on 1-10-19 17.26, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seem to be a fragmentation in how We behave in our MBeans with
stop/destroy/unload and naming semantics...
MQ seems to do some clean up in destroy and referencing Mbeans that then has
already stopped/destroyed ... and so on
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 04:12:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceController.java
Log:
uncommeted out destroy for now - since that code is in the shutdown class enabeling
filtering out some services - seems cleaner having that logic there for now
Revision
Hi!
I'm using JBoss 2.4.3 and MDB's, which are
connected to MQSeries. I found out thatwhen MQSeries is going down the MDB
is not trying to reconnect. The problem is that in
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jms.JMSContainerInvoker.ExceptionListenerImpl the
notStoped (which should probably be
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 04:40:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Shutdown.java
Log:
added a flag for verbose name messages
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +42 -33jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Shutdown.java
Index: Shutdown.java
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 06:36:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Shutdown.java
Log:
trying to submit a formated file - sorry
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +164 -227 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Shutdown.java
Index: Shutdown.java
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/10/20 09:14:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java
Log:
Fixed bug where self relationships were not initializing correctly.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +7 -1
Do we have a FAQ? If not, I think we should start one.
About every third day I get a message asking me what version of JBoss
supports CMP 2.0, or I get a message asking where 3.0 is.
I know this info is in the message archives, but I think it would be a good
thing to have a central place for a
We have one under the developer links, I think it could go back under the
user links.
One of the problems is that few people maintain it so it tends to get out of
whack.
If you have some time you could prune it and I will gladly reinstate it.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL
on 1-10-20 19.25, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have one under the developer links, I think it could go back under the
user links.
One of the problems is that few people maintain it so it tends to get out of
whack.
If you have some time you could prune it and I will gladly
yes but the posting right now is not really limited to people maintaining
the FAQ,
I will try to modify the forums before leaving for Las Vegas.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:56 PM
|To: marc fleury; Dain
So next week we are going to be in Las Vegas.
It is going to be fun to regroup, meet people and do a kick ass show. I
love the stage.
So we've got an almost sold out class with people from all over the world
and it seems that the US is finally flying again.
It is going to be a great show.
So
Hi,
Andreas Schaefer wrote:
The last few times I tried to run the testsuite I got some many errors
and failures that I was frustrated to go on.
Yes, this used to be really bad - getting better now.
But to make it usefull I would like to have these items:
- documentation how to prepare and
Hi,
marc fleury wrote:
so I not only second that but I think we should introduce speed tests that
make sure that not only the functionality but also the performance is better
or at least not degrading across commits.
Yes, this would be a good idea.
I don't know if there is a way to
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/10/20 13:36:54
Modified:src/stylesheets summary1a.xsl
Log:
added some comments to the testing email
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -0 jbosstest/src/stylesheets/summary1a.xsl
Index: summary1a.xsl
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/10/20 13:50:34
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha/framework/interfaces HARMIClient.java
Log:
turned off System.out.println messages
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +55 -55
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/ha/framework/interfaces/HARMIClient.java
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/10/20 13:51:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha/framework/server HAPartitionImpl.java
Log:
added timeout to rpcs
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2
jbossmx/src/main/org/jboss/ha/framework/server/HAPartitionImpl.java
Index:
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/10/20 13:51:46
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha/framework/server
DistributedReplicantManagerImpl.java
Log:
cleaned up some stuff.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +94 -7
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/10/20 14:00:14
Added: etc slsb.java jnditester.java jboss.xml
cluster-service.xml
Log:
example files
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbossmx/etc/slsb.java
Index: slsb.java
User: starksm
Date: 01/10/20 14:01:43
Modified:varia/src/main/org/jboss/tm/plugins/tyrex
TransactionManagerService.java
TransactionManagerServiceMBean.java
Log:
Clean up the imports and the handling of the domain config file as
User: starksm
Date: 01/10/20 14:02:15
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm/plugins/tyrex Tag: Branch_2_4
TransactionManagerService.java
TransactionManagerServiceMBean.java
Log:
Clean up the imports and the handling of the domain config
User: starksm
Date: 01/10/20 14:04:01
Modified:src/etc/conf/default Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss.jcml
Log:
Update the tyrex configuration to specific the ConfigFile attribute as a
classpath resource rather than a relative file path
Revision ChangesPath
No
A non-stress target already exists and is called tests-unit. It does not
include any of the stress testing and runs in 5.5 minutes on a PIII 850MHz
single processor box:
testsuite 1729./build.sh tests-unit
...
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 5 minutes 23 seconds
testsuite 1731./build.sh
See if this is of any use for performance testing:
JUnitPerf is a collection of JUnit test decorators used to measure the
performance and scalability of functionality contained within existing JUnit
tests.
http://www.clarkware.com/software/JUnitPerf.html
- Original Message -
From: Ole
yes I agree, it is going to be critical for the final push on the Rabbit
(target orbit x-mass)
I think putting the fast tests in a target and making it mandatory for
users to test is a good idea. Then the full 40min test suite should be run
at night only, probably from chris's setup. Then I
We shouldn't be afraid to publicly flog anybody who breaks the mainline.
BTW, Ole, was I the one who broke the mainline?
Bill
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
| I don't think that JUnit can handle speed measurements the
| way we want, as it only does pass/fail.
| But it could be possible to write such a system.
| We should probably have a baseline speed test not depending
| on JBoss that never changes and use that to correct for
| differences in speed
hmmm I wouldn't point any finger, we all broke it at one point or another,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:52 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Please run the
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/10/20 15:09:35
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjboss.xml
Log:
changed default Clustered entity bean commit-option to B from A
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +3 -3 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjboss.xml
Index:
User: starksm
Date: 01/10/20 15:13:22
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins Tag: Branch_2_4
EntityInstanceInterceptor.java
EntityLockInterceptor.java
EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java
User: sparre
Date: 01/10/20 15:25:59
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/mdb/test MDBUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Now catching deployment exceptions in setUp() and throwing it in
testServerFound().
This way, a deployment failure does not result in an empty .xml file,
making the test
User: sparre
Date: 01/10/20 15:25:58
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test JBossTestCase.java
Log:
Now catching deployment exceptions in setUp() and throwing it in
testServerFound().
This way, a deployment failure does not result in an empty .xml file,
making the test case being
Scott M Stark wrote:
A non-stress target already exists and is called tests-unit. It does not
include any of the stress testing and runs in 5.5 minutes on a PIII 850MHz
single processor box:
testsuite 1729./build.sh tests-unit
Ahh, I didn't notice that.
Much faster than the complete
marc fleury wrote:
We have one under the developer links, I think it could go back under the
user links.
One of the problems is that few people maintain it so it tends to get out of
whack.
If you have some time you could prune it and I will gladly reinstate it.
marcf
I'd be
I added a run-basic-testsuite to the main build.xml file that invokes
the tests-unit target in the testsuite module.
- Original Message -
From: Ole Husgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Please run the test
User: starksm
Date: 01/10/20 16:52:52
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
Add a run-basic-testsuite to the main build.xml file that invokes
the tests-unit target in the testsuite module. This test should be run
prior to any commits to ensure a minimum compatibility level with the
How about a wiki? It seems to me that this might be a better solution for
such continually changing info as jboss FAQ/howto.
One possibility is very quick wiki, that I just found (haven't tried it
yet)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/veryquickwiki/
It claims to be a drop- in war in any j2ee web
Patches item #473280, was opened at 2001-10-20 15:44
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=473280group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerolf Scherr (gscherr)
Assigned to:
on 1-10-21 02.34, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a wiki?
Yes or get these linguistic kids to play ... becouse here is content ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting.
I just played with the phpWiki stuff and I guess it is worth a try.
Can you try running it on Jetty and then ask andreas to put it somewhere in
the website
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent:
|Yes or get these linguistic kids to play ... becouse here is content ...
Look who is talking ;-)
There used to be this Holger Baxman character who would just babelfish
his german posts about 2 years ago, and then he would talk about impossible
stuff like abstract metadata repositories in
on 1-10-21 03.57, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
abstract metadata repositories in broken machine translation.
http://193.14.119.195/ljud\sexydollar.mp3
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 129
Errors:5
Failures: 6
[time of test: 21 October 2001 3:16 GMT]
[java.version:
Maybe I am a complete idiot, but what should I see if the test is
successful?
As a policy, should some one only check-in if the change does not increase
the number of failures / errors?
Dain
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October
Hi guys..
FarmAutoDeployer.java and FarmAutoDeployerMBean.java is in the
org/jboss/system path but it's packages are org.jboss.deployment.
Is it ok if I move them to the org/jboss/deployment dir???
Is there a plan for the tests in test/jboss?? Should they be getting moved
into the test
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 October 2001 4:8 GMT]
[java.version:
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/10/20 20:12:59
Added: src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
NewQueuedPessimisticEJBLock.java
NonentrantMessage.java
Log:
These classes demonstrate a strategy for marking some method invocations
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 20:17:01
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/xml XMLTestService.java
Log:
Removed one of the deprecation warnings
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +4 -4 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/xml/XMLTestService.java
Index:
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/10/20 20:17:10
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
CMRMessage.java
Log:
Messages are now marked as non-entrant.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/10/20 20:21:03
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjboss.xml
Log:
Changed cmp 2.0 beans to use the modified queued pessimistic lock, which
handles non-entrant method invocations.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +3 -2
On 2001.10.20 22:54:19 -0400 Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi guys..
FarmAutoDeployer.java and FarmAutoDeployerMBean.java is in the
org/jboss/system path but it's packages are org.jboss.deployment.
Is it ok if I move them to the org/jboss/deployment dir???
Sounds good to me, but I guess Andy
This is amazing, you guys have been rockin
the house, I can't wait to try this out.
I was wondering what the easiest way to
define custom load balancing polices would be. We have an application
which hosts multiple clients and we would like to develop a policy that ensures
all requests for
How about a nice little quote/reference
Rick?
marcf
BTW: We have been running jboss for 5
months now and host roughly 200 clients and the numbers are growing
weekly!! Again, you guys rock!!
Thanks
Rick
___
Rick Gibbs
Dealer.com (formerly
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 130
Successful tests: 121
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 October 2001 5:29 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 October 2001 6:29 GMT]
[java.version:
In the jboss-all/testsuite/output/report directory will be an html
directory and a
text directory that contain the unit test summaries. The
text/TESTS-TestSuites.txt
file is what is mailed to the list and contains the number of tests run,
successful
tests, errors and failures. The
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq GenericConnectionFactory.java
SpyConnectionFactory.java
SpyXAConnectionFactory.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:12
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your interested on how it
is done.
Revision ChangesPath
1.43 +4 -3
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:12
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jbossmq-service.xml
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your interested on how it
is done.
Revision Changes
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:13
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/uil UILServerILService.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/uil UILServerILFactory.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:14
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test ConnectionTestCase.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your interested on how it
is done.
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:13
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/jvm JVMServerILService.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your interested on how it
is done.
Revision
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:13
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/rmi RMIServerILService.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your interested on how it
is done.
Revision
User: chirino
Date: 01/10/20 22:38:13
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il ServerILFactory.java
ServerILJMXService.java
Log:
Feature add:
You can now setup a JBossMQ connection with out using JNDI.
The ConnectionTestCase has a test case in case your
Hi
all,
Sacha Labourey and I
would like to announce the availability of new JBoss clustering features in
RabbitHole-3.0 (the mainline). There is still a lot of testing to be done
so this is really BETA code. If you have any questions, pop either one of
us an email on the jboss-dev list.
Oh
fuck this is sooo pretty...
I
can't wait to see you guys in Vegas.
I'll
say, we rule!
marcf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
BurkeSent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:20 PMTo:
Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
65 matches
Mail list logo
