; > child (i.e., extra install dependent ).
> > >
> > > Something like this
> > >
> > > JavaSoft
> > >|
> > >|-Extensions
> > >| |-Java3D
> > > | |-JavaSpeech
ke this
> > >
> > > JavaSoft
> > >|
> > >|-Extensions
> > >| |-Java3D
> > > | |-JavaSpeech(?)
> > >| |-JavaMediaFrameWork(?)
> >
|-Extensions
> >| |-Java3D
> >| |-JavaSpeech(?)
> >| |-JavaMediaFrameWork(?)
> >| -JRE
> > |-1.3.1_02
> > |-1.4.0
> >
ginal Message -
> From: "Mark Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] HTMLConverter vs APPLET Tag
>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:50:03 -0500
> > > From: John Wr
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] HTMLConverter vs APPLET Tag
> > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:50:03 -0500
> > From: John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I also came across this FAQ that may be of interest to Ja
Mark,
That FAQ comes from the JDK 1.4.0 documentation:
/j2sdk1.4.0/docs/guide/plugin/developer_guide/faq/troubleshooting.html
the same documentation can be found online at:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/plugin/developer_guide/faq/troubleshooting.html
There are times when Java's own
I lost all hope of ever understanding the Plug-in install when I added 1.4
on W2k, and I now have TWO plug-in control panels, one each for 1.3 and 1.4.
In either panel, I can apparently select one of eight different JREs, four
each from 1.3 and 1.4. Both control panels, on their Browser tabs, give
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:50:03 -0500
> From: John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I also came across this FAQ that may be of interest to Java 3D
> developers:
>
> "Q: We are trying to use Java 3D with Java Plug-in but it doesn't work
> at all. Why?
>
> A: Java 3D comes with various packa
I just read the Java Plug-In documentation. It seems HTMLConverter is
not dead at all, as it is the method for which we still use to detect
whether a user has the Java Plug-In installed or not (and directs them
to install it if they don't have it).
We as (Java) developers would tend not to notic
Kyle (& Everyone),
Thank you Kyle, I did some testing. IF the user has Java 1.4 installed
then yes there is an option to use the plug in. I also checked a stock
Win98SE install (IE 5.0) and without installing Java 1.4 this option is
not there for IE either!
So I agree "HTMLConverter is dead" b
John Wright wrote:
> Allessandro,
>
> Sure... HTMLConverter *would* be dead if they'd make Netscape 4.7x
> handle just the APPLET tag too. I've tried IE & Netscape 6 (several
> versions of each) as well as Mozilla & Opera. For my own personal
> preference Netscape 4.7x is far better than any of
11 matches
Mail list logo
