I would suggest that instead of adding a lot of methods to SpellChecker
that mimic IndexWRiter methods, we instead make SpellChecker easier to
subclass by making "spellIndex" protected, and refactoring the "new
IndexWriter" code sprinkled throughout the class into a new method that
subclasses can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484634
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-431:
---
Thanks for the advice :) Alas, I had already tried that on th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484632
]
Joe Shaw commented on LUCENE-431:
-
Michael: mysterious patch failures like that are usually caused by problems
with
Karin,
Could you please add this to Lucene's JIRA as an Enhancement?
I can just add the setters now, but other Lucene developers are making changes
to how mergeFactor and maxBufferedDocs work. Those two parameters may also get
deprecated in the process, so it would be better to wait for those c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484546
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-431:
---
Michael, the patch problem seems to be something on my end, wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484542
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-431:
---
>> I'd like to test this net performance gain with LUCENE-843.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484535
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-431:
-
> I'd like to test this net performance gain with LUCENE-843.
Yes, it wou
Doron Cohen wrote:
Is this manual spamming or some robot doing it?
Would a "what characters in the image" question block a spam robot..?
For manual spamming, in the same line - would a "trivia Lucene/code
question" block at least some spammers?
Just a thought, though I don't know there is suffici
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Matt Ericson wrote:
I am new to the group and was wondering why lucene is still on java 1.4 ?
Have you thought about moving to 1.5 ? What are the reasons for keeping it
1.4 ?
One of the reasons was that gcj [1][2] doesn't support Java 1.5. That's
changing with the 4.
Is this manual spamming or some robot doing it?
Would a "what characters in the image" question block a spam robot..?
For manual spamming, in the same line - would a "trivia Lucene/code
question" block at least some spammers?
Just a thought, though I don't know there is sufficient infrastructure fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-431:
-
Attachment: lucene-431.zip
Mike,
that's strange for me the patch applies cleanly on the curr
Another thing I am working on is getting change notifications sent to
the commits list, so that we will (hopefully) notice these kinds of
changes sooner. I am not sure about the asking part, as I don't know
who would want that job.
At any rate, the bottom line is we should keep an eye out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484518
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-831:
-
I haven't looked at the patch yet. However, I do know that a coll
27 mar 2007 kl. 18.13 skrev Matt Ericson:
I am new to the group and was wondering why lucene is still on
java 1.4 ?
Have you thought about moving to 1.5 ? What are the reasons for
keeping it 1.4 ?
See this thread for more info:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-and-Java-1.5-tf1690825.html
I am new to the group and was wondering why lucene is still on java
1.4 ?
Have you thought about moving to 1.5 ? What are the reasons for
keeping it 1.4 ?
Thank you
Matt
On Mar 27, 2007, at 4:21 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I regularly build/test/run on both OS X and XP and Debian. Luce
I regularly build/test/run on both OS X and XP and Debian. Lucene is
targeted at JDK 1.4, but most people run it under 1.5 and I venture
that some run it on 1.6.
On Mar 27, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Raman Kaur wrote:
Hi,
I have few questions about lucene builds and t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484383
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-431:
---
Michael, I wasn't able to cleanly apply this patch on the curr
Hi spellcheck developers,
as users might not always have the administrative power to change
their ulimit settings (on *nix systems), it might be useful to include
two new parameters
indexMergeFactor and indexMaxBufferedDocs
and their respective setter methods in
org.apache.lucene.search.spe
18 matches
Mail list logo
