[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253708#comment-13253708
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
It passed for me. Let me commit this monster.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253712#comment-13253712
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253714#comment-13253714
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
Mind opening new issues Jimmy to do outstanding work like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253734#comment-13253734
]
stack commented on HBASE-4336:
--
+1
Tell us more about the issue Jesse. When I do mvn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253778#comment-13253778
]
stack commented on HBASE-5604:
--
Remove the Date stuff. Just do basic ms.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253832#comment-13253832
]
stack commented on HBASE-5747:
--
TestWALPlayer is not because of this test and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253843#comment-13253843
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
I did too and trunk is also no longer complaining. The rat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253894#comment-13253894
]
stack commented on HBASE-5747:
--
@Mikhail I think it fair in cases like this where a bunch of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253974#comment-13253974
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
@Jimmy I think this is the biggest patch ever applied to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253975#comment-13253975
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
@Jimmy I think this is the biggest patch ever applied to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253985#comment-13253985
]
stack commented on HBASE-4336:
--
So, running test in a module scope, you cannot have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254213#comment-13254213
]
stack commented on HBASE-5747:
--
@Jon I can put it back. I pulled in that from original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254224#comment-13254224
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
Hmm... Its not hbase-3927 that broke compatibility, it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254227#comment-13254227
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
I'd suggest backing out HBASE-5256. Its a little weird in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254229#comment-13254229
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
Hmmm... not that easy. This one messes us up too...
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254441#comment-13254441
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
I looked at Ted's patch. That should do it. See if it makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254520#comment-13254520
]
stack commented on HBASE-5747:
--
But I didn't change anything! Does that mean Jon fixed it w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254794#comment-13254794
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
v2 works out on a cluster for me
hbase-3927
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254811#comment-13254811
]
stack commented on HBASE-5798:
--
Error is transient. Subsequent runs worked.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254827#comment-13254827
]
stack commented on HBASE-5792:
--
This is great Matteo. We need this. Yeah, agree, this tool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254869#comment-13254869
]
stack commented on HBASE-5792:
--
@Matteo NVM. I want to use this tool now so I'll take care
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254928#comment-13254928
]
stack commented on HBASE-5795:
--
No. Please include the unit test on commit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255034#comment-13255034
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
I just committed a tool over on HBASE-5792. It tests WALs.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255089#comment-13255089
]
stack commented on HBASE-5634:
--
+1
Fix The using the -details option will report
I'm glad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255201#comment-13255201
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Not sure I follow but I do know this patch more ambitious
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255295#comment-13255295
]
stack commented on HBASE-5802:
--
So, enable jmx emissions? Would suggest that your patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255304#comment-13255304
]
stack commented on HBASE-3614:
--
FYI 100 chars per line max and space around operators (this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255313#comment-13255313
]
stack commented on HBASE-5733:
--
Patch looks good to me. I like the test. The LOG.fatal is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255323#comment-13255323
]
stack commented on HBASE-5788:
--
Is MetricsStorage for Region metrics only? If so, call it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255325#comment-13255325
]
stack commented on HBASE-3585:
--
Have a patch Uma?
isLegalFamilyName() can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255344#comment-13255344
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
@Ram Read over the HLog comments. Its got stuff on why we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255644#comment-13255644
]
stack commented on HBASE-5792:
--
@Todd Thanks. I removed TestHLogBench over in HBASE-5808.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255645#comment-13255645
]
stack commented on HBASE-5788:
--
bq. TestRegionServerMetrics covers most of the functionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255667#comment-13255667
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
@Jimmy So every invocation will throw an exception?
{code}
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255778#comment-13255778
]
stack commented on HBASE-5620:
--
I made HBASE-5810 to apply this Jimmy. Good stuff.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255877#comment-13255877
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Looking at Lars patch.
On you 1. and 2. above, apparently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255885#comment-13255885
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Can we try and make Todd's work? It does some nice cleanup.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255937#comment-13255937
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
bq. We won't write more into the log (once we take the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255946#comment-13255946
]
stack commented on HBASE-5812:
--
Verify can deal w/ multiple logs and verify all logs were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255959#comment-13255959
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
@Lars But it own't matter right since the map we are getting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256043#comment-13256043
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
I made the hlog perf tool work on hdfs and ran some basic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256044#comment-13256044
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Ok on lars patch into 0.94.
Edits can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256085#comment-13256085
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
I tried to reproduce what JD is seeing on cluster using same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256087#comment-13256087
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
@Lars As to your patch being 'slower' when fewer threads, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256177#comment-13256177
]
stack commented on HBASE-5790:
--
This patch requires zk 3.4.x right but it doesn't check that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256185#comment-13256185
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Want me to make a test that does simple three threads with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256788#comment-13256788
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
You will need to pull in HLogPerformanceEvaluation. Copy it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256799#comment-13256799
]
stack commented on HBASE-5816:
--
Thanks for filing the issue Maryann. I think we need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256827#comment-13256827
]
stack commented on HBASE-5737:
--
I think this is weird '+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256835#comment-13256835
]
stack commented on HBASE-5823:
--
+1 on patch.
Hbck should be able to print
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256861#comment-13256861
]
stack commented on HBASE-5547:
--
Is the problem in #1 the client waiting on acks from all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256880#comment-13256880
]
stack commented on HBASE-5823:
--
I tried it. Seems to work.
Hbck should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256889#comment-13256889
]
stack commented on HBASE-5790:
--
@Ted Its not a runtime requirement that client or ensemble be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256921#comment-13256921
]
stack commented on HBASE-5677:
--
Xufeng So we should close this issue and backport hbase-5454
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256950#comment-13256950
]
stack commented on HBASE-5545:
--
The addtions to FSUtils are over the top but +1 on patch --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256956#comment-13256956
]
stack commented on HBASE-5547:
--
bq. ...but is definitely a concern and something that I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256968#comment-13256968
]
stack commented on HBASE-5782:
--
Sorry. Dumb. The tool calls system.exit. Let me fix in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256973#comment-13256973
]
stack commented on HBASE-5825:
--
The commit on HBASE-5782 broke TestHLog (It included a unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257036#comment-13257036
]
stack commented on HBASE-5799:
--
@Liyin Do we need this out on trunk? What commit on 0.89fb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257207#comment-13257207
]
stack commented on HBASE-5737:
--
@Ram I do not follow. Please rephrase.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257216#comment-13257216
]
stack commented on HBASE-5751:
--
When was it reverted Gregory? There was a long run of fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257219#comment-13257219
]
stack commented on HBASE-5349:
--
I wouldn't mind more detail.
Can our LRU be resized?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257226#comment-13257226
]
stack commented on HBASE-3614:
--
This could be final: '+ private RegionOperationMetrics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257230#comment-13257230
]
stack commented on HBASE-5751:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257241#comment-13257241
]
stack commented on HBASE-5737:
--
The above is from AM? If so, I'm not sure it a bug. At the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257244#comment-13257244
]
stack commented on HBASE-5827:
--
This seems like something we need if cps are to be able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257252#comment-13257252
]
stack commented on HBASE-5816:
--
Great stuff Maryann. Where is the above bit of code from? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257255#comment-13257255
]
stack commented on HBASE-5816:
--
Should we have the servershutdownhandler and the balancer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257647#comment-13257647
]
stack commented on HBASE-5831:
--
@Todd We can do that and then require it. Nkeyway has a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257704#comment-13257704
]
stack commented on HBASE-5829:
--
Please explain where the disparity between this.server and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257729#comment-13257729
]
stack commented on HBASE-5816:
--
@Maryann Agree on your 1., and 2. above. Its possible to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257743#comment-13257743
]
stack commented on HBASE-5654:
--
@Jon Our hadoopqa has been hanging with a while. Its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257760#comment-13257760
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
Sorry Jesse for taking a while to get back to this. Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257773#comment-13257773
]
stack commented on HBASE-5831:
--
@Todd That'd be nice (smile)
This test run did 936 tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257787#comment-13257787
]
stack commented on HBASE-3614:
--
Since you renamed RegionOperationMetrics, is this right now:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257810#comment-13257810
]
stack commented on HBASE-5547:
--
bq. To get a guaranteed consistent snapshot the RegionServers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257849#comment-13257849
]
stack commented on HBASE-5824:
--
+1 on the Jimmy patch.
@Elliott At least add a deprecate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257886#comment-13257886
]
stack commented on HBASE-5836:
--
+1
Backport per region metrics from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257914#comment-13257914
]
stack commented on HBASE-5621:
--
Want to put your patch up here Jimmy and run it by hadoopqa?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257925#comment-13257925
]
stack commented on HBASE-5831:
--
Thanks Jon. I tried it over in HBASE-5794, setting it back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258006#comment-13258006
]
stack commented on HBASE-5833:
--
Eh, Ted, builds.apache.org is a public web site. I do not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258008#comment-13258008
]
stack commented on HBASE-5831:
--
@Jon Hmm.. yes. You are right. Both times it passed. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258011#comment-13258011
]
stack commented on HBASE-3614:
--
@Todd This issue just exposes metrics that were already being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258297#comment-13258297
]
stack commented on HBASE-5824:
--
This patch only makes sense in trunk, not in 0.94.
What are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115787#comment-13115787
]
stack commented on HBASE-4496:
--
Good find Lars.
HFile V2 does not honor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115788#comment-13115788
]
stack commented on HBASE-4497:
--
Do we need to add an extra tickle of OPENING znode after open
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115822#comment-13115822
]
stack commented on HBASE-4352:
--
I signed up to check we don't break rolling restart. Let me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115828#comment-13115828
]
stack commented on HBASE-4497:
--
Thanks J-D. Thats what I was too lazy to looksee for myself.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115833#comment-13115833
]
stack commented on HBASE-4494:
--
Are you back Kay Kay?
AvroServer:: get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115972#comment-13115972
]
stack commented on HBASE-4480:
--
@Ted You want to check this in? Where? Into src/test/bin?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13115978#comment-13115978
]
stack commented on HBASE-4480:
--
@Jesse Sounds good
Testing script to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116023#comment-13116023
]
stack commented on HBASE-4448:
--
I agree with your Every little bit helps. (I am working on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116660#comment-13116660
]
stack commented on HBASE-4485:
--
@Amit Great stuff. I like the reasoning above especially the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116684#comment-13116684
]
stack commented on HBASE-4344:
--
Looking at v12. Minor nits. Can fix on commit. Small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116708#comment-13116708
]
stack commented on HBASE-4377:
--
@Jon So you want me to review whats over in github and commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116721#comment-13116721
]
stack commented on HBASE-4497:
--
bq. startcode and timestamp is what i initially thought of.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116727#comment-13116727
]
stack commented on HBASE-4497:
--
I just checked the checkAndPut. It doesn't expose timestamp.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116770#comment-13116770
]
stack commented on HBASE-4207:
--
I learned that this parallel mechanism only works if you do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116837#comment-13116837
]
stack commented on HBASE-4336:
--
@Gary How is the security as a profile going? You still need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13117007#comment-13117007
]
stack commented on HBASE-4497:
--
Good stuff Ming.
Looking at your pathological case, I think
901 - 1000 of 1551 matches
Mail list logo