[JAVA3D] SV: [JAVA3D] floor texturing

2003-12-08 Thread Fredrik Andersson
Hello Tom!   I developed this class for a ground. I think I use the 3:rd constructor. But perhaps this isn't the best way, I do not know.   Best regards Fredrik    import java.applet.*; import java.awt.*; import java.awt.Frame; import java.awt.event.*; import com.sun.j3d.utils.applet.MainF

[JAVA3D] What version of Java 3D do you distribute? (was Re: [JAVA3D] How do you open a number of Canavas3D's?)

2003-12-08 Thread Mr H. Morgan
Hi All, I solved my problem, by using the Direct X version of java 3D. However, on some machines this causes a Blue Screen of Death (Older versions of the graphics driver). What I am wondering, if anyone distributes Java 3D with their product, what version of Java 3D do you use? On what proporti

[JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread Nikolai V. Chr.
I am having some trouble with the canvas. I put the canvas inside a JPanel with a cardlayout, and select another card to be in front. Then I add the JPanel to a visible component. The trouble is: the Canvas3D now shows in front, no matter which card I ask to see. This happens only for 20 seconds o

Re: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread "Schäfer, Peter"
I also have a Canvas3D inside a CardLayout and it works fine for me. I have setDoubleBuffered(false) and setOpaque(true). Don't know if this has any relevance for your problem, but maybe it helps... > I am having some trouble with the canvas. I put the canvas > inside a JPanel with a cardlayout,

Re: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread Nikolai V. Chr.
Schäfer, Peter wrote: I also have a Canvas3D inside a CardLayout and it works fine for me. I have setDoubleBuffered(false) and setOpaque(true). Don't know if this has any relevance for your problem, but maybe it helps... Just tried that it didn't. But thank you anyway. -

Re: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread Pasi Paasiala
Title: RE: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout? I assume that you can't use Canvas3D with CardLayout, since Canvas3D is a heavyweight component. It gets drawn on top of lightweight (Swing) components. I think there's some info about this in j3d.org. Try also to find information w

[JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Nikolai V. Chr.
Concerned about the future of Java3D? There is a poll up at Sun's Java3D developer forum, please participate. http://www.javagaming.org/cgi-bin/JGNetForums/YaBB.cgi?board=3D;action=display;num=1070879099 === To unsubscribe,

Re: [JAVA3D] Center of gravity of a polygon

2003-12-08 Thread Shyam Prakash
Hello,     Thanks for the reply. I have succeeded in calculating the centroid of the polygon. If anybody else is interested, then following link could be useful.   http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/acis-alliance/2003-September/000171.html   --Shyam   =

Re: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread Shyam Prakash
Following links could be helpful http://www.j3d.org/faq/swing.html#tabs http://www.j3d.org/tutorials/quick_fix/swing.html --Shyam > -Original Message- > From: Discussion list for Java 3D API [mailto:JAVA3D- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikolai V. Chr. > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Michael Pfeiffer
It isn't very funny that I have to register only for this poll. Beside of that, the registration seem not to work, I don't get an activation email and when I try to log in without it, it tells me that my username doesn't exists. On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:41:47 +0100, Nikolai V. Chr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [JAVA3D] Canvas3D incompatible with card-layout?

2003-12-08 Thread Nikolai V. Chr.
Shyam Prakash wrote: Following links could be helpful YES, indeed one of those solved my problem. I just override setVisible. Thank you Nikolai -- Nikolai V. Christensen, Computer Engineer, Simulation and Training department IFAD, Forskerparken 10A, DK

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Nikolai V. Chr.
Michael Pfeiffer wrote: It isn't very funny that I have to register only for this poll. Hmm, if you read this mailing-list you would probably also be interested in using that forum. Some of the people there are very capable and are not using this mailing-list. Beside of that, the registration s

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread N Vaidya
Aha ! A clever ploy to increase subscription to javagaming.org :-) ...just kiddin'. That site is pretty active, BTW. Vaidya === To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Britton
Yeah, same here, too bad. I'm not voting for this thing. CHRIS Michael Pfeiffer wrote: It isn't very funny that I have to register only for this poll. Beside of that, the registration seem not to work, I don't get an activation email and when I try to log in without it, it tells me that my userna

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Michael Pfeiffer
And they discuss the same disinformation about Java3Ds future like we did it here. It seems that j3d.org has become a website which damages the reputation of J3D instead of informing about it. Together with the dead links in the loaders and device sections and with the outdated version information

Re: [JAVA3D] GeometryInfo

2003-12-08 Thread Paul Pantera
I can help you with GeometryInfo problems. I have some code that generates a 'rounded stick' like object I use for creating molecular stick models. The GeometryInfo class interests me and looks like it could save me a lot of work. That is if I could get it to work. Case 1: def createNormals(self)

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread Alan Hudson
Michael Pfeiffer wrote: And they discuss the same disinformation about Java3Ds future like we did it here. It seems that j3d.org has become a website which damages the reputation of J3D instead of informing about it. Together with the dead links in the loaders and device sections and with the outd

[JAVA3D] ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

2003-12-08 Thread Alan Hudson
I tried Java3D on two laptops this week with ATI Mobility 9000 cards. Java3D ran fine until I resized the window. Then I got some weird rendering artifacts. Basically looks like some items have messed up z depth. It something way in the distance would break through something close. Anyone else s

Re: [JAVA3D] ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

2003-12-08 Thread Kevin Glass
Alan, Yep, I've got a Mobility 9000, I can test if you need. I've never noticed any atifacts. I did however get the latest Omega drivers instead of limiting to what my laptop maker (Fujitsu Siemens) restricts me to. Kev Alan Hudson wrote: I tried Java3D on two laptops this week with ATI Mobility

[JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question

2003-12-08 Thread Robert Jacobsen
All,   Regarding the discussion thread from last week, I decided to send an e-mail to Doug Twilleager, the lead at Sun for Java 3D.   You can judge his answer for yourself.  8^/   -RJ   - Original Message - From: Doug Twilleager To: Robert Jacobsen Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003

Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question

2003-12-08 Thread Michael Pfeiffer
At least this information is more than a assertion without substance that J3D is dead. I wrote to Sun some time ago too to get information about the future and received this information on 18. 09. 2003: "Hi Michael, We are committed to supporting Java 3D. We are still working out the plans for how

[JAVA3D] Java 3D FAQ Weekly Posting (08 Dec 2003)

2003-12-08 Thread The Java 3D FAQ
The Java 3D Frequently Asked Questions list for Monday December 8 2003 This is a posting of topics covered in the Java 3D FAQ. The answers to these questions are kept at: http://www.j3d.org/faq Please consult this list and the web site before asking questions on the mailing list. If th

Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question

2003-12-08 Thread Robert Jacobsen
Yep, Sounds like we both got the party line on this one! -RJ - Original Message - From: "Michael Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:51 PM Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question > At least this information is more

Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question

2003-12-08 Thread William Denniss
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 05:51, Michael Pfeiffer wrote: > At least this information is more than a assertion without substance that > J3D is dead. I wrote to Sun some time ago too to get information about the > future and received this information on 18. 09. 2003: > Since the word "dead" seems to o

Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question

2003-12-08 Thread ZACZEK, MARIUSZ P. (MARIO) (JSC-DM) (NASA)
"Java3D development has stagnated." ... isn't that right now (at least on Sun side)? Mario Mariusz Zaczek NASA - Johnson Space Center Automated Vehicles and Orbit Analysis / DM35 Flight Design and Dynamics Division Mission Operations Directorate Bldg: 30A Room: 3040A Disclaimer: "The opi

Re: [JAVA3D] The real future of Java3D

2003-12-08 Thread William Denniss
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 02:06, Christian Britton wrote: > Yeah, same here, too bad. I'm not voting for this thing. Sun's javagaming.org forums are very active, well run, and contain a vast amount of knowledge. Will. === To uns

Re: [JAVA3D] ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

2003-12-08 Thread Pasi Paasiala
Title: RE: [JAVA3D] ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 One of our customers had problems with that card. The first problem that we had about six months ago was that when shapes had normals to both sides, they reflected way too much light. We bought a ATI 9100 card and were able to duplicate that proble