Hello!!! God Bless You!!

1999-02-12 Thread sdasd sadasd
http://www.lanzadera.com/caricaturas http://dinero.homepage.nu __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Re: Porting JDK1.1.7 to Linux

1999-02-12 Thread Jim Watson
It is caused by a empty line at the end of the source for appletviewer! this causes a "\" to appear in the diff file. my versions of patch\diff get upset by this. in which case it has to be removed from the diff file by hand in order to get things working. > >>>I can not tell why this would hap

Re: will there be a jdk 2.x??

1999-02-12 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it is just a myth that they are working on 1.2... soon it will turn into legend. ;P --jason On 12-Feb-99 Matt Welsh wrote: > > I think it would be a terrific idea for the Blackdown web page to have > a note explaining the progress of JDK 1.2 (as in "don't ask"). If I get > one more me

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
Nelson Minar wrote: > > > With 1.1.7, Linux is either the best or second best Unix platform for > running Java. Solaris is obviously alright, but most of the other Java > ports (SGI, Digital Unix, etc) have really bad problems. Yes, the SGI port is really broken (especially the jit) > Another

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Tony Pujals
At 06:09 PM 2/12/99 +, you wrote: >Am I the only person on this list who *doesn't* want to help finish the port? >:-) Nope, me neither! There aren't enough hours in the day or enough days in the week. . . . My hat's off to the guys who are doing it, though -- they deserve a lot of credit! T

Re: will there be a jdk 2.x??

1999-02-12 Thread Matt Welsh
I think it would be a terrific idea for the Blackdown web page to have a note explaining the progress of JDK 1.2 (as in "don't ask"). If I get one more message on this list about JDK 1.2 I'm going to explode! mdw Chris Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There used to be a note that jdk1.2

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Nathan Meyers
> On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 10:49:30AM -0500, Nelson Minar wrote: > > >Perhaps when the dust settles from the 1.2 port, it might be possible > > >to arrange more formal and detailed visibility into what work is > > >being done, what's under consideration, what's of interest, and progress. > > I'd li

Re: Keyboard mnemonic problem

1999-02-12 Thread Christopher Smith
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Whenever I start Motif applications on my linux box the [RETURN] does not > work, but strangely enough Control-J work. I basically have given up. > > Does XBD (X keyboard extension) cure this problem ? > How can I see XBD ? This sounds like it might

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Kelly Campbell
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 12:14:43PM -0500, Matthew Hunter wrote: > > I've been paying attention to this as well, and (unfortunately) I > haven't been able to find anything more specific than press releases > about semi-open-source JDK development on Sun's site. I'd like to help > with the port to

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Matthew Hunter
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 10:49:30AM -0500, Nelson Minar wrote: > >Perhaps when the dust settles from the 1.2 port, it might be possible > >to arrange more formal and detailed visibility into what work is > >being done, what's under consideration, what's of interest, and progress. > I'd like to see

Re: Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Tony Pujals
I have to admit feeling excited but anxious about the 1.2 port. I'm forced to do my development under Windows right now because 1.2 isn't yet available for Linux. The lack of visibility on the porting process makes it easy to forget that the people doing the port are working very hard and not get

will there be a jdk 2.x??

1999-02-12 Thread Chris Tomlinson
There used to be a note that jdk1.2/2.0 was 'in progress' now that is no longer there. What is the status for jdk 2.0 for linux?? Thanks and ciao, Christine Tomlinson

Improving Java/Linux support

1999-02-12 Thread Nelson Minar
>Judging from the volume of "when will 1.2 be ready?" messages, it's >clear that interest in the Blackdown work is reaching some sort of >critical mass. With 1.1.7, Linux is either the best or second best Unix platform for running Java. Solaris is obviously alright, but most of the other Java por

Re: Keyboard mnemonic problem

1999-02-12 Thread peter . pilgrim
Whenever I start Motif applications on my linux box the [RETURN] does not work, but strangely enough Control-J work. I basically have given up. Does XBD (X keyboard extension) cure this problem ? How can I see XBD ? Peter __ Reply Separator

jre

1999-02-12 Thread alexander lang
If anyone is listening... I am having trouble getting my application to run with the jre. When I try the jre under the bin directory nothing happens. Here is a portion of my script: jre=../usr/local/ PATH=$jre/bin/:PATH . . . export CLASSPATH=.:$jre/lib/i18n.jar:$jre/lib/rt.jar (LD_LIBRARY_

?

1999-02-12 Thread Topi Maenpaa
I have been desperately waiting for the JDK 1.2 release and checked your web page daily. In december it was said that you are ready to release in less than month... Today I could not see any information considering JDK 1.2... What has happened to it? Regards, Topi Mäenpää << http://ee.oulu.fi/~t

Remote javac/javah compiler?

1999-02-12 Thread Rob Schoening
Hi- Over on the BeOS porting project we're trying to devise a way to build the JDK without a java runtime to run javac or javah. While we can use jikes to replace javac, javah is a bit more difficult. My current idea is replace the javah classloader so that it can load the classes over the

Re: javax packages

1999-02-12 Thread Nathan Meyers
Raju Karia wrote: > > Does Sun's committment to support the porting of Java to Linux include > packages outside the JDK 1.2 Core API ? Obviously, pure Java packages > will run on the JDK 1.2 port (some already run on JDK 1.1). > I'm interested in seeing ports to Linux of packages that depend on s