Marc Jauvin writes:
> Is the bug also present in kernel 2.2.0 and up?
No, 2.2.0 has a correct implementation (at least the code looks correct to
me -- I still need to verify it).
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
hi steve,
where can i get the linux patch for the jdk 1.1.7/6 ? the link from your site
http://shell.ncm.com/~sbb/1.1.6/v2/jdk1.1.6.diffs.gz seems to be broken
i did try searching the web, but came up with only some older diffs.
thanx
ajay
--
David Harvill wrote:
> The article is about the Blackdown project, not a different one.
Yes it was, and it made a strong statement about availability without bothering
to check a reliable source. Sort of puts all of those Clinton impeachment news
stories into perspective, doesn't it :-)?
Nathan
The article is about the Blackdown project, not a different one.
-dave
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Christopher Rowan wrote:
> I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves.
>
> Don't let 'em steal your thunder!
>
> Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > Tom McMichael writes:
> > > http://abcnews
Stewart Allen wrote:
> It would seem from the 1.2 status page that 1.2 is fully functional
> except on 2.0.xx linux kernels. Is this correct? Do we have to wait
> for a kernel patch to get 1.2 or can it be released with the caveat
> that it requires a 2.2.x kernel?
>
> -stewart
It would be nice
On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 11:08:52 -0700, Freemon Johnson wrote:
>Java Port Team,
>
>Will this version of JAVA run properly on RedHat Version 4.2 which is
>running 2.0.33 version of the linux kernel? Thanks alot. If not which
>port of Java can I run I am looking for at least 1.1 or later.
The JDK 1.1.
I'm new to this list (been lurking for awhile though)...I first want to send
my thanks to all at Blackdown for doing a great job; you are helping further
the cause of Linux and Java and it is much appreciated.
Now for my question...
I installed the latest release version (1.1.7v1a) on a Linux 2.
Java Port Team,
Will this version of JAVA run properly on RedHat Version 4.2 which is
running 2.0.33 version of the linux kernel? Thanks alot. If not which
port of Java can I run I am looking for at least 1.1 or later.
Regards,
Freemon
--
Freemon Johnson
Systems Engineer
Motorola SSTG
Advanced
It would seem from the 1.2 status page that 1.2 is fully functional
except on 2.0.xx linux kernels. Is this correct? Do we have to wait
for a kernel patch to get 1.2 or can it be released with the caveat
that it requires a 2.2.x kernel?
-stewart
---
Is the bug also present in kernel 2.2.0 and up?
-- marc
Half of the people in the world are below average.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please stop to send me mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://my.netian.com/~gowin
vivian hsu nude photo
-¿øº» ¸Þ½ÃÁö-
º¸³½ »ç¶÷: blaise toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
¹Þ´Â »ç¶÷: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
³¯Â¥: 1999³â 3¿ù 2ÀÏ È¿äÀÏ ¿ÀÀü 6:06
Á¦¸ñ: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: ejboss, an ejb application server for linux]
>
>huh... this really BEL
I am preparing a magazine article on Java for Linux. It will probably
appear May/June, and will cover JDK 1.2 for Linux. I have spoken
several
times with Anand Palaniswamy about the 1.2 port, and have the Feb 22
build running on my Linux laptop (RedHat 5.1).
I'd like to talk with you within the
I just read on http://www.linux.org.uk/diary/ that kernel 2.0.37 should
be released within a week. Does anyone know if this kernel still has the
socket multicast issue that's holding up the port? If it does, now might
be a good time to suggest it to the kernel folks...
If it doesn't, though, it m
Hello
I search a C development environnement write in Java for running in any
platform.
In preference a graphic environnement.
Thanks
Irfan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
i Guess ur soul is ok
Christopher Rowan wrote:
> I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves.
>
> Don't let 'em steal your thunder!
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves.
Don't let 'em steal your thunder!
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Tom McMichael writes:
> > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_javalinux990301.html
> >
> > According to this article sun says that the 1.2 linux port will be done
17 matches
Mail list logo
