Thanks to the work of Matthias Klose and Joris Patroons, Debian
packages for Blackdown J2SE 1.4.2-01 are available for i386 and AMD64
now.
To use the Debian packages, you have to add the following line to
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb /debian/ sarge non-free
Replace with your favorite
Hello,
On a related note. Is there currently anyone working on Java for the
Alpha arch? If so, who can I contact to help. If not, who could I
contact to see what would be needed?
Thanks,
Robert
Avi Cherry wrote:
I really, really don't mean to be a pest, but PLEASE, could someone
package up
I really, really don't mean to be a pest, but PLEASE, could someone
package up java 1.4.1 as a debian package, for use on deb stable? I
asked this a month or two ago and was told that it would get taken care
of by someone on the blackdown team (Juergen, I believe) very soon.
Thanks,
Avi Cherry
* Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Maybe someone from the core team can comment ?
>
> For some time I used to make both the normal releases and the .deb
> packages but currently the Debian packages are maintained by someone
> else. This makes it somewhat ha
releases and the .deb
packages but currently the Debian packages are maintained by someone
else. This makes it somewhat hard to predict release dates for the
packages.
Juergen
--
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://www.blackdown.org/ja
xtracting .tar.bz2 files only, however Debian packages should be
available soon.
> >b) Cannot find a Debian package (at least no 1.4.x version)
> I'm waiting for it too.
Actually, I need it for running an XML Editor
> I asked myself the same question.
> I reckon people are just work
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>Hi!
>I've seen an announcement of the Java 1.4.x Port quite some time ago
>which said something about "Debian packages available soon". While I'm
>sure this was quite some time ago, I:
>a) Cannot
xtracting .tar.bz2 files only, however Debian packages should be
available soon.
> >b) Cannot find a Debian package (at least no 1.4.x version)
> I'm waiting for it too.
Actually, I need it for running an XML Editor
> I asked myself the same question.
> I reckon people are just work
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>Hi!
>I've seen an announcement of the Java 1.4.x Port quite some time ago
>which said something about "Debian packages available soon". While I'm
>sure this was quite some time ago, I:
>a) Cannot
Hi!
I've seen an announcement of the Java 1.4.x Port quite some time ago
which said something about "Debian packages available soon". While I'm
sure this was quite some time ago, I:
a) Cannot find that press release anymore (on the website)
b) Cannot find a Debian packag
Weren't debian packages of the currently available java 1.3.1-02b
supposed to be out by now? We are a week away from the tentative release
date for Debian woody and it would be nice to have those packages
available. Thanks in advance for any info.
Nicolás Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have enojyed for some time the ability of getting Blackdown Java
> releases directly from apt for my Debian servers. This seems to be
> gone now. Are there plans to continue building Java as .deb
> files. It would be great
I have enojyed for some time the ability of getting Blackdown Java
releases directly from apt for my Debian servers. This seems to be gone
now. Are there plans to continue building Java as .deb files. It would
be great if these packages could be available again!
Thanks
Michael G. Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been using Java on Linux for quite some time now, but have only
> recently experimented with the many available IDEs. I'm using the
> excellent Blackdown Debian packages (1.3.1) and have experimented
> with both Ne
I've been using Java on Linux for quite some time now, but have only
recently experimented with the many available IDEs. I'm using the
excellent Blackdown Debian packages (1.3.1) and have experimented with
both Netbeans and (currently) jEdit. On both, I have had considerable
difficulty
The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of
the release candidate 1 of Java2 SE v1.3 and Debian packages for Java2
SE v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and JAI 1.0.2.
Java2 Standard Edition Version 1.3 RC1
==
Don't confuse the Blackdown RC1
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Did you specify the right classname (with and without package) in the
> two javah invocations? Did you notice that the two javah invocations
> produced .h files with different names?
Aha! So it's not 'javah MyClass' but 'javah 'org.digart.MyClass'. That
did the trick. Th
Did you specify the right classname (with and without package) in the
two javah invocations? Did you notice that the two javah invocations
produced .h files with different names?
Nathan
JB wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >
> > JB wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all. I have created and successfully run
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> JB wrote:
> >
> > Hi all. I have created and successfully run a JNI *.so on RH6 but for
> > one thing.
> > When I package the java src that contains the native methods, I get an
> > UnsatifiedLinkerError for the method call. When I try to package it, it
> > seems to load
JB wrote:
>
> Hi all. I have created and successfully run a JNI *.so on RH6 but for
> one thing.
> When I package the java src that contains the native methods, I get an
> UnsatifiedLinkerError for the method call. When I try to package it, it
> seems to load properly but dies when I call any nat
Hi all. I have created and successfully run a JNI *.so on RH6 but for
one thing.
When I package the java src that contains the native methods, I get an
UnsatifiedLinkerError for the method call. When I try to package it, it
seems to load properly but dies when I call any native methods. The
packa
throw new Exception("Error reading class " + className);
}
}
return clazz;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have written my own Custom Class Loader to emulate the Primordial [System
> Default] Class Loader in the Virtual Machine?
>
> It works fine, except I d
I have written my own Custom Class Loader to emulate the Primordial [System
Default] Class Loader in the Virtual Machine?
It works fine, except I don't think it work across packages.
Basically I would like to do this :
Properties jvmProps = System.getPrope
Raju Karia wrote:
>
> Does Sun's committment to support the porting of Java to Linux include
> packages outside the JDK 1.2 Core API ? Obviously, pure Java packages
> will run on the JDK 1.2 port (some already run on JDK 1.1).
> I'm interested in seeing ports to Linux o
Does Sun's committment to support the porting of Java to Linux include
packages outside the JDK 1.2 Core API ? Obviously, pure Java packages
will run on the JDK 1.2 port (some already run on JDK 1.1).
I'm interested in seeing ports to Linux of packages that depend on some
native code
> >I18N
> >JDK
> >JRE
> >RT
> >
> >Which do I need. and what are they all ?
> >
> >My guesses are -
> >
> >JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
> >JRE - runtime environment (for distribution)
> >I18N - internationalization (do I need to install on top of JDK / JRE ?)
> >RT - no idea
>
> Close - ve
On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 14:18:15 + (GMT), Philip Nelson wrote:
>On the Blackdown web / FTP site there are four packages -
>
>I18N
>JDK
>JRE
>RT
>
>Which do I need. and what are they all ?
>
>My guesses are -
>
>JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
>
On the Blackdown web / FTP site there are four packages -
I18N
JDK
JRE
RT
Which do I need. and what are they all ?
My guesses are -
JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
JRE - runtime environment (for distribution)
I18N - internationalization (do I need to install on top of JDK / JRE
Steve,
> OK, the alphaworks site is now back up. I know people told me to
wait
> until Monday to get the latest but I wanted to try it now.
Well I've just been there as well and have collected 0.41 which is
the very latest.
> The first error came up because I didn't have the right version of
>
David Warnock wrote:
> > > The address is http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/formula/Jikes/ (it's
> > > available as a link from the blackdown site).
>
> > Either this URL is wrong or their server is down. I cannot
> connect.
>
> Steve,
>
> I am pretty sure the url is correct but I also could not
> > The address is http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/formula/Jikes/ (it's
> > available as a link from the blackdown site).
> Either this URL is wrong or their server is down. I cannot
connect.
Steve,
I am pretty sure the url is correct but I also could not connect just
now. As John has said a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, David Warnock wrote:
> > Can I suggest you download the JIKES compiler from IBM. It's free, it
> > runs an order of magnitude faster than JAVAC and so far as I can see
> > the -depend works. You may want to use the +E compiler switch to get
> > err
David Warnock wrote:
> Steve,
>
> > I find that I'm unable to get rid of the following errors when I do
> a
> > javac depend of my whole project:
>
> I have read soimewhere sometime that javac -depend is not reliable.
>
> Can I suggest you download the JIKES compiler from IBM. It's free, it
> run
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, David Warnock wrote:
> Steve,
>
> > I find that I'm unable to get rid of the following errors when I do
> a
> > javac depend of my whole project:
>
> I have read soimewhere sometime that javac -depend is not reliable.
>
> Can I suggest you download the JIKES compiler from I
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Steve Cohen wrote:
> I find that I'm unable to get rid of the following errors when I do a
> javac depend of my whole project:
>
> error: File /usr/local/java/xyz/Scheduler.java does not contain nested
> class xyz.Scheduler. 1 as expected. Please adjust the class path so that
Steve,
> I find that I'm unable to get rid of the following errors when I do
a
> javac depend of my whole project:
I have read soimewhere sometime that javac -depend is not reliable.
Can I suggest you download the JIKES compiler from IBM. It's free, it
runs an order of magnitude faster than JAV
I find that I'm unable to get rid of the following errors when I do a
javac depend of my whole project:
error: File /usr/local/java/xyz/Scheduler.java does not contain nested
class xyz.Scheduler. 1 as expected. Please adjust the class path so that
the file does not appear in the package xyz.
Wh
gt;
> >> Sorry about that, but I have had to fix code where the top of the
> >> file had import .*; import .*; etc. Basically importing every
> >> package in the whole product - almost 30 lines of these - and then
> >> trying to figure out what
PROTECTED]
> Subject: re: packages
>
> On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 11:33:42 -0300 (ADT), Kenny Freeman wrote:
>
> >
> >> I personally am rather against most import statements as they can
> >> only help to confuse the issue of what you are looking at. Even
> wor
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:02:55 -0300 (ADT), Kenny Freeman wrote:
>I see your point now. I agree with you when you say doing this is a bad
>thing:
> import foo.bar.*;
> import foo2.bar2.*;
>This does cause problems and is not nec. a good thing to do - but I was
>generally thinking allong
gt;
> >> Sorry about that, but I have had to fix code where the top of the
> >> file had import .*; import .*; etc. Basically importing every
> >> package in the whole product - almost 30 lines of these - and then
> >> trying to figure out what
to fix code where the top of the
>> file had import .*; import .*; etc. Basically importing every
>> package in the whole product - almost 30 lines of these - and then
>> trying to figure out what the DataTrack class is and which one it used -
>> since there was a
very
> package in the whole product - almost 30 lines of these - and then
> trying to figure out what the DataTrack class is and which one it used -
> since there was a different one in three different packages...
>
> BTW - This was only one person who did this in his souce - and his
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:54:36 +0200, Maarten van Leunen wrote:
>Howdie,
>
>Anyone know how these darned packages work? Or where a good guide is
>available concerning packages?
>
>I can't seem to find anything about it in the nice Sun Java Tutorial.
Well, it is covered i
Howdie,
Anyone know how these darned packages work? Or where a good guide is
available concerning packages?
I can't seem to find anything about it in the nice Sun Java Tutorial.
--
Maarten van Leunen
Student - Fontys Institute of Technology Eindhoven
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 102481608 5 Mar 25 12:35 unstable -> slink
>
> Juergen> I'm using jdk-1.1.5v7 (tar.gz version) with
> Juergen> libc6_2.0.7pre3-1.
>
> That means you *aren't* using the *.deb? So you've got the lic5
> version of blackdown (or a mirr
message. :)
Juergen> I'm using jdk-1.1.5v7 (tar.gz version) with
Juergen> libc6_2.0.7pre3-1.
That means you *aren't* using the *.deb? So you've got the lic5
version of blackdown (or a mirror).
Debian requires all packages that will bew part of debian 2.0 to be
glibc ba
quire the very latest development
> Louis-David> versions of glibc. On my Debian-2.0 system the
> Louis-David> glibc-2.0.7pre1 won't cut it. Could a kind sould send
> Louis-David> me a pointer as where are the latest .deb packages?
> Louis-David> I&#x
y latest development
> Louis-David> versions of glibc. On my Debian-2.0 system the
> Louis-David> glibc-2.0.7pre1 won't cut it. Could a kind sould send
> Louis-David> me a pointer as where are the latest .deb packages?
> Louis-David> I've looked on ftp
Debian-2.0 system the
Louis-David> glibc-2.0.7pre1 won't cut it. Could a kind sould send
Louis-David> me a pointer as where are the latest .deb packages?
Louis-David> I've looked on ftp.debian.org and couldn't find the
Louis-David> new "unstable
Someone mentioned that the glibc versions of Steve Byrne's ports require
the very latest development versions of glibc. On my Debian-2.0 system
the glibc-2.0.7pre1 won't cut it. Could a kind sould send me a pointer
as where are the latest .deb packages? I've looked on ftp.debian.o
51 matches
Mail list logo
