Hi,
i try since some days get the ivtv driver working but without success.
First i started with 0.2.x and patch it using documentation on
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/CoolConfigurations.
This patch helps me, get ivtv.ko loaded without and direct segmentation
fault (without modification i get
it with the date,
e.g.
ivtv-20051005
or
ivtv-0.3.9-20051005
-Cory
--
*
* Cory Papenfuss*
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student
Still no luck getting
$ ivtvctl --log-status to work...
ioctl IVTV_IOC_LOG_BOARD_STATUS to work...
However, since last patch sound is working, with stereo (tested it with
mixer since log-status was not working for me)... It is too early to
tell if I have sound on ALL channels, but I'm
, that's quite confusing. I suggest that a version
be a version... not to change. If it's a snapshot, version it with
the date, e.g.
ivtv-20051005
or
ivtv-0.3.9-20051005
-Cory
If you've downloaded from www.ivtv.tv, then that file is just a mirror
of the latest 0.3.9 svn available.
I've changed
Is a version number such as 0.3.9 actually a current svn snapshot?
If so, that's quite confusing. I suggest that a version be a version...
not to change. If it's a snapshot, version it with the date, e.g.
ivtv-20051005
or
ivtv-0.3.9-20051005
-Cory
If you've downloaded from www.ivtv.tv
? If so, that's quite confusing. I suggest that a version
be a version... not to change. If it's a snapshot, version it with
the date, e.g.
ivtv-20051005
or
ivtv-0.3.9-20051005
-Cory
If you've downloaded from www.ivtv.tv, then that file is just a mirror
of the latest 0.3.9 svn available
On 10/4/05, Keith C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 4, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Mercury Morris wrote:On 9/23/05, Adam Forsyth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I just gave up and am now using the tveeprom that came with mykernel. But I'd still love to know what the cx88xx / cx8800 module isfor.Hello,
On 10/4/05, John Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh and in addition to my last mail moving to revision 2743 may reduce that
50% to more like 25%. It doesn't stop it happening but it does burn less cpu
when it happens.
John,
can you make a binary of the x driver with the recent changes in svn
Probably not till the end of the week.
Sorry going to be busy most nights until then and any
spare time i have i want to try and get one more fix
to reduce the cpu usage in before Hans releases 0.3.9.
John
--- Petter Gundersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 10/4/05, John Harvey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:42:35AM -0400, Ross wrote:
On 10/5/05, Hans Verkuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is the purpose of this mirror? The latest svn source can
already be downloaded directly from
http://ivtvdriver.org/viewcvs/ivtv/trunk/.
Agreed. Is the tarball
On Oct 4, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Folashade Adeyosoye wrote:
Thanks all for your support. Am ssh'ing into my box at home and
configuring
and just wanted to run this you guys to see if you see things looks
good
Thanks
I think this is part of a thread I've already responded to, but since
the
On Oct 4, 2005, at 11:39 PM, Eric Schwartz wrote:
I've had this working on earlier ivtv versions but naturally I can't
recall which version was working. :)
I have only one PVR-500MCE in my system. I can't seem to get any data
at all from /dev/video1-- when I do a
dd if=/dev/video1
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 23:45, Keith C wrote:
On Oct 4, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Mercury Morris wrote:
On 9/23/05, Adam Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I just gave up and am now using the tveeprom that came with my
kernel. But I'd still love to know what the cx88xx / cx8800 module is
I am kinda irritated now, why was this done, ivtv.tv requested to be
shutdown???
I have my donations page there, and other information, and I have used
the site for development needs of my own to improve ivtv in the future,
not sure why it's being so targeted to be removeed, and no consideration
Paul Koster wrote:
Chris Kennedy wrote:
I am kinda irritated now, why was this done, ivtv.tv requested to be
shutdown???
Over the past weeks the mailinglist contains various E-mails by
various authors that express the confusion that http://www.ivtv.tv
causes. There's a lot of information
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 18:52, Chris Kennedy wrote:
I am kinda irritated now, why was this done, ivtv.tv requested to be
shutdown???
I have my donations page there, and other information, and I have used
the site for development needs of my own to improve ivtv in the future,
not sure
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 18:51, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 05:13, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Hello,
I bought one of those add-on cards from Hauppauge
that provides an extra set of svid/composite inputs
via the white header on the card.
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 18:52, Chris Kennedy wrote:
I am kinda irritated now, why was this done, ivtv.tv requested to be
shutdown???
I have my donations page there, and other information, and I have used
the site for development needs of my own to improve ivtv in
A week or so back I moved the contents of the 'patches' directory and a
few things from the 'utils' directory into 'misc'.
It's my feeling that these files probably shouldn't be in the
distribution itself, but instead in a directory on dl.ivtvdriver.org
(and linked to from the wiki).
Anyone
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:43, Tyler Trafford wrote:
A week or so back I moved the contents of the 'patches' directory and a
few things from the 'utils' directory into 'misc'.
It's my feeling that these files probably shouldn't be in the
distribution itself, but instead in a directory on
The latest svn source can already be downloaded directly from
http://ivtvdriver.org/viewcvs/ivtv/trunk/. The ivtvdriver.org wiki needs
to be updated to clearly point to this but other than that I see no reason
for this mirrored archive (except for confusing people :-).
Since you're talking
On Wednesday 05 Oct 2005 21:00, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:43, Tyler Trafford wrote:
A week or so back I moved the contents of the 'patches' directory and a
few things from the 'utils' directory into 'misc'.
It's my feeling that these files probably shouldn't be
Sounds ideal to me.
I use the 0.2 branch, I'll help with the testing for the new patch, although I'm only running the 2.6.11 kernel (RHEL/CentOS 4.1).
Very happy to see 0.3.x go stable, and think the version number system will really help save confusion for new users.
Many thanks for
I fully 2nd Chris. And I appreciate the option to identify an expert and
pay him $$ for application-specific development that can be folded back
into the open source community.
Joe Briggs
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 14:02 -0500, Chris Kennedy wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005
A 0.2 driver that will compile on kernel 2.6.13? Sweet, that will make
it easy for me to compare 0.2 and 0.3.9 to see if there are any quality
differences. Maybe I can do that over the weekend.
And to make sure if I understand correctly, the goal is to have:
0.2 as the obsolescent version
0.4
On Sunday 02 October 2005 8:31 pm, Philip Rowlands wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
On Thursday 29 September 2005 1:01 am, Adam Forsyth wrote:
Have you tried using a serial terminal or anything to catch a kernel
oops? There was some talk about that on this list recently.
Jacques Facquet wrote:
Hello,
found this:
line 1331/1336 revision 2753
info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cx25840_info), GFP_KERNEL);
i2c_set_clientdata(client, info);
if (info == NULL) {
kfree(client);
return -ENOMEM;
}
why not ?
On 10/6/05, Hans Verkuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone update the download info page on the ivtv.writeme.ch wiki?
http://ivtv.writeme.ch/tiki-index.php?page=DownloadIvyTv
It still points to ivtv.tv instead of dl.ivtvdriver.org.
Done.
Ross
Does ivtv 3.x work with this board
http://www.yuan.com.tw/en/products/vdo_pg600-2.html
Appears to be equivalent to the PVR-150 boards, but uses a silicon tuner.
They also appear to do a dual tuner version.
http://www.yuan.com.tw/en/products/vdo_pg670.html
Cheers
Steve
Here is the kernel message when I play livetv (this works fine and even video footage looks correct):
ivtv-osd warning: Need to adjust to width 720 src_w 720 dst_w 720 src_x 0 dst_x 0
ivtv-osd warning: Need to adjust to height 480 src_h 480 dst_h 480 src_y 0 dst_y 0
ivtv-osd warning: Source video:
On 10/6/05, Adam Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under development navigation section remove the Subversion link,
and change the Trac link to Trac Subversion Info or something
like that, since the info on the subversion repository is there. If
someone actually wants to browse the subversion
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:04:30PM +1000, Ross wrote:
On 10/6/05, Adam Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under development navigation section remove the Subversion link,
and change the Trac link to Trac Subversion Info or something
like that, since the info on the subversion repository is
as long as the parts are individually supported (ie
the tuner is supported), then ivtv can be pretty
trivially made to support these cards.
there will probably have to be some minor changes to
the driver, but once someone has the hardware, it
should be easy.
famous last words :)
-tmk
---
33 matches
Mail list logo
