Hi, Everyone
I am a student. My supervisor will give me 5000$ for buying java
development/testing software.
Who can give me some suggestions about which software is worth buying.
Thanks advance
yangyuexiang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Time-wise, how long does it take to re-run the JCK tests? (
please let me know the hardware its being run on )
Best wishes,
--
[ Riyad Kalla ]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ CS - Major ]
[ University of Arizona ]
-
test 123
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
test
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Test 2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test 3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test 1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pack();
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
Test f = new Test();
f.setLayout(new FlowLayout());
}
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:50 AM 6/14/99 -0400, Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
>Thanks! Unfortunately, the Volano test suite probably won't meet my
>needs, since it is highly client/server oriented.
that might actually be a good thing... unless what you want to benchmark is
pure low level math or numbe
>Thanks! Unfortunately, the Volano test suite probably won't meet my
>needs, since it is highly client/server oriented.
>
There's an older benchmark, CaffeineMark3, which I once grabbed from
Pendragon Software (www.pendragon-software.com). Don't know whether it
Thanks! Unfortunately, the Volano test suite probably won't meet my
needs, since it is highly client/server oriented.
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> At 09:48 AM 6/13/99 -0400, Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
> >Can someone point me to a URL or resource that will allow
At 09:48 AM 6/13/99 -0400, Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
>Can someone point me to a URL or resource that will allow me to
>do a simple and reasonably accurate speed comparison?
you do realize these are contradictory terms, do you not?
I think Volano might make some of their stuff public... yup
www
I'm currently trying to do speed-testing between IBM JDK, Blackdown
JDK 1.1.7v3 and JDK1.2v2 pre-release, with and w/o TYA. However,
I cannot locate a suitable test suite.
Can someone point me to a URL or resource that will allow me to
do a simple and reasonably accurate speed compa
test
~
Yohans Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sirius Images Inc. Unix Administrator
http://www2.utep.edu/~yohans
me string,
hashtable and math operations.
I used to test JDK 1.1.7 speed on Windows against Linux. Don't expect to
something interesting.
But JDK 1.2 finished the program 3 times faster than JDK 1.1.7 so , this
does mean something, isn't it?
Something goes faster deep inside ... :-)
I had the same problem.
Managed to fix it though.
I simply created a link to libstdc++.so.2.8.0 in
/usr/lib from the file it required. Sorta worked,
although I do get lots of font warnings - but java runs
OK.
Not sure whether it is really a fix or what.
James
--- George Lawton <[EMAIL PROTEC
RedHat 5.2 on Intel Pentium 100 mHz cpu
Installation went as described
Ran demos. Demos in jdk1.2/demo/applets all seem to work in Netscape
Navigator 4.0
jfc demos all fail. Message is
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatifiedLinkError:
/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanager.so: libstdc++-
.
Embedded CafineMark 3.0 with TYA JIT - 2586
Applet CaffineMark 3.0 with TYA JIT - 1475
Thanks to those who pointed out the JIT issue.
Cliff Kotnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cliff Kotnik wrote:
> I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
> the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for
benchmark.
Mo DeJong
dejong at cs.umn.edu
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Cliff Kotnik wrote:
> I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
> the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for SUN's Win32
> JDK vs. the Linux JDK are so disappointing, I wonder if I've
> made some goo
>>>>> Cliff Kotnik writes:
Cliff> I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
Cliff> the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for SUN's Win32
Cliff> JDK vs. the Linux JDK are so disappointing, I wonder if I've
Cliff> made some
I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for SUN's Win32
JDK vs. the Linux JDK are so disappointing, I wonder if I've
made some goof in running the tests. Any help would be
appreciated.
Hardware: Del XPS R400 PII 400 MHz 128
Hi-
Has anyone put together a test suite for Sun's HPI? I'm struggling my way
through the process of porting the JDK to BeOS, but due to the lack of
documentation, I am realizing that the HPI is going to be difficult to debug
without building the entire VM and running the tests in
Hello fellow java-linux users.
I have been working on an open source project that provides a
way to combine Java and the Tcl scripting languages using the
java reflection APIs. I was hoping I could get some help
testing the code to make sure it works on a number of linux
systems. To make a long s
some questions.
a Q2 dedicated server. I was using Q2Java as
a publicly available test complementing a project of mine,
as it uses Invocation, JNI, within a legacy app that does
DLL loading, heavy UDP networking, sound device access, and
X11. That app, of course, being the Linux port of id
Software's Quake
Hello
If I can get some java development info from your side, i would like to
keep in touch with you.
pl. reply
nanda
testing...
Just testing before I write a nice long mail all about firewall tunneling:)
--
John Baker, Software Engineer, Java coder, Salad sarnie lover.
Work: (01203) 562000 ext 4153
Home: (01203) 601890
For those of you who downloaded this, I'd sure appreciate any feedback.
x27;re willing to
document and work with us on problems.
At this time, only the JDK (without documentation or demos) is
available.
New in this Release
===
* This is our first test release v3 of JDK 1.1.6 for i386
- Bad or Missing KeyPressed events are fixed (a Sun bug)
code:
{
Object o=Finding.detect(this,new UnaryPredicate()
{
23: public boolean execute(Object o)
{ return ((Field)o).GetTag().charAt(0)!='0'; }
});
if(o==null)
throw new NoSuchElementException("No primary field.");
return (Field)o;
}
jikes output:
Hi,
next time I'll release another version of
my TYA JIT compiler add on for Linux x86.
TYA 0.8 is _not_ faster TYA 0.7, but once again
I've fixed some bugs. If you have running TYA 0.7 without
any problems, don't expect too much. But if you are running
java programs TYA 0.7 can't run (aborti
Sun in 1.1.6 introduced a new way of generating keyTyped events that
interferes with the correct generation of KeyPressed events. I have fixed
this problem (it appears in Solaris 1.1.6) and added the patch to the code
base. The PowerPC JDK just released an updated jdk116_v2a that fixes this
prob
Christopher Seawood writes:
> The jdk1.1.6 v2-test1 files are available at http://www.seawood.org/java/.
Fails just as the SN glibc port. Segfault attributed to
segfault dl-runtime.c::_dl_lookup_symbol on a
call to open( char*, int), only change in the C
application is adding "-ljava" to "-ldl"
No sooner than I sent out the first notice than I received a message from
one of the libc maintainers. There was indeed a bug in the getlocalhost
code wrt glibc. The fixed version is at
http://www.seawood.org/java/getlocalhost2.c for the curious.
The new tarballs are at
http://www.seawood.or
The jdk1.1.6 v2-test1 files are available at http://www.seawood.org/java/.
It does not fix the InetAddr.getLocalHost() problem as that problem seems
to be a general glibc problem. See
http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full/667 for details.
As a workaround for that problem, eit
With jdk1.1.6 v2-test i have discovered a strange behavior
in a keyPressed event handling routine. The getKeyChar() function
should return a Unicode or CHAR_UNDEFINED value.
This is what i get:
java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=10,Enter] on frame0
KeyCode=10 Modifiers=0 KeyChar=65293
Steve Byrne writes:
> > Great, is this the version for glibc ?
> Nope -- libc5 -- that's what I build with. If you've got a fast network
> connection, it's still worth a download -- I think that if you've got a recent
> enough version of glibc (and libdl 2.x) that you still may be able to us
ncountered,
> > > menu not displaying properly and title bar displaying AWt... have already
> > > been discussed on this list. (I checked the archive).
> >
> > Try looking in http://www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v2-test
> > The files here are what is intended to
playing AWt... have already
> > been discussed on this list. (I checked the archive).
>
> Try looking in http://www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v2-test
> The files here are what is intended to be 1.1.6v2, unless we hear from people
> there are serious problems with the release.
Great, is this the version for glibc ?
Herald
n this list. (I checked the archive).
Try looking in http://www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v2-test
The files here are what is intended to be 1.1.6v2, unless we hear from people
there are serious problems with the release.
>From the README.linux, here's what's fixed in this release:
* P
David B. Rees writes:
> On 29-May-98 Steve Byrne wrote:
> > >
> > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
>
> I've also got this same pro
I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
> >
> > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on:
> >
> >
> > 0. with
On 29-May-98 Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
I've also got this same problem with the stock jdk1.1.5-v7 and ld.so-1.9.9.
This i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
>
> I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on:
>
>
&g
I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on:
0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed:
1. Installed jdk1.
Hi all,
sbb jdk1.1.6v1 seems to have an awt bug when running KDE.
Frames have always the title text "AWTapp" visible.
Interestingly the same bug appeared in early 1.1.5
versions.
My system:
Suse 5.1 (libc5)
KDE Beta 4
sbb JDK 1.1.6 v1-test source diffs + orig. Sun sources
Just a test, please ignore.
begin: vcard
fn: Gao Lei
n: Lei;Gao
org:StarGlobe
adr:International Business Park;;#09-02, The Synergy;Singapore;Singaproe;609917;Singapore
email;internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
title: Software Engineer
I finally got a chance to build this. It's based upon Byrne's 1.1.6
diffs. It hasn't been tested much but it works for the java apps I use.
You can grab it from:
http://www.seawood.org/java/
- cls
ion of jdk1.1.6.
After a lot of trying, I've found that simply erasing every line in
font.properties after the line:
# exclusion info.
makes the problem dissappear, but I don't know if this affects anything else.
I've also made a simple test applet that demonstrates the problem, whic
For the brave, foolhardy, etc. I've put a test version of
JDK 1.1.6 v1 into
http://www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v1-test
This seems to work reasonably well, although it's reported that KDE and
AfterStep are exhibiting problems with window positioning and possibly sizing.
Many tha
52 matches
Mail list logo
