See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/813/changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1494:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1494-masking.patch
some things looked like they wouldn't work with the masking patch,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch
Fixed and cleaned up more.
All tests pass
Added entry in
Sorry. My mistake.
-Mike
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> You may want to ask your question on java-u...@lucene.apache.org
>
> -J
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Michael Masters
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I just started to use lucene recent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch
* Ok, fixed the ensureContiguousMerge exception by asking
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 00:47, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>> Did I miss something, or when trunk switched to collecting on
>> SegmentReaders we've lost proper scores?
>> I mean, before score depended on TF calculated across all the index,
>> and n
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> Did I miss something, or when trunk switched to collecting on
> SegmentReaders we've lost proper scores?
> I mean, before score depended on TF calculated across all the index,
> and now it depends on TF for a given segment (yup, unless I mi
Did I miss something, or when trunk switched to collecting on
SegmentReaders we've lost proper scores?
I mean, before score depended on TF calculated across all the index,
and now it depends on TF for a given segment (yup, unless I missed
something).
Per-segment TF can vary wildly, especially in ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704785#action_12704785
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. add an API to Collector for it to declare if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch
{quote} Would you re-use MergePolicy, or make a new
RAMMer
So I understand from your responses that you think that 2.9 should include
as much as possible, so that a user will have ~0 work upgrading from 2.9 to
3.0, assuming he upgraded fully to 2.9 (moved to use the not-deprecated APIs
etc.).
If 3.0 is supposed to be released quickly after 2.9 then this ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1611.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.4.2
Thanks Christiaan!
> Do not launch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704760#action_12704760
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
Ok I'll start with just adding nextDoc and advanc
Hi Mike,
You may want to ask your question on java-u...@lucene.apache.org
-J
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Michael Masters wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I just started to use lucene recently. Great project BTW. I was
> wondering if anyone has suggested making an open source version of
> dbsi
Hello Everyone,
I just started to use lucene recently. Great project BTW. I was
wondering if anyone has suggested making an open source version of
dbsight (www.dbsight.net/). I've just started using it and I think it
would be awesome if it was open source. Does anyone know of a project
that's like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704721#action_12704721
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1593:
--
bq. Yonik does Solr have any Scorers that it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704720#action_12704720
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1593:
-
I made Weight a subclass of Query and a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704711#action_12704711
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1252:
Here's a simple example that migh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704705#action_12704705
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. BooleanScorer could be autom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704702#action_12704702
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
{quote}
IndexSearcher creates the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704703#action_12704703
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
Yonik does Solr have any Scorers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704699#action_12704699
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. This is also not backward com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704693#action_12704693
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
One further optimization can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704692#action_12704692
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. What will TermQuery do?
Oh:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704674#action_12704674
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1593:
--
Query objects are relatively abstract. Weigh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704665#action_12704665
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. I think one cannot even call
I think 3.0 should be a fast turnaround after 2.9? Ie, no "new
development" should take place? We should remove deprecated APIs,
change defaults, etc., but that's about it. (I think this is how past
major releases worked?). It's a "fast switch". Which then means we
need to do all the hard work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704642#action_12704642
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. docsInOrder() would be an implementation deta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704640#action_12704640
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1593:
--
docsInOrder() would be an implementation deta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1607:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1607.patch
bq. Yonik, the string is being interned twice in your latest patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704633#action_12704633
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. I think after check(N) is called, one cannot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704631#action_12704631
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. I mean, instead of having the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704632#action_12704632
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. So should I add this check()?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704628#action_12704628
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1313:
{quote}
Perhaps the best way to m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704618#action_12704618
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1518:
-
Paul: ...The current patch at LUCENE-1345 does not need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704613#action_12704613
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1518:
-
Shai,
Regarding pure ranked, CSQ is really what we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704609#action_12704609
]
Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-1518 at 4/30/09 5:30 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704609#action_12704609
]
Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-1518 at 4/30/09 5:29 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704609#action_12704609
]
Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-1518 at 4/30/09 5:27 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704609#action_12704609
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1518:
--
bq. Create a FilterWeight which wraps a Filte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704605#action_12704605
]
Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-1518 at 4/30/09 5:19 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704608#action_12704608
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. BTW, I wonder if instead of "Query.scoresDocs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704605#action_12704605
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1518:
--
How about materializing the DocIds _and_ the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704603#action_12704603
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
BTW, I wonder if instead of "Quer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704600#action_12704600
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1518:
Let's not forget we also have "pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704597#action_12704597
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1518:
bq. Wrapping with CSQ is just adding anothe layer
R-trees are for spatial queries (two dimensions). If you want to have the
same for one-dimensional range queries, use TrieRangeQuery (see 2.9's
contrib queries package, this may move to core as a NumericRangeQuery etc.),
which is very stable and tested since years, but now to be included in
Lucene.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704594#action_12704594
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. Not in this issue though, rig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704590#action_12704590
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1536:
--
Interesting stuff!
Has anyone tested if this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704575#action_12704575
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1593:
bq. Another "things we should improve about the S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1593:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1593.patch
Patch includes:
# New scoresDocsInOrder to Query
#* Default to false
#
Hi,
Has anybody recently used lucene to implement R-trees for
range-queries. I came across the GeoLucene project but not sure how
stable/efficient it is to use it for production. Any pointers in this
direction will be great.
Thanks
-P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704566#action_12704566
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. Not sure what you mean by "testAndSet-like ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704561#action_12704561
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1518:
-
imo, it is really not all that important to make Filter
This was a false failure.
There's a timed test in contrib/benchmark that apparently can fail if
the machine happens to be swamped at the time.
I'll work out a more robust test.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Apache Hudson Server
wrote:
> See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704559#action_12704559
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1593:
Another "things we should improve
Hi
Recently I was involved in several issues that required some runtime changes
to be done in 3.0 and it was not so clear what is it that we're actually
allowed to do in 3.0. So I'd like to open it for discussion, unless
everybody agree on it already.
So far I can tell that 3.0 allows us to:
1) G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704556#action_12704556
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. Just to clarify for myself, i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704522#action_12704522
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
I think I understand what you mean, but please co
59 matches
Mail list logo
