[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790586#action_12790586
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. I would like to know how the paper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790506#action_12790506
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-2120:
---
Hi Michael:
bq: Why does Zoie even retain 3 reader
<<>>
Agree absolutely. I was just making sure we considered
the *possibility* that the paramaterized version was showing
an underlying Lucene problem rather than assuming the
fault was with Junit4. Having spent a way too much of
my programming life being absolutely sure I knew what
part of the sys
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790392#action_12790392
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
thanks for the pointer Earwin, its very useful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790391#action_12790391
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. couldn't we pull a Term(s)Enum fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790373#action_12790373
]
David Kaelbling edited comment on LUCENE-2039 at 12/14/09 9:17 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790373#action_12790373
]
David Kaelbling commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
{bq}
I do not see another way than pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790369#action_12790369
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Make that... eliminate the *dead*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790368#action_12790368
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. If you do take hold of it, do not hesitate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790366#action_12790366
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Hmm good question. Actually, cou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790360#action_12790360
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2156:
--
ensureOpen() is to help catch coding mistakes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2157:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2157.patch
Now an even optimized IdentityEncode for payloads. It uses ByteB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790358#action_12790358
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. by the way, the only open impl of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790354#action_12790354
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2156:
-
bq. ensureOpen is only on a "best effor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2156:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2156.patch
New patch.
> use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track IR.re
Thanks for letting me know, it's quite a relief to be able to trust the
@Parameterized
stuff.
Just let me know if you need me to regenerate the patch whenever you want to
apply it. Between now and then I'll find something else to do ...
Erick
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790329#action_12790329
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2156:
You're right! AtomicBoolean is o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790321#action_12790321
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
David, I assume you use a subclass of Q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790314#action_12790314
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2156:
-
Did I miss you exploiting 'atomicity' o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2156:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2156.patch
> use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track IR.refCount and I
yeah i am convinced this is not a problem with your junit 4 patch Erick...
as Uwe ran into the same trouble I ran into with the existing
LocalizedTestCase
however, if you don't mind, I'd like to let it set with the junit 3 impl a
little bit longer and see if we get more random-hard-to-reproduce fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790284#action_12790284
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. Can't we just merge-sort into the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2157:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2157.patch
> DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter copies the bufer over itsself. Ins
Oooh, nice...
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM, wrote:
> Author: rmuir
> Date: Mon Dec 14 18:26:26 2009
> New Revision: 890427
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=890427&view=rev
> Log:
> LUCENE-2155: add assertion to check if something changes default locale
> behind our back when using Lo
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter copies the bufer over itsself. Instead it should
only set the length. Also optimize logic.
--
Key: LUCENE-2157
URL: htt
use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track IR.refCount and IW.closed
Key: LUCENE-2156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790270#action_12790270
]
David Kaelbling commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
Hi Simon -- sorry, an example using a f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790260#action_12790260
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2120:
Jake/John, how can I run the Zoie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790251#action_12790251
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2155:
-
Committed revision 890407.
This may not be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2155.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> random localization test failures
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790233#action_12790233
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2039 at 12/14/09 4:49 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790233#action_12790233
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
Am I missing something? Why not using t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790223#action_12790223
]
David Kaelbling commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
> David here is an example of what I me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2155:
Attachment: LUCENE-2155.patch
attached is a patch that not only clears all Calendar attributes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2155:
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Assignee: Robert Muir
> random localization test failures
> --
random localization test failures
-
Key: LUCENE-2155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
Priority: Minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2140.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Committed revis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2143:
---
Attachment: SearchTest.java
So, good news / bad news...
The good news is I got a mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2104:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2104.patch
Changed NativeFSLock.release() to first obtain and then release the lo
I think so. This is likely the hard-to-reproduce problem I have been finding
testing Erick's junit4 patch for localization.
I think there is something wierd with the test itself, and has nothing to do
with junit 3 or 4...
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Strange now it w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2146.
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has
Strange now it works, it seems to be a random failure. Does actual time has
anything to do with this test?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
_
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Monday, December 14
I get the following Test failure with Java 1.5.0_22 of Slowlaris:
[junit] - Standard Output ---
[junit] Test failure of 'testLegacyDateRange' occurred under a different
Locale th_TH
[junit] Test failure of 'testDateRange' occurred under a different
Locale t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790107#action_12790107
]
wang commented on LUCENE-2146:
--
Thanks Michael and Uwe.
i understand it is not a bug.
> Dis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790084#action_12790084
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2140:
---
I will commit this patch later today.
> To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790069#action_12790069
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2146:
---
And the patch is against 2.9 without generi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790063#action_12790063
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2146:
Actually... it's this a mis-use o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790057#action_12790057
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Can't we just merge-sort into the
48 matches
Mail list logo
