Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/sta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

OK I've generated them manually, and I'll go open an issue to do some ant magic :) Mike On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I ran into the same thing - its supposed to, but it no longer seems to. > > We are doing a hack do to some issue that appears to be resolved in ant > - I t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

I ran into the same thing - its supposed to, but it no longer seems to. We are doing a hack do to some issue that appears to be resolved in ant - I think we can switch it to just use the hash task. Michael McCandless wrote: > Eek, I don't know! For some reason "ant dist" didn't generate them. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

Eek, I don't know! For some reason "ant dist" didn't generate them. I'll dig & post them. Mike On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts? > > On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> OK, let's try this again!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

Where are the MD5 hashes of the top level artifacts? On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ Changes ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 30 okt 2009 kl. 00.27 skrev Michael McCandless: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 Tested (via solr 1.4.0 RC) and everything seems good On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > OK, let's try this again! > > I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 > branch), here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ > > Changes are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 Michael On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 my chinese corpus indexed fine this time :) On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > OK, let's try this again! > > I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 > branch), here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/sta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 3

+1 On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: OK, let's try this again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

ay and reopened >>>>> LUCENE-2002. >>>>> >>>>> So I changed my mind: -1 :( >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>>>> http://www.th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

http://www.thetaphi.de >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM >>&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

;> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> >> >>> -Original Message

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >> http://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message- > >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesday

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

r >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>> http://www.thetaphi.de >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message- >>>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

; - >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

t;> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2 >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless < >> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

il.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2 > > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

+1 On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/ > > Changes are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging- > area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

+1 Grant Ingersoll wrote: > +1 > > On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) >> from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/ >> >> Change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2

+1 On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback) from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemcc

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Looks good. One thing: > >> > >> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev > in the > >> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: >> Looks good. One thing: >> >> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the >> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Looks good. One thing: > > In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the > version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having > -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles h

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1

Looks good. One thing: In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because