On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:43:51 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok getting off topic here, nope ubuntu and freebsd partitions 160GB ,
> solaris only manages to see 130GB to partition on top of this the
> original drive that was in my fire v100 rack is now not usable in
> solaris as it
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:57:22 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you installing Solaris 10 on a SPARC based box? The by now very old
Ultra 5 and 10 had a IDE controller that was limited to 128GB, but that
applies to all OSes you'd install on them.
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:57:22 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh well, it would have been really nice, ive gone back to installing
> solaris 10, however it doesnt seem its progressed in any way at all.
> I managed to get both freebsd and ubuntu installed in under 20 mins,
> with solar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:49:43PM +0200, Johan Vos wrote:
Hi,
I did the port to Linux/SPARC for JDK 1.2, but I don't have a performant
Linux/Sparc machine anymore and 1.5 is very different from 1.2. Apart
from that, I don't think there is a huge interes
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:49:43PM +0200, Johan Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did the port to Linux/SPARC for JDK 1.2, but I don't have a performant
> Linux/Sparc machine anymore and 1.5 is very different from 1.2. Apart
> from that, I don't think there is a huge interest in Linux/SPARC
> anymore, as
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:44:59 +1000
Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2006, at 11:28 PM, Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000
> > Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> my last resort is of course solaris 10.
> >
> > In my experience, on SPARC S
On 04/09/2006, at 11:28 PM, Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my last resort is of course solaris 10.
In my experience, on SPARC Solaris 10 is the superior OS.
developer resources are scarce for sparc
another option for linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jurgen Kreileder, there is one bug left that prevents a
release.
At this time, no JVM is running on the sparc port because of some
changes in the glibc that cause the 1.4.1 (only 1.4 jdm released) to
crash on non trivial load.
Don't ask me, I don't know h
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:18:07PM +1000, Dan Rossi wrote:
> Hi, im trying to get answers about this, after reading the 1.5 status
>
> http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/j2se1.5-status.html
>
> it states there is jdk1.5 support for sparc among other platforms.
> However when i go i
Klaus Wagner wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:18 +1000, Dan Rossi wrote:
Hi, im trying to get answers about this, after reading the 1.5 status
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/j2se1.5-status.html
it states there is jdk1.5 support for sparc among
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:18 +1000, Dan Rossi wrote:
> Hi, im trying to get answers about this, after reading the 1.5 status
>
> http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/j2se1.5-status.html
>
> it states there is jdk1.5 support for sparc among other platforms.
> However when i go into all
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my last resort is of course solaris 10.
In my experience, on SPARC Solaris 10 is the superior OS.
Ok but in terms of admining the upkeep of a
developer server obviousl
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000
Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my last resort is of course solaris 10.
In my experience, on SPARC Solaris 10 is the superior OS.
--
Stefaan
--
As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning,
and meaningful statements lose precision. -- Lotfi Za
Hi, im trying to get answers about this, after
reading the 1.5 status
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/j2se1.5-status.html
it states there is jdk1.5 support for sparc among other platforms.
However when i go into all the mirrors i can only see 1.4 available. Im
wondering if i
14 matches
Mail list logo
