JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1157
Successful tests: 1152
Errors:5
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-30.07-27 GMT]
[java.version:
Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring. I like it.
--jason
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56 PM, julien viet wrote:
sorry I gave a wrong link :
http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro
jv have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net
jv they added : exceptions,
not sure they will keep php community whith them. for me
php success is settled on the fact php scripters don't have to worry
about theses kinds of things.
JD Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring. I like it.
JD --jason
JD On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56 PM, julien viet
It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features
will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now. It just looks
like it will allow them to write better software. I spent the past 2
weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for features
like
JD It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features
JD will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now. It just looks
JD like it will allow them to write better software. I spent the past 2
JD weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for
BTW, who is currently working on ECPerf? What is the status? I am interested
in some feedback about the current status.F
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: samedi, 29. mars 2003 21:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
[]
[] [] [] [] [] [] []
*
*
*
95206
(0571) 86465080 86467128 86455732
(0571)86469732
13958106746 E_mail[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hzefu.com www.hzefu.net www.hzefu.cn
QQ965301
---
This SF.net email is
Hi,
I've noticed that UserTransaction does not seem to work without JVM-wide jndi
configuration. For example, the following code
code
Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
env.put(java.naming.factory.initial,
org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory);
env.put(java.naming.provider.url,
Its just a limitiation of how the ClientUserTransaction will look to JNDI to
obtain the UserTransactionSessionFactory. This class should allow this info
to be assigned as a static property of the class so that ths
UserTransactionSessionFactory
can be looked up once from the JBoss JNDI namespace
Stefan Reich [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been doing most of the work.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:24 AM
julien viet wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
JD Though now that I think about it I would prefer that Java was more like
JD PHP in the sense of a light weight web application development language
JD with its rich extensions and apis.
we discussed with Dain at boot camp and we wished
having a way
Hello Marcel,
Sunday, March 30, 2003, 6:23:38 PM, you wrote:
MA julien viet wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
JD Though now that I think about it I would prefer that Java was more like
JD PHP in the sense of a light weight web application development language
JD with its rich extensions and apis.
why don't we bring them on then?
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options
-Original Message-
From:
cool, it could help for module or block scripting in Nukes,
i.e get code class - fully generate class - compile it -
generate xmbeam - deploy it
pluggable resource loader is very helpfull, I don't know if
we can have bytes of class through unified classloaders but
that would help.
We
I talked with 2 compiler projects after JBoss boot camp and both were
interested in being integrated, but I dropped the ball and got busy on
some other stuff. If anyone is interested in this I can send you the
contact info.
-dain
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 10:37 AM, julien viet wrote:
The 3.2 branch (fresh check out just taken from CVS) is giving me
the exception below with IBM's VM on Linux.
Shouldn't we fix this before 3.2 goes final?
Cheers,
Francisco
-
$ uname -a
Linux pong 2.2.19 #1 SMP Wed Oct 17 08:56:33
[]
[] [] [] [] [] [] []
*
*
*
95206
(0571) 86465080 86467128 86455732
(0571)86469732
13958106746 E_mail[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hzefu.com www.hzefu.net www.hzefu.cn
QQ965301
---
This SF.net email is
julien,
why don't you try to bring some of these guys in to do the compiler for
NUKES? JSP like writing for advanced programmatic modules?
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:06 PM
yes that's a good idea and I was thinking about it. Dain could
you send me details and contact infos ?
A generic compiling service in jboss could be very usefull.
That + AOP could make wonders.
julien
mf julien,
mf why don't you try to bring some of these guys in to do the compiler for
mf
Hi Sacha,
thank you very much for your comments. Now I believe I have quite clean
picture of partition merge issues.
Maybe the conditions and limitations you mentioned should be added to
documentation as they are not obvious and there can be a lot of people
living, as I did before, in
söndagen den 30 mars 2003 kl 20.33 skrev marc fleury:
why don't we bring them on then?
Send in another X number troops to fix the non result ..
Pulezzze what is the non result U are experiencing ... the real or the
non-real ... and You say solve it with numbers -hehe ...
You are such a
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1163
Successful tests: 1159
Errors:4
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-31.01-42 GMT]
[java.version:
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #708853, was opened at 2003-03-24 07:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708853group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frédéric Donckels (lubdub)
Assigned to:
Change Notes item #712495, was opened at 2003-03-31 06:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=712495group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Yes, sure. In the meantime, I've added my SFSB proposal to the clustering
todo list.
Thank you for this discussion,
sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Klimek
Sent: lundi, 31. mars 2003 00:07
To:
Bugs item #708853, was opened at 2003-03-24 16:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708853group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frédéric Donckels (lubdub)
Assigned to:
27 matches
Mail list logo
