I now realize WinZip 8.1 is rather old - seems that 9.0 was available in
2004 - so unless there is any other complaint on this I am okay with
considering this one a non-issue.
Just to clear any doubt about the 2.2 zip files:
from the 'WinZip support' response:
The particular report you
Doron Cohen wrote:
Just to clear any doubt about the 2.2 zip files:
from the 'WinZip support' response:
The particular report you sent is almost never reproducible
after a machine restart. Can you reproduce the problem
after restarting your machine?
And indeed after restart the
Found three issues:
(1) Zip files fail to open with my WinZip.
(2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars.
(3) Empty lucene-similarity jar in the bin distribution.
More details below, but bottom line, (1) might be just my
problem (?), for (2) it might be ok for those external
jars not to have
OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) on Win XP Pro and was able to
unzip both src binary without any errors. I also tested Stuffit on
Mac OS X, WinRAR on Windows 2003 Server and the unzip command-line
Linux utility without any issues.
Mike
Doron Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) ...
Typo? Latest Winzip version is 11.1.
Doron Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found three issues:
(1) Zip files fail to open with my WinZip.
(2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars.
(3) Empty lucene-similarity jar
Wps! Yes, a typo.
Mike
Steven Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) ...
Typo? Latest Winzip version is 11.1.
Doron Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found three issues:
(1) Zip files fail to open with my WinZip.
(2)
Doron Cohen wrote:
(2) No meta-inf/license in some external jars.
Well I'm not a lawyer either, but since these are 3rd party jars we
can't change that,
right?
(3) Empty lucene-similarity jar in the bin distribution.
The similarity package is still in the trunk for future
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I tested using the latest Winzip (1.11) on Win XP Pro and was able to
unzip both src binary without any errors. I also tested Stuffit on
Mac OS X, WinRAR on Windows 2003 Server and the unzip command-line
Linux utility without any issues.
That's good.
Never
On 6/17/07, Michael Busch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at
http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene-2.2.0/ as Lucene 2.2.
+1
Great job guys!
-Yonik
-
+1 Thanks for taking the lead on this Michael. I hate to ask you to
do more when you already have done so much, but, If you have the
time, can you do a post-mortem to make sure the release checklist is
up to date on the Wiki with all the things you did, esp. the Maven
stuff. Let me know
Looks good to me. +1
Doug
Michael Busch wrote:
I just finished building the release candidate from the current 2.2
branch (rev. 548010)
Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at
http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene-2.2.0/ as Lucene 2.2.
A minimum
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
+1 Thanks for taking the lead on this Michael. I hate to ask you to
do more when you already have done so much, but, If you have the time,
can you do a post-mortem to make sure the release checklist is up to
date on the Wiki with all the things you did, esp. the Maven
I just finished building the release candidate from the current 2.2
branch (rev. 548010)
Please vote to officially release the release artifacts located at
http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene-2.2.0/ as Lucene 2.2.
A minimum of three binding votes (i. e. from Lucene PMC
13 matches
Mail list logo
