Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I just added myself to the Who we are page, regenerated it and
: committed the changes. Now I tried to update the website by doing:
: ssh people.apache.org
: cd /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs
: svn up
just to clarify: is that what you tried because you saw it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470313
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-794:
-
There is indeed some Java 1.5 code in contrib/ I believe the
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Mark Harwood (JIRA) wrote:
(CachedTokenStream perhaps?)
In KS, I used TokenBatch, which is currently implemented as an
array of Tokens which reallocates itself in big chunks (10, 100, 200,
400, 800, etc).
(Implementing TokenStream leads to completely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470379
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794:
I switched to accepting an analyzer and a field name. I need the field name
deprecate Directory.renameFile()
Key: LUCENE-795
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-795
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Store
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber closed LUCENE-795.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
deprecate Directory.renameFile()
I've been looking at 762. It does look a bit hairy, dealing with all the
protection levels of the classes. Did you come up with an approach you
were happy with?
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:57 AM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470409
]
Ken Geis commented on LUCENE-636:
-
I was able to work around this problem by using AspectJ to intercept calls to
I have a solution for the protection level (see my last comment on
adding an Interface), but not for the ThreadLocal issue in LazyField
construction (see the bug). I think I may just stick with the
original patch, unless someone has an insight. I guess I could pass
in the ThreadLocal and
I need to read the TokenStream at least twice
I used the horribly hackey but quick-for-me method of adding a
method to MemoryIndex that accepts a List of Tokens. Any ideas?
I'm not sure about modifying MemoryIndex. It should be easy enough
to create a subclass of TokenStream -
10 matches
Mail list logo
