[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: LUCENE-1692.txt
adds tests for thaianalyzer token offsets and types, both of which hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Sorry, last patch was invalid (did not compile), I forgot to to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1693.patch)
> AttributeSource/TokenStream API improvements
>
I've a web application which uses Lucene for search functionality. Lucene
search requests are served by web services sitting on 2 application servers
(IIS 7).The 2 application servers are Load balanced using "netscaler".
Both these servers have a batch job running which updates search indexes on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721078#action_12721078
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1595:
bq. I still want to run some tests with the wikip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721061#action_12721061
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1628:
-
Okay, fair enough. I figured you'd know better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721057#action_12721057
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1628:
-
mark: thanks for the followup on the licenses!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721054#action_12721054
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1696:
-
Patch looks good! I'll just hold off till the t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721052#action_12721052
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1599:
-
Well yuck.
SpanNearQuery does this clone call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721048#action_12721048
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1628:
-
Looks pretty good. Not sure if we should update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721044#action_12721044
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1628:
-
bq. mark, on the same topic: if possible, at so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1695:
Attachment: LUCENE-1695.patch
Pretty much done, all tests pass. It breaks back compat, but frankly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1595:
Attachment: LUCENE-1595.patch
Added to changes a bit
Removed modification to core Document class
u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721024#action_12721024
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1700:
--
Taking a step back, maybe we can solv
LogMergePolicy.findMergesToExpungeDeletes need to get deletes from the
SegmentReader
Key: LUCENE-1700
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1700
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch
The patch is cleaned up. A static variable IndexWriter.GLO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720984#action_12720984
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Go to bed, I'll review later... in meetings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Small updates, before I go to sleep. This patch removes the incr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720952#action_12720952
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
The second test does not work, because it a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720926#action_12720926
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Exactly: The problem is in SinkTokenizer. w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720919#action_12720919
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Btw: SinkTokenizer in my patch has a small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720913#action_12720913
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
You can probably fix CachingTokenFilter and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: TestCompatibility.java
Slightly changes tool yields on 2.4 and identically on trun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Here my solution: The three default methods are now optimized to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720887#action_12720887
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I'm not convinced yet that we will be able
Michael Busch wrote:
Everyone who is unhappy with the release TODO's, go back in your mail
archive to the 2.2 release and check how many tedious little changes
we made to improve the release quality. And besides the maven stuff,
there is not really more to do compared to pre-2.2, it's just
d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720854#action_12720854
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
bq. Should I wait to put in the Highlighter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720849#action_12720849
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1693:
-
Should I wait to put in the Highlighter update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720846#action_12720846
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I have a solution to build in some shortcut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith updated LUCENE-1625:
--
Attachment: CheckIndex.patch
Attached patch for exposing all collected stats
(created with svn diff >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720822#action_12720822
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I could change the calling chain:
increment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720820#action_12720820
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
Ah I understand the problem: As I t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720811#action_12720811
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Ah I understand the problem: As I told, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720809#action_12720809
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
The code is almost identical to before, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720794#action_12720794
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I'm looking at TokenStream.next():
{code:j
+1
Michael
On 6/17/09 10:32 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Michael Busch wrote:
We should just not put more items in the 2.9 list anymore (except bug
fixes of course) and then fix the 30 issues and don't rush them too
much. If it takes until end of July I think that's acceptable. A good
quality of
Michael Busch wrote:
We should just not put more items in the 2.9 list anymore (except bug
fixes of course) and then fix the 30 issues and don't rush them too
much. If it takes until end of July I think that's acceptable. A good
quality of the release should be highest priority in my opinion.
That means the release frequency should not exceed the new-committer
frequency. :)
On 6/17/09 10:09 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Michael Busch wrote:
One?!? I did 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2!
What can you do ... there was no new guy to relieve you :)
---
We should just not put more items in the 2.9 list anymore (except bug
fixes of course) and then fix the 30 issues and don't rush them too
much. If it takes until end of July I think that's acceptable. A good
quality of the release should be highest priority in my opinion.
Michael
On 6/17/09
Michael Busch wrote:
wanted to get 2.9 out really really soon.
really, really is probably not totally accurate. I just know how things
can get drawn out. Even still, we have 30 some issues to resolve. If we
don't make a drive though, when will 2.9 come out? Next fall at the
earliest? Later? S
Michael Busch wrote:
One?!? I did 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2!
What can you do ... there was no new guy to relieve you :)
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.
On 6/17/09 6:23 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
I have a special gift in not being clear.
I was just saying "be prepared, your turn is coming ;) "
But I havn't done a release myself - we don't release that often
despite discussion that we should release more often every year or so.
I did notice thoug
I'm happy to hear that :)
I suggested 2-3 weeks to prevent the schedule from being even tighter,
as it sounded like you guys wanted to get 2.9 out really really soon.
I'm really busy the rest of June and will have much more time for Lucene
in July. So if we could wait until end of July before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720696#action_12720696
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
michael, ok. I know additional tests here (agai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720692#action_12720692
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1693:
You can run tokenize.alg which invokes the ReadTo
Let's not forget Nutch... Also, for that matter, Mahout uses Lucene's
Analysis and Core (in fact, I just committed MAHOUT-126 which allows
one to create Vectors from a Lucene index!), although those are just
as consumers, I doubt there is a need for Mahout committers to change
Lucene.
O
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Grant
Ingersoll wrote:
On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
There are parts that aren't strictly part of the release process
IMO -
things like maven seem optional.
-1. Maven support is not op
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1673:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1673.patch
Here some intermediate update...
> Move TrieRange to core
> ---
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>> There are parts that aren't strictly part of the release process IMO -
>> things like maven seem optional.
>
> -1. Maven support is not optional.
I can't always follow Lucene closely, but
I agree.
I'm picturing some hopefully-not-that-distant future when we have a
queries "module" and analysis "module" that live quite separately from
Lucene & Solr's "core", and committers from both Solr and Lucene would
work on it.
Mike
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720676#action_12720676
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Hi Michael,
I did not do any performance te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1630:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1630.patch
* Collector's acceptDocsOutOfOrder is abstract - this was a really goo
I have a special gift in not being clear.
I was just saying "be prepared, your turn is coming ;) "
But I havn't done a release myself - we don't release that often despite
discussion that we should release more often every year or so.
I did notice though, that Mike did the release right after
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
More questions:
1. What about Highlighter and MoreLikeThis? They have not been
converted. Also, what are they going to do if the attributes they
need are not available? Caveat emptor?
2. Same for TermVectors. What if the user specif
> Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Maybe Mark helps me and I can do
> > it alone the next time, if I have to? :-)
> >
> Tag team effort ? It will be my first release to, so that would be great !
Ah ok, I interpreted your mail different yesterday (but it was 1 or 2 am in
Germany...).
Uwe
--
On Jun 17, 2009, at 4:42 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I would love to see function queries consolidated between Solr and
Lucene! I think it's a prime example of duplicated and then diverged
sources between Lucene and Solr...
The primary reason it's diverged is it gets a lot of attention on
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Mark Miller
> > wrote:
> > There are parts that aren't strictly part of the release process IMO -
> > things like maven seem optional.
>
> -1. Maven support is not optional.
>
> +1 for more automation. Fo
Uwe Schindler wrote:
Maybe Mark helps me and I can do
it alone the next time, if I have to? :-)
Tag team effort ? It will be my first release to, so that would be great !
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
To
On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Mark Miller
wrote:
There are parts that aren't strictly part of the release process IMO -
things like maven seem optional.
-1. Maven support is not optional.
+1 for more automation. For the record, once set
I tend also to a little bit later; maybe we need more discussions about
NumericField and NumericSortField, especially between the two fractions Mike
vs. Yonik :-)
After finishing the TokenStream simplification and optimization, I will now
again start rewriting of javadocs for trie and hopefully I
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> How soon is soon? Code freeze in 2-3 weeks or so maybe? Then 7-10 days
> testing, so 2.9 should be out mid July? Sounds reasonable?
This schedule might be tight for me... I'm "on vacation" for the week
starting Jun 29. Hopefully I can most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1693.patch)
> AttributeSource/TokenStream API improvements
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Sorry, small bug in cloning inside next(): the POSToken-test was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Attached is a new patch, that implements the last idea:
- There
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720632#action_12720632
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
{quote}
You forgot to fill in the "?" in CHAN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720629#action_12720629
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
bq. You forgot to fill in the "?" in CHANGES
I g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720622#action_12720622
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
It isn't and that's what I expressed in the javad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720623#action_12720623
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
Still working through the patch..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720619#action_12720619
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1630:
-
I wasn't following the issue closely, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720612#action_12720612
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
Ok I will change acceptsDocsOutOfOrder on Collect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720607#action_12720607
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
{quote}
bq. Can we make Collector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720593#action_12720593
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1673:
bq. Want a convenience method for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720578#action_12720578
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1699:
Patch looks good:
* Can you m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720574#action_12720574
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1673:
Note that LUCENE-1505 is open for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720572#action_12720572
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1505:
LUCENE-1496 is "won't fix" becaus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1505:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Summary: Change contrib/spatial to use trie's NumericUti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720570#action_12720570
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1692:
Robert, you should probably also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720571#action_12720571
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
I am working on that, I have a meet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720569#action_12720569
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1516:
{quote}
Currently we check the in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720568#action_12720568
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
bq. I think you should try it out and see i
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> I would love to see function queries consolidated between Solr and
> Lucene! I think it's a prime example of duplicated and then diverged
> sources between Lucene and Solr...
>
> And it's fabulous that you are "volunteering", Simon ;)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720562#action_12720562
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
For caching:
I guess you would have to impl
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> I've looked at the release todo wiki and I am still having nightmares.
>
> Indeed - it's gotten 5 times longer since the last time I did Lucene or Solr.
> There are parts that aren't strict
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> Cool, seems like Mark is volunteering to be the 2.9 release manager ;)
Yay!
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
I would love to see function queries consolidated between Solr and
Lucene! I think it's a prime example of duplicated and then diverged
sources between Lucene and Solr...
And it's fabulous that you are "volunteering", Simon ;) We have
precious few volunteers that stride both communities well eno
I think readahead would be less interesting to Lucene; while we
definitely want a certain amount of readahead (to "amortize" the
seeking), too much readahead starts means evicting things from the IO
cache. OSs already do a fair job (I think) of some amount of
readahead, though if we do gain posix_
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Yonik
Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Simon
> Willnauer wrote:
>> I was thinking of adding a patch for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1085
>
> That's *way* too big of an issue and it breaks back compat in Solr (to
> change from Sol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720550#action_12720550
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
OK, I have a solution:
I write a wrapper cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1630:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1630.patch
Fixed most of your comments Mike. I also noticed I did not document
C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720538#action_12720538
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
OK, what about this sentence in Token.java:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720534#action_12720534
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Hi Michael,
in principle your test is inval
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720534#action_12720534
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1693 at 6/17/09 12:39 AM:
---
On 6/15/09 10:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
But, as Michael M reminded me, it is complex, so please accept my
apologies.
No worries, Grant! I was not really offended, but rather confused...
Thanks for clarifying.
Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720530#action_12720530
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
But I'll definitely buy Uwe a beer if he co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720529#action_12720529
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I don't think we mention subclassing of Tok
95 matches
Mail list logo
