comment-13229771
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Here's some WALs to compared compressed w/ patch v29 vs lzma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13229877#comment-13229877
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
@Ted Would suggest that in future you not piecemeal in your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230050#comment-13230050
]
stack commented on HBASE-5399:
--
I should have said, given you've repro'd in an older version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230428#comment-13230428
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
@Lars Good one.
Do not collect deleted KVs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230445#comment-13230445
]
stack commented on HBASE-5579:
--
+1 on patch
This was messing up bulk loaded data?
How did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230449#comment-13230449
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
I'll commit v30 then.
Thanks all for reviews, etc.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230456#comment-13230456
]
stack commented on HBASE-4608:
--
Now this is in, does that mean we can cut a 0.94RC0?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230642#comment-13230642
]
stack commented on HBASE-5587:
--
Thanks Eli for looking out for us. Could do this in 0.96.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230665#comment-13230665
]
stack commented on HBASE-5559:
--
Sujee Since you are learning how to contrib., how about your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230668#comment-13230668
]
stack commented on HBASE-5270:
--
Thanks Chunhui. Will apply after 0.92.1 leaves the gate so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230693#comment-13230693
]
stack commented on HBASE-5563:
--
+1 on committing everywhere, even into 0.92 (I've tagged RC0;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231491#comment-13231491
]
stack commented on HBASE-5549:
--
@N LGTM. Change reconnectAfterExpiry to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231507#comment-13231507
]
stack commented on HBASE-5568:
--
+1 Good find Chunhui.
Multi concurrent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231551#comment-13231551
]
stack commented on HBASE-5593:
--
@Ted You mean a unit test for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231553#comment-13231553
]
stack commented on HBASE-5588:
--
+1 on patch set
Deprecate/remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231557#comment-13231557
]
stack commented on HBASE-5563:
--
+1 on patch for trunk and 0.92 (again). Older regionids
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231698#comment-13231698
]
stack commented on HBASE-5593:
--
That is given directly to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231700#comment-13231700
]
stack commented on HBASE-5592:
--
I can revert. Would be interested in Bens' opinion first.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13231733#comment-13231733
]
stack commented on HBASE-5533:
--
Those metrics look beautiful.
NamedThreadFactory overlaps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232109#comment-13232109
]
stack commented on HBASE-5597:
--
I'd be fine committing this patch for now and opening another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232333#comment-13232333
]
stack commented on HBASE-5341:
--
I tried doing this but each time, though it built the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233734#comment-13233734
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
Your 'being extra clear' note needs to become the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233892#comment-13233892
]
stack commented on HBASE-5593:
--
Thanks David. Should be fixed now.
Reverse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233896#comment-13233896
]
stack commented on HBASE-5569:
--
Ok. Thanks for explaination. +1 on commit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233937#comment-13233937
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
You pass in the shell instance now instead of formatter when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233952#comment-13233952
]
stack commented on HBASE-5589:
--
@Jon OK. Then the order in the Interface is a mythology,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233990#comment-13233990
]
stack commented on HBASE-5589:
--
Good. Thanks.
Add of the offline call to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233992#comment-13233992
]
stack commented on HBASE-50:
Go for it Jesse. My guess is that a lot has changed since but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234004#comment-13234004
]
stack commented on HBASE-5594:
--
HBASE-5328 has a patch that includes removing the infinite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234006#comment-13234006
]
stack commented on HBASE-5604:
--
I considered that instead of writing sequence files when we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234032#comment-13234032
]
stack commented on HBASE-5604:
--
Oh, hfile has to be sorted too. At log splitting time, would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234086#comment-13234086
]
stack commented on HBASE-5584:
--
Load up the patch and resubmit the patch Ram. See if it
201 - 300 of 1551 matches
Mail list logo