Re: jdk1.1.6 (sparc) dumping core

1999-01-18 Thread Java News-collector
You may have had Kaffe installed which resulted in the library complaint. Do a "which java" to see if you are running Kaffe (it will be /usr/bin/java rather than /usr/local/jdk...). Uninstall Kaffe and uninstall libc5 if this is true. That should get you running. Caveate: I'm running Redhat on

Re: Sorry: Ignore that last post (Is this a JVM bug? Why is my local variable not initialized?)

1999-01-07 Thread Java News-collector
Obviously you have limited knowledge/experience with the internals of object-oriented environments. I wouldn't be too quick to call the object construction/initialization sequence "dumb" without a detailed analysis. I would be inclined to say that calling an abstract/virtual method that must be

Re: backtab

1999-01-06 Thread Java News-collector
There was a previous post on this; reference "http://www.oakstrsft.com/~javanews/msg0110.htm" On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Rob Nugent wrote: > I just noticed on jdk117_v1a that I no longer appear to be getting a > keyPressed > KeyEvent for backtab i.e. shift+tab. I get the event for the shift key > on it

Re: Problem on mSQL.

1999-01-03 Thread Java News-collector
This sounds like your DNS is returning a different name for your machine (when the IP is used to do a reverse lookup) than your machine claims to be. Otherwise, mSQL may be setup to use identd to verify the user (I haven't setup mSQL so I am not sure of its authentication scheme), in this case, y

Re: has anyone got the native threads jdk1.1.7a1 running?

1998-12-16 Thread Java News Collector
At 05:00 PM 12/16/98 -0600, Moses DeJong wrote: >I have not seen much about the native threads port for 1.1.7 in the >mailing list archives. Is there anyone out there that has gotten the >native threads version of 1.1.7a1 to work with JNI? I have an application >that compiles and works on Solaris,

Re: list/mail

1998-12-16 Thread Java News Collector
just send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] put "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message. At 01:25 PM 12/16/98 -0500, Miguell Morillas wrote: >Miguell Morillas wrote: >> >> > I don't want to receive any more mail.What can I do to unsubscribe from >> this list? >> >> MIGUEL >

Re: JDBC-connection in Linux

1998-12-13 Thread Java News Collector
At 07:38 PM 12/12/98 -0500, Leo Cyr wrote: >I too have had great success with postgresql (www.postgresql.org ;-) -- >I've used the driver and code I wrote on many platforms including 4.x+ >browsers and it works great so far. > >Is anyone using postgreSQL (6.3.2 or other) with postgresql.jar in any

RE: JDBC-connection in Linux

1998-12-13 Thread Java News Collector
At 02:17 AM 12/12/98 -0800, Tauren Mills wrote: >I'd highly recommend taking a look at MySQL. www.mysql.com > >I'm using RedHat 5.2, JRun 2.2.1, and MySQL with type 4 JDBC drivers. The >database and JDBC drivers are free. The database is faster than anything >else I've seen, including the big o

Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

1998-12-07 Thread Java News Collector
At 10:21 AM 12/7/98 -0800, David Wall wrote: >>What is the idea of Java? Portable code. > >If that's all they claim, they will lose, since portable code has existed >long before their patent. Now, portable code inside web browser may be >different, though some might argue that HTML itself is code

Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

1998-12-07 Thread Java News Collector
At 12:06 PM 12/7/98 -0600, Justin Lee wrote: >Ernst de Haan wrote: --- snip --- >Yet, surely the concept of portable code can't be contained within that patent. >Portable, interpreted code has been around far longer than that patent. For an >example, pick any form of BASIC. Isn't Java just anothe

Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

1998-12-07 Thread Java News Collector
At 01:07 PM 12/7/98 +0100, you wrote: >Found a link to this article on JavaLobby: > > http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit19981203.html > >Could turn out bad. Very bad. > I read the abstract of this patent. I'm going to order a copy of the full patent because, IMHO, the patent abstract doe

Re: Servlet program compile error

1998-12-04 Thread Java News Collector
It would appear from the stack-trace you provided that your servlet is never executing. Its probably not even being loaded. The exception ... >Failed to locate native function: >java/util/zip/Inflater.init(Z)V >java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError >at java/util/zip/ZipFile.getInputStream(line unknown

for the record

1998-12-01 Thread Java News Collector
To all the good people who are working hard to grow java on linux; I, for one, appreciate your efforts. In my opinion, you are underpaid! This recent barrage of criticism from new subscribers and wall flowers is completely baseless. We need to make everyone aware that there is a 100% money-bac

Re: java runtime object invoke a linux interavtive command

1998-11-27 Thread Java News Collector
At 04:58 PM 11/26/98 +0800, optima wrote: >hellow friend >I can use the runtime object to exec() a "ls". >But I can't invoke the command "passwd " >because it need to comfirm the passwd .how can I do >thank my linux fan. If you aren't using shadow passwords, you can just locate the password in t

Re: java

1998-11-06 Thread Java News Collector
Also, make sure you are running what you think you are running. Do a "which java" and make sure you don't have a conflicting package like Kaffe or older version of Java. At 10:25 AM 11/6/98 -0500, Aleksey Sudakov wrote: >: I am running the lates glibc version of jdk on a Pentium66 with linux 5.0.

Re: Open Java

1998-11-04 Thread Java News Collector
At 11:44 PM 11/4/98 -0500, Nelson Minar wrote: >I'd really hate to see this list get dragged into a debate about >Java Linux porting team politics. The folks who have donated their >effort to bringing Java to Linux - all of them - have done a wonderful >job. Thanks to you all! Agreed. --- big s

Re: Interest in a JIT on Linux

1998-11-02 Thread Java News Collector
At 03:40 PM 11/2/98 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> user who happens to work for IBM in the Research division, I've been wondering >> if some of the technology we have here could be useful to the Java on Linux >> effort. More specifically, I was thinking that I might be able to get a >> "resea

Re: Off-topic issues

1998-10-29 Thread Java News Collector
How about this; Its not Ok to post off-topic to any newsgroup. --- or --- Those of us who get tired of filtering it manually just unsubscribe and let this list go the way so many have before it. I'm sure the hardest working, most dedicated people will be the first to go. There are some things

Re: newbie question

1998-10-29 Thread Java News Collector
At 11:47 AM 10/29/98 -0700, you wrote: >Hi all, >I just installed the glibc verison of the blackdown JDK 1.1.6 and I am >getting this error when trying to complile a simple program using javac. > >/usr/local/jdk116_v5/bin/../bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading >shared libraries >libXpm.s

Re: Graphics Blaster Extreeme

1998-10-27 Thread Java News Collector
What has this got to do with Java on Linux ? At 02:52 PM 10/23/98 -0500, Bryan Davis wrote: >I havent gotten my Diamond G460 i740 card to work with X yet. So i put in >my Graphics Blaster Extreeme 8 meg card and got a server from SusE site and >it seems to be working fine but its very slow it se

Re: Is there a decent file explorer for Linux?

1998-10-25 Thread Java News Collector
At 03:23 AM 10/26/98 -, Chi-Ming Yang wrote: >Hi there, > Is there a decent file explorer (manager) for Linux? > I installed Red Hat 5.1. It comes with two file manager utilities, xtm and mid-night command. I am new to Linux. I really have problem to get use to it. > I think it is not di

Re: Problem compiling with the JDK

1998-10-23 Thread Java News Collector
At 04:41 PM 10/22/98 -0500, Andrew P. Karels wrote: >I am having problems useing the javac compiler in the Blackdown JDK. >When I just type "javac" I get the message "No library path set". I >have RedHat linux ver. 5.1 JDK version 1.1.6.v5 glibc. > >Thanks for any help you can provide. > >Andy K.

Re: nusty linux exception

1998-10-23 Thread Java News Collector
At 01:50 PM 10/23/98 +0300, Pinca George wrote: >hello world, > >I made a program useing symantec's classes.zip. > >It works fine on windows bat when I move it to Linux I get a nusty >NullPointerException exception on the line : > > >searchButton.setImageURL(symantec.itools.net.RelativeURL.getURL(

Re: jdk 1.1.x without X-windows support

1998-10-22 Thread Java News Collector
It has been written previously so I quote; >It is a bit hidden - it is in the README.linux file under the NS_JAVA >option. :-) > >If you set that environment variable, the non-statically linked non-AWT >JVM will be used. > At 12:10 PM 10/22/98 +0200, Michal Fadljevic wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I h

Re: lifeless javac with RedHat 5.0 JDK1.1.6v5

1998-10-15 Thread Java News Collector
Jason, Your path may still be the problem. Un*x doesn't search the current directory unless the path contains a "." and, if the path does contain a ".", the current directory will be searched after any directories that precede that "." in the path. It sounds like you may be executing a differen

Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

1998-10-15 Thread Java News Collector
Andrew, I'd like to say, in the nicest way possible, your java installation isn't using the correct libraries. Either you have a mixed set of libraries or some mixed java code. I would suggest removing previous versions of java that may use the old libc5 libraries, making sure you have a clean

RE: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Java News Collector
At 01:14 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote: >Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the >a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the >thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as >someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I ha

Re: JIT ????

1998-10-06 Thread Java News Collector
At 05:59 PM 10/6/98 -0400, Mehrdad Jahansoozi wrote: >Greetings, > >Apparently, There is a confusion between JIT compiler, and JIT virtual >machine( VM ). And this isn't helping. The JIT is not the Java compiler. It is the "just in time" compiler which is also platform-specific and actually proc

Re: Problem installing JDK

1998-10-05 Thread Java News Collector
It sounds to me like you FTP'd the file in ASCII mode rather than IMAGE (binary) mode! You have a corrupted tar file. At 08:46 AM 10/5/98 -0500, Bordelon wrote: >I am fairly new to the Unix (esp. Linux) world. I am trying to set up a small Linux server for my client in an effort to demonstrate

Re: Does Java apps has to have .class extension?

1998-10-05 Thread Java News Collector
At 08:19 PM 10/5/98 -0400, Danny Lu wrote: >But when I try to run a example program I wrote.. and I change >the extension.. I got an error stating "Can't find class Example" > >okay at first I tried to compile my example program: > javac Example.java > >and I got Example.class... now I chang

Re: Netscape 4.05 support Java 1.1??

1998-10-05 Thread Java News Collector
At 04:58 AM 10/5/98 -, Chi-Ming Yang wrote: >Thanks Juergen, Mario, Dan, Dimitrios, and John. >Is there a RPM for the latest Netscape? (4.06?) >Why did Red Hat 5.1 give me an old Netscape? >It seems that Netscape is not taking Java seriously. Too bad. Netscape is taking Java very seriously.

Re: slightly off-topic

1998-10-03 Thread Java News Collector
You're right, you are missing something pretty basic. If you have a method that must return type Object or any less specific class than the class you KNOW it to be, you use an explicit cast when referring to the returned reference. The Java runtime will issue a run-time error if you make an ille

Re: Can't import Calender in java.util.Calender

1998-10-01 Thread Java News Collector
At 02:23 PM 10/1/98 -0500, you wrote: >I recently tried to write a program trying import Calender so that I >could use it and I got the Error: Class java.util.Calender not found in >import. I have my classpath set to include my classes.zip and my >swingall.jar and it has worked find on all the ot

Re: java crashes when starting a frame (more info)

1998-10-01 Thread Java News Collector
At 08:21 PM 10/1/98 +0200, you wrote: >Hi again! > >I left out some information that might help in solving of my question. >An output like this one is printed > >The output when it crashes (java and appletviewer). > >SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation >stackbase=0xbf

Re: strange problem with jdk1.1.6v4 and debian....

1998-10-01 Thread Java News Collector
At 11:48 AM 10/1/98 -0700, you wrote: >Hello, > >spurious thing >i am developping several things, and since now had no problem executing them... >but now i ran into the following problem: > >i have a class HelpBrowser that i began to make with netbeans, this class >includes a method >public