Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
@zwoop rebase & clang-format
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
clang-format fixed. @zwoop
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r72571589
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixConnection.cc ---
@@ -320,14 +320,15 @@ Connection::connect(sockaddr const *target,
NetVCOptions const )
int res
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r72571991
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1296,7 +1294,7 @@ UnixNetVConnection::connectUp(EThread *t, int fd)
}
if (fd
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
@bryancall update the enums.
```
NET_VCONNECTION_UNSET,
NET_VCONNECTION_IN, // Client <--> ATS, Client-Side
NET_VCONNECTION_OUT, // ATS <--> Server,
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
@masaori335 JIRA issue created.
BTW what is the proposal review progress ?
Is it same as the bug report progress ? create JIRA issue then create PR ?
---
If your project is set up
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
@jpeach SessionAccept is a interface to create ClientSession. Its mutex is
NULL, it is not safe to release any resource. The caller to SessionAccept is
Trampline that mutex is copy from NetVC
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
@bryancall to review the codes of ClusterHandlerBase.cc
```
979 thread = eventProcessor.eventthread[ET_CLUSTER][id %
num_of_cluster_threads];
980 if (net_vc
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
@jpeach Do you means L175 ~ L184 in proxy/http/HttpSessionAccept.h ?
```
175 /**
176The continuation mutex is NULL to allow parellel accepts in NT. No
177state is recorded
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771#discussion_r71296490
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -465,6 +433,9 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
epd = (EventIO *)get_ev_data(pd, x
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771#discussion_r71490427
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -465,6 +433,9 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
epd = (EventIO *)get_ev_data(pd, x
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/766#discussion_r71065565
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ UnixNetVConnection::mainEvent(int event, Event *e)
(write.vio.mutex
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/766#discussion_r71065621
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ UnixNetVConnection::mainEvent(int event, Event *e)
(write.vio.mutex
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/766
This is a InactivityCop minor issue. @bryancall
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
@jpeach agree with u to return bool from SessionAccept::accept().
SessionAccept did not consume any parameters, It is just transfer
parameters to ClientSession.
as your said "
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
Due to multi types of SessionAccept, I'm change the return type of
SessionAccept::accept() from void to int and free the MIOBuffer in
ProtocolProbeTrampoline::ioCompletionEvent
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
TS-4697: free MIOBuffer if fails on ipallow check.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/oknet/trafficserver TS-4697
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
clang-format is done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771#discussion_r71972136
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -465,6 +433,9 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
epd = (EventIO *)get_ev_data(pd, x
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
update iocore/cluster/ClusterHandlerBase.cc @bryancall @zwoop
but I have no environment to perform cluster system test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
@bryancall I'm found open_list also used in Cluster.
file: iocore/cluster/ClusterHandlerBase.cc
```
1007 case ClusterHandler::CLCON_CONN_BIND_CLEAR: {
1008
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823#discussion_r75058577
--- Diff: iocore/net/I_SessionAccept.h ---
@@ -29,12 +29,40 @@
struct AclRecord;
+/**
+ The base class SessionAccept can
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/772
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/772
@zwoop ok, close this PR and wait for @alhonen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1275
Got it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1345
@bcall Sorry, I'm not familiar with HttpSM. Also I think this issue is
covered in the topic that "Kees Spoelstra" described in
secur...@trafficserver.apache.org.
20
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1276
Sorry, I'm busy on our product release. I will update this PR recently.
2017-02-11 11:02 GMT+08:00 Phil Sorber <notificati...@github.com>:
> @oknet <https://gith
GitHub user oknet opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1333
PluginVC::inactive_event is not set to NULL after cancelled.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user oknet closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1333
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1334
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user oknet opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1345
Crash on retry to open server connection with POST transformed content.
We have a plugin, it is working on POST transform.
ATS crash if a client sent the request:
```
telnet
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1334
Do not reschedule the periodic inactive_event and cancel it after signal
timeout event to SM
this resolve issue 1333
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1334
Link it to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3235
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1334
The inactive_event is a periodic event that is create by
eventProcessor.schedule_every().
We should not reschedule it by schedule_in().
We cancelled it by call_event->cancel() e
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1326
I only saw the TS-4363 once and can not repeat it. How about your issue ?
Is it repeatable ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1175
I think the message at below indicate your run-time openssl library is
different from your build server.
```
/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8: Undefined symbol
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/863
@zwoop Looks good to me!
@shinrich we are defined too many get_remote_*() method, my suggest is only
keep one from get_remote_addr() and get_remote_endpoint()
---
If your project is set up
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/701
change the assert condition from (r==0) to (r!=0)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1276
There is another bug that related to "proxy.config.socks.default_servers",
I will make a backport for TS-5106 to fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1412
and HttpSM::history is needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1509
TS-5106: Create ParentRoundRobin object as ParentRecord->selection_strategy
for default parent proxy server
(cherry picked from commit 7ffe037845f45497aa9e95919a3a7bc0ca288
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1511
heap-use-after-free: Access ua_session after HttpTunnel::chain_abort_all
called due to bad post chunked data
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1412
Can you show me the netvc_context of the UnixNetVConnection ? in order to
identify the side of it (client vc or server vc ?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1412
I found a bug related to this issue:
HttpSM::state_request_wait_for_transform_read could receive the
VC_EVENT_EOS, VC_EVENT_ERROR from TransformTerminus::handle_event and transfer
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1510
Crash at HttpSM::state_request_wait_for_transform_read
In the function, it is try to get int64_t from 'data':
int64_t size = *((int64_t)data);
But TransformTerminus
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1510
we should always callback EVENT_ERROR or EVENT_EOS with VIO as data value.
a nullptr as data is bad idea here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1510
@bryancall @zwoop Could you please assign someone to review this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1472
"TS-3100: Extend tr-pass to allow malformed HTTP GET requests to be blind
tunneled." is added by @shinrich .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r77108646
--- Diff: iocore/net/I_NetVConnection.h ---
@@ -566,6 +573,21 @@ class NetVConnection : public VConnection
is_transparent = state
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r77107845
--- Diff: iocore/net/P_SSLNetVConnection.h ---
@@ -101,26 +101,13 @@ class SSLNetVConnection : public UnixNetVConnection
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r77109780
--- Diff: iocore/net/I_NetVConnection.h ---
@@ -566,6 +573,21 @@ class NetVConnection : public VConnection
is_transparent = state
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/850
Should we define LogFile::free() first ?
The Ptr::clear() need free() to dealloc the LogFile.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947
according your description, the HttpTunnel transfers the data from server
session to client session, ATS received a RST from client and the connection
between ATS and origin server is still
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947
comments for codes:
```
if (get_ev_events(pd, x) & (EVENTIO_READ | EVENTIO_ERROR)) {
// ** set read.triggered if a epoll event of net has EVENTIO_READ
or EVENTIO_E
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r77499140
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -542,7 +555,14 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
close_UnixNetVConnection(vc
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/701
Copy bug in load_buffer_and_write() if 0 returned from write() or
writev().
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/721#discussion_r77122696
--- Diff: proxy/http/HttpSM.cc ---
@@ -6890,7 +6890,8 @@ HttpSM::update_stats()
int offset = 0;
int skip = 0
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
Depend on @jpeach's suggestion:
- the return type of set_context is void now.
- add ink_assert inside set_context()
Also:
- set NET_VCONNECTION_UNSET to 0 in the enum
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/831
@zwoop @pbchou Looks good to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/831#discussion_r77137573
--- Diff: doc/admin-guide/files/records.config.en.rst ---
@@ -2703,6 +2703,14 @@ Logging Configuration
The number of seconds between
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947
EVENTIO_ERROR means EPOLLHUP | EPOLLERR | EPOLLPRI.
EPOLLPRI means OOB or TCP URG is set. You will always receive EPOLLPRI with
EPOLLIN.
To EPOLLPRI, we need handle READ first
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/952
TS-4804: Add r into total_written only if r > 0
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/oknet/trafficserver TS-4804
Alternativ
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/952
@zwoop negative means error. man 2 writev:
RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion the number of bytes which were written is
returned. Otherwise, a -1 is returned
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947
The InactivityCop will handle those netvc that read or write disabled.
InactivityCop will send TIMEOUT to SM or call close_UnixNetVConnection() to
close netvc directly depend on the last
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947
looks good to me. @jpeach, Can you review the finial code ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/831
backport +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/937
@jpeach It is conditional assert on lock check. Do u means keep the if
statement and ink_abort inside it ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
rebase after TS-4779
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/701
@jpeach Could you please review this PR? I think this is final version.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r78126177
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -270,6 +270,21 @@ read_from_net(NetHandler *nh, UnixNetVConnection *vc,
EThread *thread
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r78126610
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -270,6 +270,21 @@ read_from_net(NetHandler *nh, UnixNetVConnection *vc,
EThread *thread
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r78128086
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -270,6 +270,21 @@ read_from_net(NetHandler *nh, UnixNetVConnection *vc,
EThread *thread
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r78127044
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -270,6 +270,21 @@ read_from_net(NetHandler *nh, UnixNetVConnection *vc,
EThread *thread
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r78127251
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -270,6 +270,21 @@ read_from_net(NetHandler *nh, UnixNetVConnection *vc,
EThread *thread
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1068
@jpeach Good job!
And I have my own thoughts on AcceptOptions optimization, but it is quite
basic and rough.
1. class NetVCOptions as base class and defined in
iocore/net
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
TS-4879: Checking con.fd == NO_FD while we get return from
check_emergency_throttle()
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
bugfix: In do_blocking_accept(), we should check the con.fd == NO_FD while
we get return from check_emergency_throttle().
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033#discussion_r79530800
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1273,14 +1273,21 @@ UnixNetVConnection::connectUp(EThread *t, int fd)
con.is_bound
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753#discussion_r79531880
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetAccept.cc ---
@@ -281,29 +280,30 @@ NetAccept::do_blocking_accept(EThread *t)
return -1
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
@jpeach , There is a similar bug in NetAccept::do_blocking_accept() which
belongs to ACCEPT side instead of CONNECT side. Should I combine them together
in one commit or 2 commits respectively
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033#discussion_r79531088
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1273,14 +1273,21 @@ UnixNetVConnection::connectUp(EThread *t, int fd)
con.is_bound
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
updated per @jpeach 's comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033#discussion_r79530993
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNetVConnection.cc ---
@@ -1273,14 +1273,21 @@ UnixNetVConnection::connectUp(EThread *t, int fd)
con.is_bound
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1040
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
@jpeach updated upon your comments. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
@jpeach @bryancall add comments and details in commit message
```
Load the NetVCs from open_list to cop_list before next InactivityCop
runs. NetHandler will remove NetVC from cop_list
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1040
TS-4885: Correct the calculation of fds_throttle and fds_limit
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/oknet/trafficserver TS
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/753
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r77764403
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -525,7 +531,17 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
close_UnixNetVConnection(vc
Github user oknet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/947#discussion_r77765559
--- Diff: iocore/net/UnixNet.cc ---
@@ -525,7 +531,17 @@ NetHandler::mainNetEvent(int event, Event *e)
close_UnixNetVConnection(vc
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/701
agree with @jpeach 's comments and code suggestion. With minor modify that
only assert on ( r == 0 ) because of (r < 0) means error on write().
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user oknet reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
TS-4612: Proposal: InactivityCop Optimize
Optimize InactivityCop on a heavy load and high level concurrent connection
system.
It is set default inactivity timeout before put vc
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
rebased on master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/937
TS-2482: Fix Socks Proxy bugs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/oknet/trafficserver TS-2482
Alternatively you can review
Github user oknet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/771
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/937
@zwoop ink_release_assert added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user oknet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1203
TS-2482: Should use target_addr instead of server_addr when build socks
request
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/oknet
Github user oknet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1175
backport to 6.2.1.
2016-11-04 21:32 GMT+08:00 Christian Haynes <notificati...@github.com>:
> Closed #1175 <https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1175>
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
