Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of
>RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing
>ANYTHING about an RC1.
> >
> > But anywa
Yes. I get the same Illegal instruction error on a Pentium MMX 233
running Debian potato (refreshed last night), glibc-2.1.2.
-Peter
Paul Bowman wrote:
>
> The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native
> code
> which is dependent on a Pentium II or newer processor.
>
>
Hallo Jan,
I'm running an AMD K6-3 400... do egcs (or gcc, whichever was used to compile
the JDK) support Pentium-specific operations (as opposed to pentium-specific
optimizations)?
JB>I tried to run it on a AMD K6-2 450 and it didn't even start up because
JB>of the same error. Maybe, as you sa
Hallo Nathan,
NM>It's clear that the actual bugs prevent the JDK from being fully
NM>supported on the guilty glibc versions (as well they should), but
NM>having some way to
I just want to point at the fact that the actual bug mentioned by me
("Internal error") happens on a current *Debian pot
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 02:43:17PM -0800, Paul Bowman wrote:
> The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native
> code
> which is dependent on a Pentium II or newer processor.
>
> The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release runs out of the box on a Pentium II - 266Mhz
> processor
> using Slackwa
The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native
code
which is dependent on a Pentium II or newer processor.
The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release runs out of the box on a Pentium II - 266Mhz
processor
using Slackware 7, which is based on glibc-2.1.2.
Trying the same JDK release on a mach
I got mine last night from ftp.tux.org
John Louis wrote:
> Hi,
> I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell
>me where to download.
> I download rc1 from this address:
> ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/
>
> John
>
nham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jan Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!
> >
> >Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ekkehard,
> >>
> >> I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstea
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 07:50:31PM -, John Louis wrote:
> Hi,
> I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell
>me where to download.
> I download rc1 from this address:
> ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/
Look at the mirrosites at
Jan Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!
>
>Jan Buchmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ekkehard,
>>
>> I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported
>glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your box
Hi,
I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell me
where to download.
I download rc1 from this address:
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/
John
ôèPÔ
ÿzf¢Ú#jöÿ)îÇúު笷øÚ½¯
86)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: Jan Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!
Jan Buchmann wrote:
>
> Hi Ekkehard,
>
> I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported
>glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your bo
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of
>RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing
>ANYTHING about an RC1.
>
> But anyway, you might try RC1 since i
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 11:26:49 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
>Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of
>RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing
>ANYTHING about an RC1.
>
>But anyway, you might try RC1 since it might
Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of RC2,
I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing
ANYTHING about an RC1.
But anyway, you might try RC1 since it might be compatable with older versions of
Glibc, or upgrade glibc
Hi Ekkehard,
I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported
glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your box (installation). If not, I would
be interested to get some information about running JDK1.2.2 on a glibc2.1.1 system.
Are there any RC-builds pl
Odd, no mine worked fine right off the bat. It seems a bit faster to me, but
other than that I can't tell a difference (I don't do the hardcore-coding you all
do).
Best wishes,
-Riyad
Ekkehard Kraemer wrote:
> Hallo Riyad,
>
> RK>New release of JDK 1.2.2!
>
> After downloading the 20 MB and in
Hallo Riyad,
RK>New release of JDK 1.2.2!
After downloading the 20 MB and installing it (I wonder why it doesn't come as
standard .tgz, but never mind), I just get "Illegal instruction" (without any
other output) when running java oder appletviewer. I'm running a up-to-date
Debian potato system,
WOOHOO
New release of JDK 1.2.2!
--
[ Riyad Kalla ]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ CS - Major ]
[ University of Arizona ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
19 matches
Mail list logo
