Patches item #433345, was updated on 2001-06-15 00:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=433345group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jesper Pedersen (jews)
Assigned to:
Patches item #433350, was updated on 2001-06-15 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=433350group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jesper Pedersen (jews)
Assigned to:
Hi,
IMHO, the re-deployment problem (see below) should stop you making a new
release.
For my part, I will test/validate the new DTD validation option as some
elements are still missing from jaws.dtd (cmp-field is not defined). I will
take care of dtd corrections.
Vincent.
[Container
We're not making a new FINAL release on Monday, it's a feature freeze for
2.4 BETA.
AFAIK, Monday is still ok.
-- Juha
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Vincent Harcq wrote:
Hi,
IMHO, the re-deployment problem (see below) should stop you making a new
release.
For my part, I will test/validate the
Hello Georg,
Nope! That is whatI
thought as well. The bean *is* being loaded even with commit options A and B,
for the same operation with the transactions settings remaining the
same.
Vinay
- Original Message -
From:
Georg
Rehfeld
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
This is just a suprious exception that can easily be cleaned up.
Its also just a feature freeze to create the 2.4 branch, not a 2.4
release build as Juha said. The first release on the 2.4 branch
will be a beta.
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Harcq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I seem to agree with Jay. The web server in Tomcat sucks. It is very slow!
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Schaefer, Andreas ' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:34 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
I fail to
I would have liked to have added the ROWID bit, but don't want to rush it
thru!
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date
This is just a
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:26:45
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Remove the SecurityAssociation class from the run.jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.77 +1 -3 jboss/src/build/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:26:01
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Initialize the SecurityAssociation server mode in JaasSecurityManagerService
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +4 -4 jbosssx/src/build/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:26:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins JaasSecurityManager.java
JaasSecurityManagerService.java
Log:
Initialize the SecurityAssociation server mode in JaasSecurityManagerService
Revision ChangesPath
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:26:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/auth/callback
SecurityAssociationHandler.java
Log:
Initialize the SecurityAssociation server mode in JaasSecurityManagerService
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +5 -4
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:27:52
Modified:src/lib jboss-jaas.jar jbosssx.jar
Log:
Include updated JBossSX jars
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +55 -53jboss/src/lib/jboss-jaas.jar
Binary file
1.11 +94 -87jboss/src/lib/jbosssx.jar
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:31:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins SecurityInterceptor.java
Log:
Add support for the EJB2.0 security-identity/run-as element
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +90 -9
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/06/15 01:35:16
Modified:src/build/stylesheets summary1.xsl
Log:
add disclaimer to daily test results mail
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +6 -0 jbosstest/src/build/stylesheets/summary1.xsl
Index: summary1.xsl
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:48:25
Modified:src/resources/security/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jboss-spec.xml
Log:
Add tests of the EJB2.0 security-identity/run-as element
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +85 -4 jbosstest/src/resources/security/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 01:48:25
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/security/ejb
StatelessSessionBean3.java
Log:
Add tests of the EJB2.0 security-identity/run-as element
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
My patches to implement JCA deployment are applied? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date
This is just a suprious
and you gonna run it for me? unless you put your work on the line, don't put
your mouth and opinions in front
I just realized I updated the cvs and the procedures wiped out the current
cvs so we REALLY have to make the switch now... prematurely but so it
goes...
that is when I close my eyes
Please send you version of good dtds, I can review them as well.
Or better : post them on sourceforge.
Thanks.
Vincent.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Mike
Swainston-Rainford
Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2001 11:46
À : [EMAIL
Amid the panic, there are some VERY VERY good news indeed,
congratulations Scott, this is amazing work... JAAS based security is
definitely a VERY strong point of JBoss adoption in high-end environments.
regards
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Well, you might want to finish it by the time my book comes out...
|:)
Alright go ahead and give them your plug :) what are you writing about these
days Aaron... (oh yeah wrox?)
| I thought there was a grand effort to unify the metadata models
|between EJX and JBoss and produce an
Really, I was just asking the question. You're doing it differently than I
would and I want to understand why.
Sounds like two things
(1) Hey why use apache is tomcat can serve static content. Plus seems
like you made a bunch of stuff into jsps.
(2) Pure java and some other 4th gen
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 07:22:03
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security SecurityAssociation.java
Log:
Add support for implementation of the EJB2.0 run-as
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +64 -12jboss/src/main/org/jboss/security/SecurityAssociation.java
Index:
am not arguing about why we can't use Apache. Just saying that after a lot
of benchmarking and stuff the web server on tomcat was lacking. It has
nothing to do with me running the site!
as for tomcat - go ahead! I can help in whatever way I can ... but the
performance on 8080 sucks! I stand by
I have no basis to make any comment, I've never even tried to start Jetty.
Just suggesting we have two bundles for download, if the Tomcat one is not
suitable for some reason, I would try Jetty next.
Tomcat is in general a slow servlet engine, but my experience was comparing
it with COTS servlet
Hey, looks good and runs good.
One sore spot, tried the search documentation feature looking for db2 and
oracle and got a 404 error back both times.
Great work Marc. Now we can eat our down dogfood...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Looks good Marc!
The following like does not work :
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/ECperf.html
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge.
Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
works for me
I go to the documentation page, enter db2 and search and I get the right
stuff back...
when I click on it it takes me to the documentation.
what gives?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
|Walters
|Sent:
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 08:51:56
Modified:.cvs.jsp
Added: .CVSAdmin.html
Log:
Added the CVS admin policies document to the cvs.jsp page
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +64 -61newsite/cvs.jsp
Index: cvs.jsp
all the documentation IS A MESS because of the documentation/manual mess.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of K.V.
|Vinay Menon
|Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:44 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS.ORG back
The form that is produced by a doc search has a bad navigation frame.
Apparently this is the old navigation bar that is being cached by
search.freefind.com?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc,
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/files
and
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/migration.jsp
also giving error.
Tahir
-Original Message-
From: K.V. Vinay Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 09:14:08
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jboss.dtd
Added: src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jboss_2_4.dtd
Log:
Freeze the jboss.dtd at the 2.2 version
Move the main version to jboss_2_4.dtd
Revision ChangesPath
1.12
Hello all,
I have spent the past few hours reading up on other people with similar
problems to mine. So I am familiar with what the EJB spec says (somewhat
related to the diamond scenario (11.7.1 of the EJB Spec)) with respect to
when a Bean is required to write its data out to persistent
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 10:00:54
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd
Added: src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws_2_4.dtd
Log:
Freeze the jaws.dtd at the 2.2 version
Move the main versio to jaws_2_4.dtd
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +7
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 10:03:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata XmlFileLoader.java
Log:
Add local resolution from -//JBoss//DTD JAWS 2.4//EN to jaws_2_4.dtd
Add local resolution from -//JBoss//DTD JBOSS 2.4//EN to jboss_2_4.dtd
Revision ChangesPath
1.15
Sorry, I have been out for a while.
Just wanted to say that
Read committed is the default and was the only
automatic isolation level provided before Oracle
Release 7.3.
And Read committed is still the default which doesn't
let anybody even within the transaction see the
updated changes.
That's what I want ... I don't want the data to be committed, I just need it
to be visible by other operations that occur under the same transaction
context. In my example in my email, I neglected to mention what actually
happens when you execute my block of code:
The database throws a
The behavior you'd get by setting that flag to false in weblogic would
also allow him to not break referential integrity in the case of his
transaction.
Scott M Stark wrote:
Why is this a serious problem? The weblogic docs for the flag you mention
indicate the commit is still not done until
He's not removing the modified bean: he's removing a bean that the
modified bean used to refer to. The issue is that the remove causes a
data change immediately, while the table behind the modified bean still
has the foreign key for the row that's being removed. This violates
referential
Sorry. Ok so I'll read a little slower next time.
Now that you've explained it, how would it work to use database RI
underneath an EJB application. If the bean is in memory but disappears from
the database that isn't all that good. If he's using commit option C, then
next client to reference
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 11:00:17
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log4jService.java
Log:
Check the configuration file for a .xml extension and if it exists, use
the DOMConfigurator rather than PropertyConfigurator
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +12 -3
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 11:02:43
Modified:src/lib log4j.jar
Log:
Update to log4j 1.1.2
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +646 -524 jboss/src/lib/log4j.jar
Binary file
___
Jboss-development mailing list
Just a note for people seeing problems that everyhting still
looked broken until I did a shift-reload and got index.jsp instead of
index.html and then magically the site started working again.
Aaron
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
A big, sloppy, thank you thank you thank you to
Here's an example to further illustrate why delayed ejbStore() is
problematic.
What about a situation where you keep a 'bucket' in a table to improve the
performance of your application. For example, you keep a
current_account_balance in your User table rather than doing a
David Esposito wrote:
I am surprised that I am the only one that has raised this particular
example. It seems like it's something that people would do every day.
Actually it's far more common for people to complain about behavior
closer to what you want - Why is ejbStore being called so
I am wondering how many people are using declarative RI and entity beans? I
am sure the DBAs like the RI stuff in the database, but EJB seems to like to
be the only game in town - for example leaving it up to the container to
issue the SQL in whatever order it wants.
Cheers
-Original
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 11:33:46
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins SessionObjectInputStream.java
Log:
Implement the patch for Bug #432610 by overriding resolveProxyClass to
use the application class loader.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +28 -4
Just this excerpt from
http://technet.oracle.com/doc/server.815/a67781/c23cnsis.htm
Oracle offers the read committed and serializable
isolation levels, as well as a read-only mode that is
not part
of SQL92. Read committed is the default and was the
only automatic isolation level provided before
Hi,
Well, another possibility would be ketting your db vendor to check fk
constraints only on transaction boundaries, which would imho make the most
sense, however in the real world, Bill Burke just added (to cvs/2.3-2.4 I
think) some code that forces the container to store all modifications
I agree completely with you ... I knew when I wrote the original message
that there would be some strong opinions from both sides of the aisle... I'm
obviously shaded to the RDB side of the aisle mostly because I realize that
there are major performance benefits to letting the database do the
Hi,
sorry to nitpick, however my experience with Oracle's implementation of
read committed is that all operations done in a transaction are definitely
visible within that transaction. They are not visible to other
transactions until you commit. This is the standard industry wide meaning
of read
Well I am hoping I am just confused and have misunderstood you.
It appeared that you said JDBC connections and Sql*plus ones were different,
and that a if I perform an insert inside a transaction using JDBC that
within the same transaction I would not be able to read the row inserted.
If in
Actually Oracle will do this, are you using Oracle? You can change the
constraint checking to be deferred until commit.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejbStore() delay
7:28am up 30 days, 9:51, 4 users, load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.00
103 processes: 102 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 1.1% user, 3.0% system, 0.0% nice, 95.2% idle
CPU1 states: 0.4% user, 0.4% system, 0.0% nice, 98.2% idle
Mem: 1036004K av, 563048K used, 472956K
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 13:19:15
Removed: manual adv_config.html architecture.html clients.html
config.html deploying.html developing.html
dtds.html ejx.html examples.html extending.html
future.html
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 14:54:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log.java
Log:
Add check to prevent invalid console appender configurations from
creating infinite looping.
Add NDC.push()/NDC.pop() usage in the Log setLog()/unsetLog() methods
Revision Changes
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/15 14:54:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging/log4j CategoryStream.java
ConsoleAppender.java
Log:
Add check to prevent invalid console appender configurations from
creating infinite looping.
Add NDC.push()/NDC.pop() usage in
and, this is from the same page as before.
http://technet.oracle.com/doc/server.815/a67781/c23cnsis.htm#2570
Oracle Isolation Levels
Oracle provides three transaction isolation levels:
read committed
This is the default transaction isolation level. Each
query executed by a transaction sees
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 15:23:28
Removed: .CVSAdmin.html
Log:
Moving it to JSP format
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 15:24:03
Added: .CVSAdmin.jsp
Log:
Putting the JSP format online
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/CVSAdmin.jsp
Index: CVSAdmin.jsp
===
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/15 16:35:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins AbstractInstanceCache.java
Log:
We can't rely on the EnterpriseContext to provide PassivationJob
with a valid key because it may get freed to the InstancePool, then
reused before the
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 15:52:35
Modified:.cvs.jsp
Log:
new links
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +65 -64newsite/cvs.jsp
Index: cvs.jsp
===
RCS file:
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/15 16:37:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntityInstanceInterceptor.java
Log:
If an exception has been thrown, DO NOT remove the ctx from the InstanceCache
if the ctx has been registered in an
User: danch
Date: 01/06/15 16:59:07
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins CMPPersistenceManager.java
Log:
Clean up of stuff left over in CMPPersistenceManager from 1st round finder
optimization: my test (1000 entities) now completes in about 8.7 seconds - cached was
6.4
User: danch
Date: 01/06/15 16:59:07
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc
JDBCLoadEntitiesCommand.java
Log:
Clean up of stuff left over in CMPPersistenceManager from 1st round finder
optimization: my test (1000 entities) now completes in
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 15:55:53
Modified:.jboss-petstore.jsp jboss-projects.jsp
jboss-tomcat.jsp
Log:
update the doco mess
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -5 newsite/jboss-petstore.jsp
Index: jboss-petstore.jsp
User: danch
Date: 01/06/15 17:49:32
Modified:src/docs customizingjaws.xml
Log:
added doc for read-ahead option
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +42 -0 manual/src/docs/customizingjaws.xml
Index: customizingjaws.xml
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/15 15:58:06
Added: .ECPerf.html migration.jsp
Log:
Adding the new files
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/ECPerf.html
Index: ECPerf.html
===
Gina,
Why don't you bring up a SQL*PLUS window and try it yourself instead of
quoting Oracle manuals. My own experiments with SQL*PLUS and jdbc DO NOT
verify your claims. BTW, I'm on Oracle 8.1.7. Maybe older versions work
differently.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Marc,
is the interactive survey done yet?
if it is not done, who is team lead?
i like to get involved, since i have a bit of time..
Gina
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Hi Vinay, hi all,
Vinay:
This basically means that even within the same transaction the
rowid will be updated if the client attempts to do an update
[or delete].
Do we now need to check for rowid being null and falling back
to the primary key if it is not? I had written some code for
Hi Geeks
I was trying to create a management tool based on EJX but the reason
why I stopped was that there was no foundation to create a management
tool on it.
This should change and then we can create a good management tool on
it.
IMHO EJX is not bad but even for the XML Descriptor generation
Hi Gina and Marc
Marc, does and if yes do we want to add the Survey to CVS ?
Gina, I am the lead and came up with some initial classes but
they are not in a CVS repository. Let's see what Marc thinks
but you can reach me under [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mad Andy
- Original Message -
From:
Hi all,
trying to sort that out.
David Esposito showed us a perfectly OK sequence of modifications
to some Entity beans within one TX. He reported problems with JBoss
accessing the DB while persisting, because of changed order of
modifications, creates/deletes seem to be done before updates,
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:51:24
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +1 -1 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss.jcml
Index: jboss.jcml
===
RCS
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope
J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java
Log:
Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment J2eeDeployer.java
Log:
Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and additional
methods for the JBoss management.
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/configuration ConfigurationService.java
Log:
Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and additional
methods for the JBoss
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/naming JNDIView.java JNDIViewMBean.java
Log:
Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and additional
methods for the JBoss
User: schaefera
Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb Application.java
ContainerFactory.java
Log:
Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and
Jay, i am not arguing with you. As a matter of fact, i
am glad you are interacting with me on this.. I am
just a bit disturbed that there is such a discrepancy
between the doc and the actual stuff happening. i just
need to know why.. and i am gonna get deeper into it
this weekend, trace it and
Tobias
will be coordinating the contributions yes, please go to
jboss-docs..
regards
marcf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cyls98Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 7:30 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-Business@Yahoogroups. Com;
Marc,
That's great. Pls tell us how and who is the
coordinator for the book. Is it Tobias?
Lionel
- Original Message -
From:
marc
fleury
To: Jboss-Docs@Egroups. Com ; Jboss-Business@Yahoogroups.
Com ; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net ; Jboss-Development@Lists.
85 matches
Mail list logo
